The Maple Leafs could be staring at a loaded 2027 free-agent class, but that doesn’t mean they should start planning the next Auston Matthews fix just yet.
Yes, the names are big. Sidney Crosby, Jason Robertson, Quinn Hughes, and Alex Debrincat are all set to become free agents in 2027, and that alone makes July 1 look crowded with star power.
But even with those players technically eligible for unrestricted free agency, the expectation is that most of the elite names - including Makar, Kucherov, and Hughes - will end up extending with their current teams. Jim Nill has already said Robertson’s contract will be discussed later.
That’s the trap Toronto has to avoid. The temptation is obvious: if this season goes sideways, the Leafs will be desperate to give Matthews another high-end running mate. But chasing that idea too aggressively could leave the team boxed in when the real priority should be keeping options open.
The price tag on that kind of talent is enormous. Kucherov is currently on a $9.5 million deal, and Robertson just signed a one-year, $12 million contract so he could focus on this season and cash in later, fresh off a 45-goal, 96-point year.
Either player would help Toronto up front. Makar would be even more dramatic, a franchise-changing defenseman who would instantly upgrade the blue line and help Matthews in an indirect way.
But he still wouldn’t solve the Leafs’ right-wing problem on his own.
The bigger issue is cost. These players have built their careers with their current clubs, and it’s hard to imagine teams like Tampa Bay and Colorado letting cornerstone talent walk or underpaying to keep them.
If Toronto wanted to chase one of those names, it would likely need to clear a massive amount of money to handle an AAV in the $15 million to $18 million range. That would probably mean stripping down the roster in a serious way.
And even then, the math gets tight fast. Toronto is already looking at a projected $6.75 million in cap space for 2027, and that doesn’t leave much room if the Leafs also need to think about Matthews’ next contract or the stars who could be available in 2028, including Connor McDavid.
The Leafs do have some flexibility, but not enough to build a shopping list around the league’s biggest names.
At the moment, Toronto doesn’t have many true albatross contracts. William Nylander’s $11.5 million salary is justified by what he produces, and Darren Raddysh’s deal looks like a strong investment if he keeps building on his breakout 2025-26 season. But those contracts still limit how much the Leafs can swing at star talent.
There are other moves that could free up room. Morgan Rielly carries a $7.5 million cap hit, while Max Domi at $3.75 million, Dakota Joshua at $3.25 million, and Chris Tanev at $4.5 million are all players who could be moved to create space and clear out some congestion up front.
That would help financially, but it would also come with real roster costs. Toronto would be losing a shutdown defender in Tanev, who remains strong despite health concerns, and Rielly, for all his defensive issues, still brings offense.
That could leave the Leafs with four more holes to fill.
So the picture is pretty clear: Toronto needs cap flexibility, not a fantasy lineup of future free agents. The organization does have one advantage, though - everyone is locked up through 2027, which gives the Leafs stability even if it limits their ability to add another star.
If Matthews still isn’t getting the help he needs this season, Toronto may have to rethink the entire approach. But the club can’t head into the summer of 2027 banking on finding the perfect partner for its captain.
If Matthews is gone by then, the plan falls apart anyway. As appealing as that elite 2027 fit might sound, the Leafs can’t afford to build around a possibility that may never matter.
In Other News...
Steve Simmons Just Reopened The Ugliest Part Of The Marner Saga
Mitch Marners exit from Toronto was never going to fade quietly, and a fresh round of comments from his agent has only dragged the conversation back into the open. Darren Ferris recently blasted the Maple Leafs for how Marner was handled during his time with the club, pointing to concerns like missing bonuses and the fact that Marner was never seriously considered for the captaincy, which set off another familiar debate about how the organization managed one of its biggest stars.
Steve Simmons of the Toronto Sun then stepped in to push back, arguing that Marner did pretty well in Toronto by any reasonable measure and questioning why these complaints are surfacing now. Simmons also revisited long-discussed friction between Marner and Auston Matthews, while weaving in anecdotes about Marners family life, keeping the focus on just how messy the old relationship still looks whenever someone decides to reopen it. [Read more 🡒]
Maple Leafs Stir Trade Buzz As Veterans Tip Balance
The Maple Leafs have spent plenty of time trying to thread the needle between youth and experience, and that theme has come into sharper focus with Sergei Bobrovsky drawing attention as the sort of veteran presence that can steady a team when the games matter most. Around the league, the rise of younger players has changed how clubs build, but the playoff picture still tends to reward teams that can lean on seasoned hands and the habits that come with them.
Toronto is watching that balance closely because the same logic is driving trade chatter elsewhere, too. If the Winnipeg Jets ever decide to reset, Edmonton could be in the market for Mark Scheifele, and the kind of package that would make sense in that scenario would only underscore how much value contenders still place on established talent. For the Leafs, it is another reminder that the path to spring success often runs through veteran depth, even as the league keeps getting younger. [Read more 🡒]
Maple Leafs First McKenna Look Suddenly Feels Less Straightforward
The first real glimpse of Gavin McKenna in Maple Leafs colors may not come as neatly as expected. As he works through the transition from Penn State to a full-time role with Toronto, his participation in the Prospect Showcase is still uncertain, and he has made it clear that a few basic details around his next step remain unsettled. Even something as simple as where he will be living in Toronto has not been finalized yet.
For a fan base eager to see how he fits into the organization, the timing matters. If McKenna misses the showcase, his first game action with the Leafs could shift to the preseason, where the pace and competition are a little less forgiving and the spotlight tends to sharpen quickly. It is not exactly the clean introduction Toronto had in mind, but it is the sort of early wrinkle that can shape the first impression of a highly watched prospect. [Read more 🡒]