Max Sasson has already gone from college free agent to one of the Vancouver Canucks’ clearest development wins, and now the next phase of his game comes with Manny Malhotra back in the picture.
Sasson spent most of his first two pro seasons in Abbotsford after signing with Vancouver in 2023, then became a full-time NHL player last season with 66 games for the Canucks. His speed gave the lineup a jolt in a season that often needed one, and it’s easy to see why fans latched onto him. But the bigger question now is what comes next for a 25-year-old who is no longer a prospect, but still very much a player with room to grow.
The most realistic jump for Sasson next season sits in the 25-35 point range, along with progress in faceoffs and penalty killing. His point total last season didn’t leap off the page, but he showed enough to suggest he can provide steady depth offense.
The skating is already a weapon. So are his shot accuracy and his ability to turn controlled rushes into zone entries.
What he still needs is a more defined identity. Sasson is listed as a centre and played most of his minutes there for Vancouver, and his motor plus range give him the look of a full-time middle-six option.
The problem is the details. Among players who took at least 200 faceoffs last season, he finished 15th worst at 42.1%.
That makes it harder for coaches to trust him in key spots, especially in the defensive zone.
That same issue affects his penalty-kill case, and Sasson knows it. “I really want to come into training camp and show that I can be a reliable PK guy,” Sasson said. “I can play up and down the lineup.”
Even with his speed, he ranked outside Vancouver’s top 10 forwards in shorthanded ice time last season. A shift to wing is also on the table, with Braeden Cootes pushing for minutes, Aatu Räty filling a similar depth role, and Caleb Malhotra on the way.
Wherever he lines up, Sasson has to prove he’s more than a burst of energy. The Canucks need to see a player who can handle matchups and hold his own at both ends.
There’s also a real ceiling case here. If everything clicks, Sasson could push toward half-point-per-game production and become a much more dangerous playmaker.
The raw speed is already elite. NHL Edge had him in the 97th percentile in maximum skating speed and the 95th percentile in bursts of 35 km/h or faster, even with limited ice time.
The next step is making that speed count more often once he gets into the offensive zone. Sasson can carry pucks in, but he doesn’t always know what comes next. Corey Sznajder’s tracking project showed him above the NHL average in controlled zone entries, but well below average in how often those entries turn into scoring chances.
Malhotra could help there. Sasson posted a 58-point pace across a 72-game AHL season while playing under him, then kept that momentum rolling during a Calder Cup championship run in which he averaged more than half a point per game. That familiarity matters, and so does the confidence that comes from working in the same system again.
Linus Karlsson was a big part of that AHL production, and the connection carried over last season in Vancouver. Sasson logged more than 200 additional five-on-five minutes with Karlsson than with any other forward, and the pair posted a 55% Corsi For %.
That’s a strong number on any team, and it stands out even more on the NHL’s last-place club. With both players having done some of their best work under Malhotra before, the possibility is there for another step forward.
Of course, there’s a downside too. Sasson’s speed and personality have made him a fan favorite, but the flaws in his game can become more obvious if his responsibilities grow.
Faceoffs are one thing. Defensive-zone support is another.
Fast centres can get too eager and drift toward the breakout before possession is truly secured, and that can open up dangerous space. Malhotra’s system asks the centre to stay engaged through the middle, and Sasson has some experience there, but it remains a work in progress.
That’s the crux of his season. Depth players are judged first on whether they can keep the puck out of their own net, and Sasson still doesn’t have enough offensive punch to mask inconsistent defending. His ability to improve his defensive-zone positioning, puck retrievals, stick battles and faceoff technique will shape how often he plays and what kind of role he earns.
If he doesn’t build on last season’s momentum, a healthy scratch role is on the table as Vancouver creates openings for younger players. If he does, the Canucks may finally have something more than a speed merchant. They may have a dependable two-way centreman with a real NHL future.
In Other News...
Canucks Face A Real Braeden Cootes Development Dilemma
Braeden Cootes is already at the heart of one of the Canucks more interesting development questions heading into next season. The 2025 first-rounder signed his entry-level deal in July and has only a brief NHL sample to his name, but his work in junior has kept the conversation moving fast. For Vancouver, the issue is less about whether Cootes has long-term upside and more about how quickly the organization should push him after a summer of important contract business.
The Canucks have enough center depth that they do not need to rush him, yet the path becomes less simple when a young player starts looking ready before the team wants to make a permanent commitment. Starting the 2026-27 season in the NHL would give Cootes a chance to learn on the fly, while the AHL could offer a steadier runway if the club decides his game still needs more refinement. However Vancouver handles it, the decision will say plenty about how it views his timeline and how much patience it is willing to exercise. [Read more 🡒]
Canucks Face A Telling Scoring Bet Up Front
The Canucks scoring picture up front has a familiar kind of uncertainty attached to it, with Jake DeBrusk and Drew OConnor sitting on very different goal benchmarks as camp and the season approach. DeBrusk brings the more established track record, along with power-play value that can push a winger toward a big number when the usage is right, while OConnor is coming off a role that suggests a more modest scoring ceiling but still enough opportunity to matter in Vancouvers forward mix.
What makes the comparison more interesting is how much both players paths could be shaped by what happens off the ice as much as on it. DeBrusks place in the lineup and his trade status remain part of the conversation, and OConnors contract situation could make him just as relevant to future roster decisions as to the present one. For a team trying to sort out where the goals will come from, the bet up front is as much about stability as it is about production. [Read more 🡒]