Nationals Rebuild Has Turned Ruthless And The Hard Part Is Next

The Washington Nationals are adopting a bold strategy of removing underperformers to build a winning team, marking a dramatic shift in their quest for postseason success.

The Washington Nationals’ quickest path forward may not come from a blockbuster haul. It may come from clearing out the dead weight.

That’s the basic idea behind president of baseball operations Paul Toboni’s early work: build a sturdier foundation, improve the players already in the organization, and move on from the ones who aren’t helping. He didn’t attach a timeline to that mission, but the turnaround has moved faster than expected. What many figured would take two or three years has already started to take shape.

The message has been clear inside the organization. If a player didn’t show real improvement or at least enough promise to justify patience, his draft pedigree or signing bonus wasn’t going to save him.

First-rounder Dylan Crews was sent to Triple-A in Spring Training before eventually returning. Brady House, another first-round pick, was also demoted and later brought back.

Others weren’t as fortunate. Jackson Rutledge, Robert Hassell, and top international free agent Armando Cruz were all removed from the system.

There were more, too.

Toboni has not treated every player the same way, but his leash has been short for most. Players he acquired have had a better shot at sticking around, though even that wasn’t universal.

Cionel Perez was gone quickly, with his run ending on May 4. Zack Littell and Miles Mikolas lasted longer, but between the three of them, Toboni committed more than $10 million.

That’s baseball.

The bigger point is that subtraction itself can be a weapon.

If you use negative WAR as the cutoff, the Nationals had a combined -8.1 in 2026 from that group of players. A chunk of those names are already gone.

Others are tougher calls, because nobody is rushing to release Luis Perales (-0.5 WAR), Yovanny Cruz (-0.3), DJ Herz (-0.2), or Nasim Nunez (-0.2). Drew Millas (-0.2) could also remain in the picture.

Still, that pool is where roster spots can be created, especially if those players are occupying 40-man spots. Replacing that production with league-average players could be worth about +6.9 WAR, which is essentially seven wins added without making a splashy external move.

That matters because the gap between where the Nationals were and where they need to go isn’t small. Pythagorean expectations would have had them at 82-80 instead of 77-85.

Using Toboni’s “visible scoreboard” lens, you could start with the actual 77 wins, add back the +6.9 WAR from subtraction, and land at 83.9 wins. From there, another +5.1 WAR would put them at 89 wins and in postseason territory.

The catch is that the numbers also have to account for players who are already gone, such as Luis Garcia Jr., Foster Griffin, and Curtis Mead. That’s +5.5 WAR out the door.

If you assume a full season from Andrew Alvarez, Dylan Crews, Brady House, and Connelly Early gives you at least 3.0 WAR back, then the target grows again. Under that math, the Nationals would really need closer to +7.6 WAR in new value.

Add in a conservative +1.6 WAR from internal improvement, and the club would still need about 6.0 WAR from outside additions.

And that kind of production isn’t cheap.

On the free-agent market, a 1.0 WAR player generally runs about $7.4 million to $8.6 million, according to FanGraphs. Push that out to bigger names and the price climbs fast.

Michael King, for instance, can be framed as a +2.7 WAR starter at roughly $10 million per WAR, which would make him a $27 million-a-year player, likely on a five-year deal. Foster Griffin, meanwhile, posted +2.6 WAR, which would value out around $19.2 million using the $7.4 million figure.

So what does Washington still need? The list is pretty clean: a left-handed hitting first baseman, a top-of-the-rotation starter, and a proven closer.

Jake Bauers of Milwaukee is the lefty first baseman that fits the profile here. For the rotation, King or Griffin are the names floated.

For the ninth inning, Adrian Morejon of the Padres is the suggestion. Morejon posted +2.8 WAR, and Bauers finished at +3.7 WAR.

Put Bauers, King, and Morejon together, and the Nationals would be looking at +9.2 WAR.

If they somehow landed that trio, the math starts getting loud. That kind of boost could push Washington to 92 wins and into the mix for a division title.

It’s not a fantasy the franchise has never lived through, either. The 2012 Nationals added Gio Gonzalez, Edwin Jackson, and Bryce Harper, and the result was a 20-win leap, from 80 wins to a franchise-record 98.

Gonzalez contributed +4.8 WAR, Jackson +2.5, and Harper +4.4 for a combined +11.7 WAR.

That 2012 club did have some addition by subtraction, but more than anything it found another gear. The core improved, and the new pieces mattered.

That’s the model here, too. There is work to do, and Toboni is on the clock.

In Other News...

Seaver King Is Giving Nationals Fans Real Hope For One Big Reason

Seaver Kings rise has become one of the more encouraging developments in the Nationals player pipeline, especially after the uneven 2025 season left plenty of questions about how quickly he might settle in. Instead of letting that setback define him, King showed a much better feel for the strike zone and a real step forward in impact at the plate while moving between Double-A and Triple-A, enough to put him squarely among the sports most closely watched prospects and put him in the conversation for a major league look next season.

The bat is what has changed the conversation around him, and it is easy to see why Nationals fans have latched onto it. King has spent most of his time at shortstop while also bouncing to second and third base, which gives Washington some needed flexibility, but his glove still needs to clean up before anyone can feel fully settled about his long-term fit. For now, though, the promise is obvious, and the organization suddenly has a young infielder whose upside feels much closer to the majors than it did a year ago. [Read more 🡒]

Jack Sinclair May Be Exactly What The Nationals Bullpen Needed

Jack Sinclairs late-season arrival gave the Nationals something they had been searching for in the bullpen, even if the sample was small. After spending most of the year at Triple-A Rochester, the right-hander reached Washington in September 2025 and handled himself well in his first taste of the majors, settling into relief work and giving the club a look at a pitcher who could miss bats and limit damage.

The early returns were encouraging enough to make Sinclair a name worth tracking as the Nationals sort through their pitching depth. He drew positive remarks from manager Blake Butera and got into leverage spots during his first stint, the kind of usage that can tell a team a lot about whether a young arm is ready for a bigger role down the line. The question now is whether Washington can turn that brief debut into something more meaningful moving forward. [Read more 🡒]

Nationals Draft Class Faces One Big Question After Early Reviews

Baseball Americas 2026 draft report card offered an early snapshot of how the Nationals class stacks up, and it already points to a group with real variety. The evaluators singled out different strengths across the class, from Chris Hacopians bat to Luke Williams defensive profile and Chase Brunsons arm, with the overall review built around how each players college or high school rsum could translate once the organization gets them into its system.

Even with that spread of talent, the class comes with one notable wrinkle before the first full pro chapter even begins. Francisco Riveros background is part of the conversation, and the delayed start to his career adds another layer to a group that otherwise looks like it could move in several directions at once, depending on which of these young players takes to pro ball fastest. [Read more 🡒]