Sportsnet 650’s shutdown is the latest reminder that competition matters, and Canadians are the ones paying the price.
The loss of two locally focused radio stations in Canada’s third-largest city is being driven by the financial logic of Bay Street, and Patrick Johnston argues that should set off alarms. He frames it as a basic question of priorities: local communities or centralized power?
Johnston says that question should have been raised long before Rogers bought Bell’s stake nearly two years ago. He also points back to 2012, when Rogers and Bell joined forces to buy 75 per cent of MLSE, and says the broader pattern has now left Rogers in control of all the big-league teams in Toronto.
Rogers chief executive Tony Staffieri said in a news release this week, “It gives us even more opportunity to invest in championship-calibre teams, create unique experiences for customers and fans, and unlock long-term value for shareholders,” but Johnston says the company’s actions a day later told a different story, when a wave of employees were let go. In his view, the only part of that statement that holds up is the one about shareholders.
He argues that the idea Rogers will somehow improve the Leafs, Raptors, Blue Jays, Argos or Toronto FC while cutting staff “strains credulity.” To him, this is about doing less and making more, not about serving fans or the country.
Johnston also sees the problem as bigger than sports. Rogers’ reach across the Canadian media landscape, he writes, is not healthy for the country’s public conversation. In his view, the consolidation of traditional media has made discourse shallower, less interesting and less vital.
At the same time, he says, new technology has lowered the barriers for people to speak for themselves, and that part is welcome. But he warns against mistaking volume for value. There is still a need for expertise, context and reporting that goes beyond repeating news releases.
He points to the long list of outlets that have disappeared in Vancouver during his career and Justin McElroy’s, including the Georgia Straight, Metro, 24 Hours, the Vancouver Courier, TSN 1040, CKNW and Global as separate operations, and The Sun and The Province as independent of each other. Now, he notes, Sportsnet 650 and News1130 are gone too.
McElroy wrote on Facebook that those outlets were all media organizations in Vancouver that paid decent wages to report on the city, and that they relied on “a code of ethics, training, mentorship, group discussions and sharing of best practices to make sure stories were fair, deeply sourced, and had a big impact while appealing to as large of an audience as possible.”
Johnston says the trend is national and has been fueled mainly by tech companies that have reshaped society around their own bottom lines. He says the country should not hand over control of public conversation to tech billionaires in Silicon Valley or downtown Toronto who are focused on wealth and power.
He also points to the economics of radio. In 2009, he says, Vancouver stations sold about $125 million in ads.
In the modern era, that figure is closer to $50 million. He asks where the missing $75 million went, and answers that most of it ended up with two American tech conglomerates.
That, he says, is not in the national interest.
Johnston argues regulators are supposed to step in when monopolies form, and he questions why the federal government is allowing Rogers to control both the teams and the airwaves while also receiving journalism subsidy money. He notes that his own company takes that money too, but says it is using it to pay salaries and keep people employed.
His conclusion is simple: more competition between media companies and sports teams is better for everyone because it means more jobs and more things to watch, hear and read. He says it is time for the people in charge to fix the problem.
He did hear back from the Competition Bureau. A spokesperson said, “The Bureau may review any merger or acquisition, which includes transactions that are not subject to mandatory pre-merger notification, to protect and promote competition in Canada,” and added that if a problem is found, the matter can be sent to a tribunal that can block the merger.
When asked whether this latest Rogers transaction is being reviewed, the Bureau declined to say. The response was, “The Bureau is required by law to conduct its work in private,” and, “Therefore, I am unable to confirm whether we are reviewing this transaction, nor would it be appropriate to comment further on the matter.”
Johnston closes by calling that “Privacy for the rich guys,” and says it is the people doing the work who are left in the dark.
In Other News...
Blue Jackets Young Core Suddenly Carries More Risk Than Fans Realize
The Blue Jackets young core still looks promising on paper, but the payroll picture is getting harder to ignore. General manager Don Waddell said Kirill Marchenko is expected back next season, yet the long-term cost of keeping him will rise quickly after that, and Columbus is already navigating a contract file with Cole Sillinger after he filed for arbitration. Jet Greaves is in the mix too, which only adds to the sense that the clubs next phase is going to be about more than just developing talent.
For Vancouver, the bigger takeaway is how tightly Columbus is trying to hold onto the pieces it believes in. Sillinger drew interest from the Canucks, but the Blue Jackets valued him enough to keep him out of trade talks, and now his arbitration number becomes part of a larger balancing act. With Marchenko due for a major raise down the road and more young players moving toward expensive decisions, Columbus may be entering the part of the rebuild where keeping the core together gets just as difficult as building it in the first place. [Read more 🡒]
Ducks May Be Headed For Another Costly Frank Vatrano Dilemma
The Ducks are again trying to get creative with Frank Vatranos contract, and Vancouver has at least been part of the conversation. Anaheim reached out to see whether the Canucks would have interest, but any such move runs straight into the reality of Vancouvers current money-in, money-out approach and a budget that leaves little room for taking on extra baggage.
For the Canucks, it is the kind of phone call that makes sense to answer without necessarily going any further. There is always a market for useful scoring help, but this one comes with financial complications that make a fit difficult, and Vancouver is not in a position to overspend just to solve another teams problem. Around the league, the rumor mill is busy in other places too, with Shane Wright and his agent reportedly looking at possible new landing spots, but for Vancouver the bigger question is whether this is simply another name on the board or one that gets any real traction. [Read more 🡒]
Canucks Just Sent A Surprising Message With Luke Schenn Reunion
Luke Schenns return to Vancouver says as much about the Canucks blue-line picture as it does about the veteran himself. The one-year deal gives the club a familiar, steady option after his ice time has already trended down in recent seasons, and it fits a roster that is trying to balance experience with a wave of younger defensemen coming through.
The interesting part is how carefully the Canucks appear to be managing the reunion. Schenn is not being brought back to be a nightly anchor, but as part of a rotation that can be adjusted as needed, which puts more pressure on the right side and on the players trying to claim those minutes. For Filip Hronek, Tom Willander and Victor Mancini, the move adds another layer to an already crowded competition, and it suggests Vancouver is willing to lean on depth even if it means a more controlled role for a player it knows well. [Read more 🡒]