The College Football Playoff is on the verge of another massive overhaul, and this one could reshape the sport in ways that go far beyond the bracket. According to Pete Thamel, the playoff is nearing an agreement to expand from 12 teams to 24 for the 2027 season.
For Baylor and the rest of the Big 12, that sounds like a path to more postseason chances. But the tradeoff is hard to miss: more access, less meaning in the regular season.
I’ve been watching football since the Power-I-formation dominated the landscape. I’ve seen dynasties rise and fall, the air raid take hold, the read option spread from the shotgun, and the playoff evolve from the BCS to four teams to 12.
I’m open to change. I’m also not eager to watch the regular season lose even more of its weight.
There was a time when an undefeated season stood as the gold standard for a national title run. That’s not the reality anymore.
Now two-loss and even three-loss teams can land on level footing with teams that never lost. And with conference realignment continuing to reshape the sport, it’s not even rare to imagine multiple undefeated teams sitting inside the same league.
A 24-team field might help settle the national championship debate more cleanly. It could also make the whole ranking process messier than ever.
The numbers make the case for just how wide this format could reach. If a 24-team playoff had existed since the CFP began in 2014, 80 teams would have appeared by now.
Alabama and Ohio State would have made it every single season since then. Clemson would have been in 11 times, Notre Dame 10, Utah eight, and Baylor four.
That Baylor note matters, especially when looking back at the 2021 Big 12 champion that finished 11-1. If that team had been given a place in a 24-team field, it opens the door to some fascinating what-ifs.
Were they the best team in the country? A format like this would have had a real shot at answering that.
Still, the larger issue is what a 24-team playoff would do to the sport around the bracket. The source of the change is hard to ignore: this is about money.
More media rights. More inventory.
More games that can be sold, packaged, and monetized.
There’s also the question of how the field would actually be chosen. It isn’t clear whether the new setup would require automatic spots from each conference or operate as a straight top-24 free-for-all.
Looking back at a hypothetical 24-team bracket for 2025 makes the concern even clearer. A field that large would not be packed with elite teams from top to bottom. Some early matchups would look a lot like conference championship rematches, and repeat games from title weekends could show up right away.
That’s the promise and the problem with this kind of expansion. The perennial powers would benefit.
Smaller programs could still break through from time to time. But the climb from No. 24 to No. 1 is still a long one, and the sport would have to decide whether more access is worth what it takes away.
In Other News...
Texas Techs Arizona State Rematch Comes With A New Offensive Twist
The No. 10 Red Raiders head into Homecoming week with a familiar opponent and a slightly different offensive look. Texas Tech gets Arizona State at home on FOX, but the bigger personnel note is that running back Cameron Dickey will sit out with an ankle sprain, forcing the offense to lean on other backs to help carry the workload in a game that already carries a little extra spotlight.
Thomas Castellanos recent eligibility ruling adds another layer to the matchup and gives Texas Tech another option as it sorts through the game plan for the rematch. For a team trying to keep its momentum rolling in front of a home crowd, the question is how smoothly the offense can adapt if it has to adjust on the fly against an Arizona State defense that already knows some of the familiar patterns. [Read more 🡒]