Henrik Sedin set off a fresh wave of debate around the Vancouver Canucks on Thursday when he made it clear the club isn’t looking to deal away good players simply for the sake of stockpiling draft picks.
Speaking at the Sedins’ press conference on the Canucks’ season 20 games in, Henrik said the organization’s thinking is bigger than just adding selections.
“We’re not going to trade great players just to get more draft picks,” said Henrik. “Because in the end, you do need to put a better product on the ice and add players to support our young guys coming in.”
That comment landed with plenty of force in a fan base that has been pushing for the team to move every veteran it can, with winger Jake DeBrusk near the top of that list.
DeBrusk is in the third season of the seven-year contract he signed when some viewed Vancouver as a team on the rise and close to contention, not one staring at a reset. And according to Bruce Garrioch of the Toronto Sun, there is real outside interest.
“A league executive says that several clubs have shown interest in forward Jake DeBrusk,” said Garrioch.
Which teams are involved, and what kind of offers are being discussed, remains unclear. But there are a couple of hurdles in the way if Vancouver does decide to move him.
One is contractual. DeBrusk has a full no-movement clause this season, though that changes to a 15-team no-trade list next season. That would make a deal easier to navigate.
Still, the clause may not be the biggest obstacle. DeBrusk won’t request a trade, but it’s widely understood that he would be open to one, which could reduce the impact of the no-move protection.
The larger issue appears to be what Vancouver wants back.
On Halford & Brough, Canucks insider Rick Dhaliwal said the team could have already moved DeBrusk if it had lowered its demands.
“They could have easily traded DeBrusk by now for picks and prospects,” said Dhaliwal. “Easily.
It could have been done. The reason he hasn’t been traded is because they’re obviously holding out for more.”
Dhaliwal also said the Canucks’ offseason asking price was “pretty high,” and that part of the reason is the state of their left side.
“If you get rid of DeBrusk for picks and prospects, go look at the left side of the Vancouver Canucks’ forward group: they’re all bottom-six guys,” said Dhaliwal. “The Canucks are not saying they’re not taking picks and prospects back for DeBrusk, but I think they do want a warm body back: a decent player under the age of 25.”
That kind of language is likely to rattle some fans, since it sounds a lot like the kind of thinking that frustrated people during the Jim Benning years.
So does this mean the Canucks are not serious about a rebuild if they’re unwilling to move DeBrusk for draft capital? Henrik’s comments certainly point in that direction, at least publicly.
But the reality may be more complicated. The fan base is already prepared for some short-term pain if it helps the long-term picture, and the wins and losses this season may matter less than the assets the team can gather for the future.
The draft picks themselves matter because they can turn into the kind of players that change a franchise’s trajectory.
At the same time, what the Canucks say and what they ultimately do may not match up. The Sedins are not going to publicly announce a willingness to strip the roster down while they’re trying to get the group to buy into the system and culture. That would only risk creating problems in the room.
The better way to judge this group is by the moves it makes.
And so far, those moves have leaned heavily toward the future. General manager Ryan Johnson made one of his biggest swings by sending Marcus Pettersson to the New York Rangers for a first-round pick in 2030.
He also moved Nils Höglander for a third-round pick, and dealt a 2026 draft pick to move up in 2027.
Johnson has made only a few trades, but the pattern is already clear. He has added players in just two deals: Brendan Gallagher for future considerations and the Aatu Räty-for-Jacob Quillan swap.
So before getting too worked up over what the Canucks are saying, the real test is still ahead: wait and see what they actually do.
In Other News...
Former Canucks Coach Rick Tocchet Is Facing A Familiar Star Player Backlash
Rick Tocchets first season behind the Flyers bench has already turned into a messy one, and the friction around Matvei Michkov has only added to the noise. Since Tocchet arrived, Michkovs production and ice time have reportedly dipped, and the tension spilled into public view when an on-ice argument between Michkov and a teammate was caught on camera.
Now the backlash has moved beyond the rink, with Flyers fans raising money for a Fire Tocchet. Save Michkov. banner and billboard in Philadelphia. The organization has pushed back on reports that Michkov wants out, but the story has still put Tocchet in the middle of a familiar kind of star-player scrutiny, the sort that can quickly define a coachs early months if the results and the relationship do not line up. [Read more 🡒]
Canucks Face A Pettersson Decision They May Not Afford
The Canucks are trying to thread a difficult needle as they weigh how to reshape the roster without tearing down the parts that still matter. Henrik Sedin said the club is not interested in moving players just to stockpile draft picks, a stance that fits a team trying to stay competitive while also keeping an eye on the future. In that conversation, Elias Pettersson inevitably sits at the center of the discussion, because his age, contract and value make him one of the few players who could bring back a major return.
But Pettersson is also one of the reasons this decision is so complicated. He is the teams leading scorer, and his impact goes beyond offense, with important work in faceoffs and on the penalty kill that would be hard to replace if Vancouver ever seriously entertained a move. His contract and no-movement clause make any trade path even narrower, leaving the Canucks with a franchise-defining question that is easier to ask than answer. [Read more 🡒]
Former Canuck Kiefer Sherwood Just Reopened A Frustrating Vancouver Debate
The Sharks micd-up video from their Oct. 29 game against the Canucks did more than offer a behind-the-scenes look at Kiefer Sherwood. It put a familiar face back in the middle of one of Vancouvers oldest conversations: how much edge is too much, and how much of it the Canucks have been missing when games get tight. Sherwood, now with San Jose, came off as loud, engaged and fully willing to needle former teammates while the game was still in the balance.
For Canucks fans, the clip lands with extra sting because Sherwood did not just talk through the matchup, he helped decide it. He picked up an assist on the Sharks game-winning goal in the comeback victory, turning a former depth piece into part of a reminder Vancouver would probably rather not relive. It is the kind of sequence that can reopen debates about identity, competitiveness and whether the Canucks have enough players willing to drag a game into the kind of fight Sherwood seemed eager to create. [Read more 🡒]