Steve Simmons didn’t spend much time pretending Darren Ferris’s latest comments deserved a soft landing.
After Ferris, Mitch Marner’s agent, told The PuckPedia Hockey Show that his client was never “protected by his organization” in Toronto, Simmons pushed back hard in a follow-up conversation with E.J. Hradek on the Toronto Sports Rush podcast.
Ferris had pointed to Marner not getting bonuses a decade ago and not being considered for the captaincy as part of his complaint. Simmons, though, treated the whole thing like a chapter that should have stayed closed.
He called the Marner situation “dead” until Ferris reopened it, and he made clear he thought the winger had just finished a strong run with the Maple Leafs. Marner spent nine seasons in Toronto, was among the top-five paid players in the NHL and ranked among the top-ten scorers. “I mean, it was a pretty darn good run, and they can not let this thing go,” Simmons said.
He went even further from there. Simmons took issue with Ferris raising the issue at all, and with Marner not speaking up himself if there was truly a grievance to air.
His argument was blunt: the idea of mistreatment didn’t hold up when measured against the salary, the production and the role Marner had in Toronto. “I would love to be mistreated the way he was mistreated.
I would love to have that salary coming in, and nine years of incredible success. The first hundred-point winger in team history and two first all-star teams.”
Simmons also rejected the notion that Toronto failed to shield Marner. He pointed to the kind of on-ice support Marner had, including protection from players like Ryan Reeves and Wayne Simmonds.
He also noted that Marner played on the team’s first line and logged more forward minutes than anyone but Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl during his time with the Leafs. “They put him in every situation to try and succeed.
On the first power play, on the first line with the best center. It's baffling to me.
It's mindboggling,” Simmons said. He urged Marner and Ferris to leave the rest behind and move on with his fresh start in Vegas.
The conversation also circled back to one of the old points of tension between Marner’s camp and Auston Matthews: the rookie-contract bonuses. Simmons said Marner did not receive them, while Matthews did, and he noted that this happened four general managers ago. He questioned why Ferris would risk looking “absolutely foolish” by dragging that back up now, especially with Marner having made so much money as a Leaf.
Hradek, for his part, said he couldn’t understand why such a small piece of money would still matter years later, especially since it was Ferris speaking rather than Marner. That, he suggested, made it seem more like an agent’s issue than the player’s.
Simmons then moved into what he described as the family side of the story. He said there was “something odd about what I'll call the Marner group,” and called Ferris, Marner and his family a “very strange mix of people who do everything in the world to supposedly protect Mitch.” In Simmons’s view, their efforts often had the opposite effect.
He said Marner’s father had been doing that for years in Toronto through conversations with reporters and others. “He always thought Mitch was getting screwed by somebody over something,” Simmons said.
Simmons also recounted a story about Paul Marner inviting people to watch a Leafs game, only to be bothered afterward by how many of the guests were wearing Matthews jerseys instead of Marner jerseys. He said the family spent a lot of time passing negative clippings along to Marner during his Toronto years.
By the end, Simmons dismissed the whole dynamic as childish. He called it “like high school,” comparing the Leafs-Marner split to a breakup that never really gets processed. “In this case, it's ten years later, and he still hasn't gotten over, you know, hasn't gotten over the signing of this thing,” said Simmons.
In Other News...
Easton Cowan Is Chasing Something Leafs Fans Have Waited To See
Easton Cowan has already built a rare postseason rsum before even settling into the NHL conversation in Toronto. He won the Memorial Cup with the London Knights in 2025, then added the Calder Cup with the Toronto Marlies in 2026, giving Leafs fans a glimpse of a prospect who has been around winning from the start.
Now there is a chance for something even stranger, and maybe unprecedented, if the Maple Leafs can finish the job in 2027. A Stanley Cup would give Cowan three straight championships in three different seasons, a run that is notable enough on its own and unusual enough that it is not even clear whether anyone has pulled it off before. [Read more 🡒]
Easton Cowan Suddenly Faces A Brutal Leafs Reality
The Maple Leafs spent the offseason piling up forward depth, and it has already made the picture around Easton Cowan a lot less straightforward. Toronto brought in Nick Paul, Colton Sissons, Brandon Duhaime and Teddy Blueger, then added Gavin McKenna in the draft, all while Jack Roslovic is projected to fit into a top-six role. For a young winger trying to force his way into the mix, that kind of added competition changes the math quickly.
Cowan still has a path, but it may hinge on what he does in training camp and how quickly he can show he belongs against a deeper group of NHL options. If the Leafs decide he needs more reps and more confidence before carving out a role, the AHL could be the most realistic next stop. For now, his challenge is less about talent than timing, with Torontos roster leaving very little room to learn on the job. [Read more 🡒]
Maple Leafs Suddenly Look Like A Team Fans Should Fear Again
After missing the playoffs, the Maple Leafs have had a full offseason to rest, reset and reshape the roster for 2026-27. The headlining addition is rookie Gavin McKenna, but Toronto also brought in a group that adds depth and experience in different spots, including Nick Paul, Colton Sissons, Jack Roslovic, Brandon Duhaime, defenseman Darren Raddysh and goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky.
It is the kind of broad roster makeover that can change the feel of a team quickly, especially for a club coming off a year that fell short of expectations. On paper, the mix gives Toronto more options up front, more stability on the back end and a new look in goal, which is enough to make the Leafs appear far more dangerous than they did a season ago, even if the real answer still has to wait for the games to start. [Read more 🡒]