The Senate’s latest version of the Protect College Sports Act keeps the bill’s core structure intact, but it makes one of the biggest pressure points in college athletics a lot less rigid: conference realignment.
Released Thursday night, the revised text backs away from the earlier freeze on movement between power conferences and instead creates a six-year window in which schools can switch more freely. That change matters because it lands right in the middle of the next major round of TV negotiations for college sports.
The Senate voted 77-22 on Thursday to advance the bill toward debate and possible final passage next week. Even if it clears the Senate, it still has a rough path ahead, and growing doubt now suggests the House won’t take it up before November.
The updated bill still includes the $22.5 million retention fund for schools, paired with a revenue-sharing cap of $21.6 million for the 2026-27 academic year. But the realignment language drew the sharpest revision after power conferences pushed back on the original version this summer.
Under the earlier text, a school would have needed to spend five years as an independent before joining another power conference. The new version trims that to three years as an independent or as a member of a conference earning less than $700 million annually in revenue. Then comes the key wrinkle: that rule sunsets after six years.
So if the bill becomes law, programs would eventually be able to leave a power conference - or any conference with $700 million in annual revenue - and join another without sitting through a mandatory three-year waiting period outside the power structure. The conferences would still be capped at 19 members, which leaves the Big Ten room for one more school and the SEC room for up to three.
The bill also keeps a broader restriction aimed at stopping a breakaway super league. Outside investors, including private equity groups, still cannot buy up power-conference schools to build one. And a school that leaves the SEC would remain off limits to league builders for five years, with that rule never expiring.
The timing is the real story here. If the bill is signed into law, the six-year realignment provision would expire around 2032 or 2033, right in the middle of a wave of media-rights deadlines that shape the sport’s future.
Those dates line up with the Big Ten’s 2030 renewal, the Big 12’s in 2031, the NCAA men’s basketball tournament and College Football Playoff in 2032, the SEC in 2034 and the ACC in 2036.
That gives the bill a very specific footprint: it fences off realignment for the next stretch of college athletics, but it lifts before the biggest contracts are all on the table.
The logic behind that timing is impossible to miss. Realignment in this era has followed television money, and in the 2020s that money reshaped the map. Oregon, UCLA, USC and Washington moved to the Big Ten, while the Big 12 added four former Pac-12 schools after OU and Texas left for the SEC.
The new bill also leaves in place protections against some of the huge exit-fee barriers that have kept schools such as Clemson and Florida State from making a move out of the ACC, a situation that sparked litigation before being settled. The ACC has since adjusted its exit fee structure, dropping the penalty from $165 million to a flat $75 million by 2030 - a timeline that fits neatly within the bill’s six-year window.
There are other notable changes in the new text as well.
The $22.5 million retention fund, which was important in winning over the Big Ten and SEC in August, now comes with a new condition: schools that do not meet graduation-rate and academic-progress benchmarks lose access to the fund entirely. The bill does not spell out those standards, leaving that to the NCAA and the conferences.
The revised version also gives athletes a faster path to court in certain cases. The bill usually requires plaintiffs to give 30 days’ notice and time for a fix before filing suit, but that waiting period disappears for claims involving physical injury, death, or sexual abuse or misconduct.
And the bill narrows the state laws it preempts. The August draft wiped out state rules across its entire eligibility section.
The new text only covers four areas: student status, academic requirements, professional status and years of eligibility. States still keep more authority over issues like drug testing, gambling and campus conduct rules.
The revised bill also says states, schools and conferences can set tougher health and safety standards than the federal minimum, while putting the NCAA in charge of making sure members comply. Medical coverage rules are now clearly treated as a floor, not a ceiling.
A few other provisions remain intact. The bill still shields the five-year eligibility limit and the House settlement’s pay cap from older lawsuits, while preserving past damages claims.
The commission created by the bill now has a new job too: it will study whether athletes should be able to hold a financial stake tied to their program’s value. Its safety review must also look at athlete injuries and deaths, along with whether campus health officers can truly report independently.
In Other News...
USC Might Be Closing In On Another Major Local Defensive Win
USC has spent plenty of time trying to strengthen its defensive future in Southern California, and the next local name to watch is already drawing serious attention. Rivals national recruiting analysts Adam Gorney and Greg Biggins the Trojans the leading favorite to land four-star safety Ace Leutele from Mater Dei in the 2028 class, a notable position for a program that has made keeping elite local talent home a priority.
Leutele stands out not just because of where he plays, but because of how early he has risen at one of the regions most demanding programs. He is a rare freshman starter at Mater Dei and is regarded as a versatile defensive piece, the kind of player USC wants to keep stacking into its next recruiting cycle. The Trojans are also pursuing other safety targets as they look to build a stronger 2028 group after a smaller 2027 class, so this is only part of a broader push on the back end. [Read more 🡒]
USC Has A New Debate Over Which Trojans Deserve Bigger Roles
Three games into the season, USC already has one of those early-depth-chart conversations that tends to follow a team with real expectations. The evaluation around the Trojans has started to separate the players whose roles seem to be growing from the ones who have not quite matched the opportunity in front of them, with King Miller and Luke Wafle among the names trending up as the staff sorts out who can handle more.
Waymond Jordan and Kam Crawford sit on the other side of that ledger, which makes the next stretch worth watching for a team trying to sharpen its rotation before the schedule gets more demanding. For USC, this is the kind of internal debate that can quietly shape the rest of a season, because bigger roles do not always go to the most obvious candidates, and the opening month has already created a few decisions worth tracking. [Read more 🡒]
USC Heads Into Big Ten Play With Serious Depth Questions
USCs transition into Big Ten play arrives with more uncertainty than the Trojans would like, and the timing could hardly be worse. As they get ready for Rutgers, the injury list is already shaping the conversation around the roster, with star freshman receiver Trent Mosley out for an extended stretch after a knee injury in Week 2.
The concern does not stop there, either. Several other players, including Jahkeem Stewart, Nela Tupou, Dee Reddick, Madden Riordan and Jadyn Walker, are dealing with injuries or are in question for the opener, leaving the Trojans to manage depth issues as the level of competition ramps up. For a team about to find out what life looks like in a new conference, availability may be the first major test. [Read more 🡒]