For the Vancouver Canucks, the bigger question heading into 2026-27 isn’t whether Thatcher Demko can be good again. It’s whether even a fully healthy, fully sharp Demko would be enough to drag this roster out of the basement.
The worry is understandable on the surface. A goalie of Demko’s caliber can change games, and Canucks fans have already started thinking through the nightmare version of events: Demko comes back, looks like himself, and accidentally nudges a team that’s widely expected to finish near the bottom into something better than a tank job.
But that fear looks exaggerated.
To make the case, you have to start by imagining the best possible Demko. Not a cautious return.
Not a rusty one. The real thing.
The version who earned a Vezina nomination in 2023-24, when he put up a .918 save percentage and played 51 regular season games, the second-most of his career.
Even that kind of season might not move the needle enough.
Look at Igor Shesterkin last year. The Rangers goalie was excellent again in 2025-26, finishing with a 2.50 goals against average and a .912 save percentage.
He even picked up two second-place Vezina votes and landed seventh in the voting. And yet New York still collapsed to third-to-last in the standings and ended up with the fifth overall pick.
Shesterkin was in net for 51 starts, and the Rangers still absorbed 19 of their regulation losses and six of their shootout/overtime losses with him in goal. Jonathan Quick’s .891 save percentage in 25 games didn’t help, but the broader point still stands: elite goaltending can matter a lot and still not save a bad team from itself.
Chicago offered another example. Spencer Knight gave the Blackhawks a respectable season in 55 games, posting a 2.82 GAA and a .902 save percentage, and they still finished second-to-last.
Not every bottom-five club got strong work in net. Calgary’s Dustin Wolf had a down year, and Toronto’s goaltending wasn’t especially good. But some teams did get quality goaltending and still landed right where the Canucks are expected to be.
That’s where goals-saved-above-average, or GSAA, gives the discussion a little more texture. The stat tries to estimate how many goals a goalie truly prevented based on the shots he faced, and while it isn’t perfect, it often lines up better with what you see on the ice.
Calgary backup Devin Cooley had a standout year by that measure. In 31 appearances, he not only outperformed Wolf, he posted a 17.3 GSAA, seventh-best in the league.
That worked out to roughly 17 goals shaved off Calgary’s total, and even then the Flames didn’t come close to being a playoff team. Cooley finished 10-10-6, which was a bit better than the team as a whole, but not remotely enough to change the big picture.
Demko has already shown he can hit that kind of impact number. In 2023-24, his GSAA was 22.0, second only to Connor Hellebuyck.
So if you drop that version of Demko back into Vancouver, what changes? The Canucks were minus-100 as a team last season. Add back 22 goals and they’re still minus-78, which would still leave them 16 goals worse than the second-worst team.
There’s also the temptation to focus on Vancouver’s league-leading 43 one-goal losses from last season and assume a few extra stops from Demko could swing the standings. Maybe in theory.
But even if he somehow erased 22 goals specifically in those games, and every one of them turned into an extra point, the Canucks would still be stuck near the bottom and well outside the playoff picture. And that’s the best-case version of the math, not the realistic one.
Hockey-Reference’s goalie point share adds another layer. Demko’s 2023-24 point share was listed at 10.7. Even if you simply slapped 10.7 points onto the 2025-26 Canucks, they would still finish last.
And the roster around him doesn’t suggest a safety net. Vancouver still has a very young blue line, and this season they won’t even have a quarter-season of Quinn Hughes in the mix. Up front, the forward group is still one of the thinnest in the league.
So yes, a healthy Demko could steal a game or two. That part is easy to believe. But if the Canucks end up close enough to the edge that his play alone determines whether they finish in the basement, then something else on the roster has already gone very differently.
At this point, Demko probably isn’t the obstacle to the tank. And there’s not much reason to think he’d be the thing that saves it either.
In Other News...
Canucks Future Core Debate Just Got A Lot More Real
Bill Dalys comment that a new NHL franchise could be ready to begin play as early as the 2029-30 season puts the leagues next expansion cycle on a clearer track, with Houston viewed as the priority market and Austin standing by as an alternative. For Vancouver, the bigger ripple is not the market itself but what comes next: an expansion draft that would force the Canucks to start sorting their future core well before the usual time for that kind of debate.
Elias Petterssons no-movement clause would shape part of that conversation automatically, and the rest of the protected list would likely center on the younger players the Canucks hope to build around. The tricky part is deciding where the line falls between preserving long-term pieces and using one of those protection spots on more established talent, a question that suddenly feels a lot less abstract with expansion no longer a distant what-if. [Read more 🡒]
Canucks Face Two Huge Questions Around Demko And hgren
The Canucks are headed into the season with two very different but equally important questions tied to upside and durability. Liam hgrens path is about whether his growth can turn into a real scoring step forward after a partial season that hinted at more, especially for a team that has been looking for more offense across the board. For Vancouver, a young forward reaching that kind of production would matter not just as a number, but as part of the broader effort to ease the burden on a lineup that has struggled to generate enough.
At the other end of the roster, Thatcher Demkos situation is about health first and workload second. He is working back from hip surgery, and even before you get to the recovery timeline, the bigger issue is whether his body can handle the grind of a 40-start season given his injury history. The Canucks know what Demko means when he is available, but the uncertainty around how much he can take on leaves them waiting on a question that could shape the entire season. [Read more 🡒]
Jim Rutherford Leaves Canucks Fans Debating How This Era Will Be Remembered
Jim Rutherfords run in Vancouver is heading toward its end, with the Canucks president of hockey operations saying he will step down after the 2026 entry draft and shift into an advisory role. It closes a four-season stretch that has given the organization some real moments to build on, while also leaving plenty of debate about the direction the club took under his watch.
Rutherfords time with the Canucks was never simple to sort into neat wins and losses, and that is part of what makes his departure such a tricky one to assess. Several controversial decisions and public comments shaped how the team was viewed inside the room and outside it, leaving fans to weigh the successes against the friction and uncertainty that came with them. [Read more 🡒]