A federal judge’s ruling Friday night sent a jolt through college sports, and West Virginia is right in the middle of sorting out what it could mean.
A U.S. District Court judge in Colorado granted an injunction that would require the NCAA to give an extra year of eligibility to every player from the high school class of 2022 who finished their eligibility in the 2025-26 athletic year.
The NCAA is expected to challenge the decision, so the full impact is still very much up in the air. But if it holds, the ripple effect could be enormous.
For WVU, the first question is simple: who does this touch? In football, the list includes punter Oliver Straw, defensive back Fred Perry, tight end Jacob Barrick, cornerback Jason Chambers and defensive lineman Eddie Kelly.
On the men’s basketball side, it includes Boise State transfer Javan Buchanan, forward Brenen Lorent and guard Treysen Eaglestaff. In baseball, the names are outfielders Ben Lumsden and Brock Wills, pitchers Ben McDougal and Carson Estrisdge and catcher Matthew Graveline.
There are more across the department if you start digging through rosters at WVUSports.com. The basic test is straightforward: if a player was a freshman in 2022 and a senior in the most recent season, this ruling applies.
A few of the names on that WVU list are already in other places. Barrick, Lumsden and McDougal are currently coaching with WVU.
Eaglestaff played for the New York Knicks in the Summer League. Estridge signed with the Houston Astros.
Buchanan is the one who really stands out here, because he had already been denied a waiver for an extra year and was weighing legal options.
The bigger issue, though, is what this does to roster management. That’s where the uncertainty gets messy fast. If this ruling survives, schools may have to revisit roster limits and revenue-sharing limits, because nobody planned for a sudden wave of additional eligible players.
One administrator put it bluntly: "They might adjust roster size, but they won't adjust cap IMO."
That’s the tension hanging over everything. If roster and spending limits stay where they are, or even if they are tweaked but still tight, schools may need more flexibility through the transfer portal. The plaintiffs in this case asked for an injunction over the transfer rules as well, and the assumption is that request was granted, meaning those players are not tied to the portal’s schedule.
Still, nobody is pretending the logistics are clean. A football front office staffer said, "Honestly," a football front office staffer told me, "I have no clue how this plays.
Also, how many of those guys who haven't been around for 8 months could make an impact? If they aren't in the NFL, are they really good enough?
The answer is probably no.
"Plus, there is a 105 (player) roster limit that everyone has worked toward. Also, how would your current team feel if they add a guy who hasn't been with them for 8 months?
But it also really only applies to guys who played 4 years but didn't go to the NFL. I don't think there will be a ton of people who qualify, but there will be some."
There’s also the matter of whether schools even want the roster and spending rules to change. Multiple people said they and/or their school would prefer to keep those rules in place. The NCAA’s Division I cabinet, made up of conference commissioners and administrators from across Division I, supported the 5-for-5 rule and opposed grandfathering in players.
At WVU, Lorient appears to be a name they will at least try to keep in the mix, though there’s clearly awareness that other programs will come calling. Head coach Ross Hodge seemed to hint just yesterday at bringing in someone like Lorient, and probably no one else. This ruling could also push WVU to think bigger, with Buchanan now in the picture if the fit makes sense.
And this is nowhere near finished. More lawsuits are coming, and pending plaintiffs are expected to keep pressing for similar rulings. The Colorado judge’s language gives them plenty to work with, saying the plaintiffs in that case "are likely to succeed" with their claims and that they'd "suffer irreparable harm without issuance of an injunction."
For now, the cleanest conclusion is that nothing is settled. Everyone around the situation expects the NCAA to appeal, and the expectation is that the fight goes to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Colorado.
In Other News...
WVU Could Suddenly Have Some Unexpected Roster Decisions To Make
A federal ruling out of Colorado has put another roster wrinkle in front of college football programs, including West Virginia, by opening the door for some former players from the 2022 student-athlete class to chase an additional year of eligibility. Judge Charlotte Sweeney of the U.S. District Court of Colorado granted a class-wide preliminary injunction that pauses the old NCAA framework for those athletes, creating a possible avenue for ex-Mountaineers to return to school if the decision holds.
For WVU, the timing matters because the NCAA is expected to appeal to the Tenth Circuit, and that process could stretch on for months before the picture clears. In the meantime, the Mountaineers may have to sort through an unexpected list of players who could become eligible again, a situation that can affect scholarship planning, depth charts and the broader shape of the roster well before fall camp gets here. [Read more 🡒]
WVU Secondary Suddenly Has A Bigger Question Than Fans Expected
West Virginias secondary was already shaping up as a key summer storyline, and Jason Chambers decision adds another layer to it. The starting cornerback spent last season as part of the Mountaineers rotation and gave the staff a veteran presence on the outside, which is why his place on the roster had figured into the conversation about how much experience would be back in the defensive backfield.
Now the focus shifts to who steps in around him, with the cornerback room suddenly looking thinner than expected. West Virginia still has options to sort through as it builds toward the upcoming season, but the departure changes the picture enough that the staff has to rework its plans and lean on a new lead option in a spot that was supposed to be more settled. [Read more 🡒]