Nationals Suddenly Have A Zack Littell Problem Before The Deadline

As the trade deadline looms, the Nationals face a dilemma with pitcher Zack Littell after his performance nosedives at a critical juncture in the season.

The Nationals’ weekend swung from one extreme to the other, and Zack Littell sat right at the center of the mess.

One day after Washington blasted the Athletics 23-4 on Friday, the club was flattened 15-1 on Saturday. Littell started that game and got hit hard immediately, giving up five earned runs in the first inning before finishing with eight earned runs allowed over six innings. His season line now sits at a 5.43 ERA in 20 appearances, 13 of them starts, a number that falls well short of what Washington expected when it brought him in.

That disappointment matters now because Littell was never just supposed to be rotation depth. When the Nationals signed him to a one-year, $7 million deal in March of 2026, he was viewed as a possible upgrade and, if things went right, a trade chip before the deadline.

That idea made sense at the time. The Cincinnati Reds had paid a real price to get him from the Tampa Bay Rays last season, and he had posted back-to-back seasons with an ERA under 4.00.

But with the trade deadline set for Aug. 3 and only a couple of weeks left, the market picture looks very different. Teams are not likely to be lining up for a starter whose numbers have trended this far in the wrong direction.

The underlying metrics only make the case worse. Littell’s expected ERA is 6.43, higher than the 5.43 he has actually posted.

He has surrendered 25 home runs, the second most in the majors, while his 14.7% strikeout rate sits well below league average. His 7.2% walk rate is the highest since he became a starting pitcher, and his Stuff+ mark of 83 is the lowest of his career.

That combination leaves Washington in a bind. If the Nationals try to move him, the return would likely be minimal. If they keep him, they’re banking on a veteran starter who has not delivered the impact they were hoping for when they signed him.

There is still a path where Washington simply rides out the season with Littell. He has a mutual option for 2027, and based on how this year has gone, he would probably be inclined to pick it up. That would give the Nationals a full offseason to work with him and, in theory, try to rebuild his value for a future trade.

The problem is the price tag. That mutual option is for $12 million, and with Littell’s season going the way it has, it’s hard to imagine Washington wanting to commit to another year at that number.

For now, the Nationals are stuck between an unappealing trade market and a starter who hasn’t lived up to the deal. What happens next will play out over the coming weeks, but the signing has clearly not gone the way either side expected.

In Other News...

Nationals Draft Signings Just Revealed Something About Toboni's First Class

The Nationals have now locked in three more members of their draft class, getting second-rounder Chase Brunson, third-rounder Luke Williams and fourth-rounder Cooper Harris under contract as the organization continues to shape the first group selected under the new regime. For a club trying to build a deeper talent base, the signings offer an early look at how Washington is balancing upside, bonus structure and projected fit as it brings this class into the system.

What stands out is how the money was spread across the group, with each player landing at a different point on the bonus spectrum. That kind of distribution can say plenty about how the Nationals viewed the board and where they were willing to be flexible, and it also hints at the roles they may envision for each arm and bat as they begin their pro careers. [Read more 🡒]

Foster Griffin Is Giving The Nationals Something They Desperately Needed

Foster Griffin has spent the past week giving Washington exactly the kind of stability it has been chasing, and his latest outing against the Athletics only strengthened that case. The left-hander went seven innings and allowed one run, continuing a stretch that has quietly turned him into one of the more dependable arms on the roster while the Nationals were busy taking two of three in Sacramento.

The offense did its part behind him, too, with Harry Ford, CJ Abrams and Dylan Crews all delivering timely damage to back up the pitching. Abrams and Crews each added a homer in the win, a timely burst for a club that has been trying to stack together cleaner, more complete nights, and Griffins run of consistency now leaves Washington with a decision to make about just how far this version of him can carry. [Read more 🡒]

Nationals May Soon Face Their Toughest CJ Abrams Decision Yet

CJ Abrams has become one of the most important long-term questions on the Nationals roster, and the organization may not be able to wait forever to answer it. The shortstop is in the middle of a strong season and remains under club control through 2028, which gives Washington some breathing room, but it also puts a clock on how the front office thinks about his future value.

If the Nationals cannot line up a long-term extension, the 2026 trade deadline is shaping up as a possible inflection point. Waiting longer could make Abrams harder to maximize in a deal, while letting him walk in free agency would leave Washington with only a compensatory draft pick, a far smaller return than a trade could bring if the timing is right. [Read more 🡒]