Wisconsin’s choice not to release a Week 1 depth chart against Notre Dame says plenty about where things stand inside the program, even if the Badgers aren’t spelling it out on paper.
For years, that document has been a routine part of Wisconsin’s opening-week game notes. Even when the Badgers included a depth chart, they were careful to note it was only a reflection of the previous game’s usage and not some official declaration.
Still, it was there. This time, it wasn’t.
UW Brand Communications said the call was made because, “The in-season depth charts are based off the previous game’s usage ... made the decision not to speculate on this prior to the season.” According to Colten Bartholomew of Badger Extra, that decision came from the sports information directors, not the coaches.
That’s the official line. But it’s tough to look at a move like this and think Luke Fickell and his staff aren’t heavily involved in what gets out to the public.
Wisconsin’s roster has more than 50 new players this year, but that alone doesn’t fully explain the change. The Badgers had plenty of turnover before last season, too, and still released a Week 1 depth chart then.
So what’s really going on? The simplest read is that Wisconsin is trying to keep things fluid in spots that are still unsettled.
Field cornerback and backup quarterback are two obvious examples. Fickell has already made clear that he may never formally label a QB2.
“Today, we continued to have both of those guys rep with the twos. I don’t know that we’ll ever designate a whole lot of who’s the No. 2,” he said at his Week 1 presser.
In a lot of cases, coaches sidestep that problem by putting “OR” next to a position on the depth chart. Wisconsin could have taken that route. Instead, the decision to leave the chart out altogether suggests there are multiple roles and rotations that still aren’t settled enough for public consumption.
The injury situation on the offensive line only adds to the uncertainty. Starting right guard Emerson Mandell and starting right tackle Kevin Heywood drew attention throughout fall camp, and Fickell said Monday he still doesn’t have a firm answer on either player.
“Those guys have been back in some capacity, but I couldn’t tell you where we are today, right now. It’ll probably be closer to a game-time decision. Both of them took reps today,” he said.
If Wisconsin listed both linemen as starters and then they weren’t ready for Sunday, that would be misleading. But if they were left off and could actually play, that would send Badgers fans into a spin. Either way, the public version of the depth chart would create noise.
There’s also another possibility: Wisconsin may be dealing with injuries it hasn’t made public yet, and a depth chart would force more honesty than the program wants to provide. That kind of disclosure isn’t required for a non-conference game like Notre Dame. In conference play, the Badgers now have to release four injury reports each week, but this one doesn’t come with that obligation.
In Other News...
Wisconsins Notre Dame Opener Just Got More Interesting For One Reason
The lead-up to Wisconsins opener against No. 4 Notre Dame has taken on a different look on both sides of the ball, with the Badgers dealing with questions up front and the Irish sorting through a couple of notable injury issues of their own. For Wisconsin, the focus has been on the availability of starting offensive linemen Emerson Mandell and Kevin Heywood, a concern that only adds to the challenge of protecting the quarterback in a matchup that already looked steep on paper.
Notre Dames latest injury report makes the matchup even more worth watching, especially with linebacker Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asa listed as questionable and wide receiver Quincy Porter ruled out for Week 1. Porters absence matters because he was expected to be part of the starting receiving group, while Viliamu-Asas status could affect the Irish defenses depth as the game approaches. For the Badgers, any edge in a season opener like this can matter, and the health updates on both sidelines could shape how the first major test of the year unfolds. [Read more 🡒]
Wisconsins 2027 Class Is Sparking A Debate Badgers Fans Wont Ignore
Wisconsins 2027 basketball recruiting class has already stirred up a familiar kind of debate among Badgers fans, and it starts with how the national services are valuing the group. Guard Jalen Brown, forward Baboucarr Ann and center Jack Thelen are all viewed by most outlets as top-100 level prospects, which is enough to make this class stand out before any of them have even arrived in Madison.
ESPNs latest update, though, only included Brown at No. 96 and left Ann and Thelen unranked, a discrepancy that has only added fuel to the discussion. Rankings always come with some built-in subjectivity, and the real test for Wisconsins staff will come later, when the trio is actually on campus and the comparisons shift from internet lists to what they look like once practice starts. [Read more 🡒]
Eight Former Badgers Just Earned A New Reason For Fans To Watch
The 2026 NFL Draft came and went without a Wisconsin selection, but the Badgers still found a way into the league conversation. Several undrafted former Wisconsin players signed free agent deals, got into preseason action and kept themselves in the mix long enough to survive the first wave of roster cuts, which is no small accomplishment in a league where the margins are razor thin.
Now eight former Badgers have a new home on practice squads around the NFL, with landing spots spread across teams like the Rams, Dolphins, Eagles, Falcons, Saints, Giants, Panthers and 49ers. For Wisconsin fans, it is a familiar kind of late-summer scoreboard to follow: not draft night headlines, but the slower, quieter progress of players hanging on, earning another chance and giving the Badgers a reason to keep an eye on Sundays a little differently. [Read more 🡒]