When Ethan Grunkemeyer committed to Virginia Tech in January, the buzz in Blacksburg jumped fast. The former Penn State quarterback was back with James Franklin, offensive coordinator Ty Howle and quarterbacks coach Danny O'Brien, which gave the Hokies a passer who already knew the system Franklin brought with him. Pair that with a strong transfer portal haul, and it’s easy to see why the optimism around Virginia Tech has kept building.
But the hype may be running a little ahead of the evidence.
Grunkemeyer’s 2025 season was solid, even encouraging in spots. He completed 123 of 178 passes for 1,339 yards, eight touchdowns and four interceptions, good for a 69.1 percent completion rate and a 142.6 passer rating.
For a first-year starter who was thrown into the job after Drew Allar suffered a season-ending injury midway through the year, that’s a respectable line. Penn State went 4-3 with Grunkemeyer as the starter and finished the season by beating Clemson in the Pinstripe Bowl, where he threw for 262 yards and two touchdowns.
Still, the raw numbers don’t tell the whole story. Penn State never asked him to shoulder the offense.
He averaged just over 16 pass attempts and about 122 passing yards per game, a far cry from what many ACC starters are asked to handle each week. The Nittany Lions built around one of the country’s best rushing attacks, with Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen doing the heavy lifting and letting Grunkemeyer work in a controlled passing game.
That context matters when people start talking about him as if he’s ready to jump straight into the ACC’s top tier.
The touchdown total says the same thing. Eight passing scores in 11 appearances, with seven starts, is fine.
It’s not the kind of production that screams instant star. And nearly two-thirds of those touchdowns came in the fourth quarter, which hints at some late-game poise but also shows how limited the explosive passing output was for long stretches.
The toughest tests also exposed where the work still is. In his first career start against Iowa, Grunkemeyer managed only 93 passing yards and threw two interceptions.
Against Ohio State, he completed nearly 68 percent of his passes but finished with just 145 yards and no touchdown as Penn State struggled to create big plays through the air. Those games were a reminder that accuracy by itself doesn’t automatically turn into offense against elite defenses.
He did, however, show real growth as the season went on. His final four starts came without an interception, and his confidence seemed to rise with each week. He went 17 of 21 against Rutgers, was nearly flawless against Nebraska, and finished with his best all-around outing in the Pinstripe Bowl against Clemson.
That progression is why he was such a highly rated portal addition in the first place. The ceiling is obvious. The problem is the leap some people are already making from “promising” to “one of the ACC’s best.”
Virginia Tech should help him. The Hokies bring back more experienced receivers, and Franklin’s familiarity with Grunkemeyer should smooth the transition. But the job still comes with a clear ask: prove he can create explosive plays consistently through the air.
At Penn State, he was at his best when he protected the ball and took what was there. The next step is showing he can lift an offense when the run game isn’t doing the heavy lifting.
That’s the key point as expectations in Blacksburg keep climbing. Some preseason projections have Virginia Tech pushing for eight or more wins, and a lot of that excitement is tied to Grunkemeyer becoming an immediate difference-maker.
He may get there. Franklin recruited him as a consensus blue-chip prospect, trusted him in meaningful Big Ten games and brought him to Virginia Tech to run the offense. Those are real endorsements.
But his 2025 season was about efficiency, ball security and steady progress, not dominant production. If he makes another jump in 2026, Virginia Tech could end up with one of the better quarterbacks in the conference by season’s end.
For now, the smarter bet is growth, not instant stardom.
In Other News...
ACC Preseason Voting Sent A Familiar Message To Virginia Tech
Virginia Techs preseason ACC recognition came with a familiar kind of restraint, as defensive lineman Kemari Copeland was the lone Hokie named to the leagues preseason all-conference team. For a program trying to climb back into the upper half of the ACC, it was a reminder that the conference still sees more proven star power elsewhere, even as Copeland gives the Hokies at least one established presence to point to heading into camp.
Copeland also came away without any votes for ACC Preseason Player of the Year, an award that went to Miami quarterback Darian Mensah. The broader trend has not been much kinder to Virginia Tech, which has had only a handful of preseason All-ACC nods in recent years and little traction in the leagues top individual voting, leaving the Hokies with plenty to prove before their 2026 opener against VMI. [Read more 🡒]
ACC Media Just Sent Virginia Tech Fans A Clear Message
The ACCs 2026 preseason poll offered a pretty clear snapshot of where Virginia Tech sits heading into the new year, and it is not exactly in the leagues upper tier. The Hokies were slotted eighth in the 17-team field, a middle-of-the-pack placement that reflects both the uncertainty around the program and the expectations that come with a fresh start under new head coach James Franklin.
For Virginia Tech, the ranking is a reminder of how much ground still needs to be made up after a three-win 2025 season. Miami drew most of the first-place votes, with Florida State and Stanford also getting some support, while the Hokies now have to turn outside perception into something sturdier once the 2026 season gets going. [Read more 🡒]