Auston Matthews is not at a decision point yet, but the clock is loud enough now that the conversation has started anyway.
Cale Makar’s record-setting eight-year extension has already spilled into the biggest Leafs question sitting just off in the distance: what happens when Toronto has to decide whether it’s willing to do something similar for Matthews? After that deal, a poll asking whether the Maple Leafs would hand Matthews a comparable contract to keep him in Toronto through the end of his career came back with a hard no from 84% of respondents.
That reaction set off a deeper debate on TSN’s First Up, where the discussion turned on the idea of an eight-year, $20 million-a-year deal for Matthews. “Do you want Auston Matthews to be here and finish his career as a Maple Leaf, because that's the deal” was the framing, and plenty of fans quickly made clear they weren’t buying it.
There’s a reason the hesitation is so strong. For Toronto, an eight-year commitment to Matthews would be a massive swing, one that would run him out to age 37.
With his declining production and injury history, it’s not a clean or easy call. The Maple Leafs may absolutely want him to retire in blue and white, but locking in that much term brings real risk.
The production piece matters too. Matthews may never hit 50 goals in a season again.
Without Mitch Marner, that possibility looks even slimmer. If he’s sitting in the 27- to 33-goal range instead, the question becomes whether he’s still a $20 million player.
That’s where the argument gets uncomfortable fast.
First Up pushed back on the fan response by pointing out the contradiction at the heart of it. The hosts argued that plenty of the same people saying no now will be the ones angry later if Matthews leaves.
Their point was simple: fans may not want to pay the price, but in a rising cap world, keeping a player with Matthews’s pedigree comes with a cost. “The players have control, man,” one host said.
There’s also the bigger team picture, which the poll didn’t really capture. Matthews remains central to everything Toronto is trying to do.
The Maple Leafs went all in this summer, making changes in management and coaching, reshaping the roster, and drafting Gavin McKenna No. 1 overall. This is not a franchise acting like it’s taking a step back.
That leaves the other path: if Toronto isn’t willing to pay Matthews what the market demands, then the team has to think about trading him. He has only this season and next left on his current deal, so the Maple Leafs would need to move before the situation gets away from them. If they aren’t prepared to meet a number that could land near Makar money, then they’d have to recover value in a blockbuster deal rather than risk losing him for nothing.
That’s why the poll may have missed the real question. The follow-up matters just as much: if you’re not willing to give Matthews the kind of money Makar just got, are you willing to trade him instead?
“Pick a side,” the hosts argued.
Because with a player like Matthews, this isn’t really a simple yes-or-no exercise. Saying no to the contract is only the first step.
In Other News...
Leafs Prospects Are Already Sending A Message Before Camp
Before training camp even opens, the Maple Leafs are already getting a look at the kind of work that can shape a season. Gavin McKenna and Ben Danford were spotted practicing in Muskoka alongside John Tavares, Morgan Rielly, Scott Laughton, and Mitch Marner, a summer setting that carries real significance for two prospects trying to make their way into Torontos long-term picture. For young players, those reps are about more than just staying sharp. They are a chance to see the pace, habits, and expectations that come with being around established NHL talent.
For Toronto, the setting is especially interesting because it gives McKenna and Danford a chance to start building chemistry with current Leafs while absorbing details from veterans who know what it takes to hold down a role in this market. Summer ice time does not decide anything on its own, but it can help a prospect stand out before the real competition begins. If either player is going to push into a bigger future role, moments like these are where the first impression starts to form. [Read more 🡒]
Maple Leafs Just Made A Goalie Bet That Could Haunt Matthews Window
The Maple Leafs have added another high-profile piece to their goaltending picture, signing veteran Sergei Bobrovsky to a three-year, $21 million contract with a $7 million average annual value. It is the kind of move that signals urgency, and it also comes with the sort of risk Toronto has tried to avoid in the past: a long-term commitment to an older goalie on a deal built to matter right away.
Because of NHL 35-plus contract rules and Bobrovskys full no-movement clause, the Leafs wont have much wiggle room if the fit goes sideways. The timing makes it more delicate, too, since the deal runs into Auston Matthews final contracted season and could tighten the clubs cap flexibility right when the front office needs it most. [Read more 🡒]
Maple Leafs Still Have One Quiet Roster Decision Before Camp
The Maple Leafs have already done plenty of their offseason reshaping, but there is still a subtle layer to sort out before camp opens. With the roster taking shape, the next moves look less about headline additions and more about padding the depth chart, especially if the club wants a little more insurance on the blue line and among its bottom-six forwards.
One path would be inviting a few familiar or useful veterans into camp on PTOs, giving Toronto a closer look without committing to a full-season answer too soon. A depth defenseman like Carson Soucy fits that idea, and so do possible forward reunions with James van Riemsdyk or Michael Bunting, but the bigger question is whether any of those names can make the Leafs more comfortable with the margins of the roster before opening night arrives. [Read more 🡒]