Texas has become the latest college program to run headfirst into the fast-changing world of sports wagering, and the issue is bigger than one school. As prediction markets and other alternative betting products spread, compliance departments are being forced to sort out a mess that did not exist at this scale a few years ago.
According to records obtained by Horns247, Texas self-reported seven Level III NCAA violations tied to sports wagering from January through August. The cases stretched across the athletic department, touching football, women’s soccer, men’s track and field, and staff members. None of the wagers involved Texas athletic events, and no single bet was more than $1,000.
One of the clearest signs of where the confusion is coming from is Kalshi, the prediction-market platform that was reportedly connected to six of the seven violations. Texas does not permit traditional sports betting, but that has not stopped some athletes and staff members from apparently assuming that products like Kalshi or daily fantasy-style games sit outside NCAA rules.
They do not. NCAA policy bars student-athletes and many athletic department employees from sports wagering, even if the platform is legal in a given state.
Texas officials also found one case involving a football player who wagered a little more than $34 on college and professional basketball. The university reported that matter through its compliance process.
The problem has grown enough that conferences are leaning harder into monitoring. SEC schools are required to use ProhiBet, a compliance system built to flag wagering activity involving student-athletes and athletic department personnel. It has become a more valuable tool as legal and semi-legal betting options keep multiplying.
For Big 12 schools, and really for college sports as a whole, the Texas situation is a warning sign. The rulebook is not changing as quickly as the betting market is, and that gap is creating fresh headaches for compliance staffs trying to keep up.
In Texas’ case, the episode looks more like a matter of education and awareness than serious misconduct. But it still shows how prediction markets, fantasy contests, and other wagering-adjacent products are reshaping the compliance landscape across the sport.
In Other News...
Texas Landed A 2027 Back With Exactly The Mindset Fans Want
Landen Williams-Callis gave Texas another reason to feel good about its 2027 recruiting class, and not just because the Longhorns beat out Texas A&M for the four-star running back. The Houston-area standout put together a massive 2025 season, setting the single-season touchdown record with 61 total scores, a level of production that immediately turned him into one of the most talked-about backs in the state.
What should stand out even more to Texas fans is the way Williams-Callis carries himself. He has made it clear he wants his attention on what happens between the lines rather than the praise that comes with it, a mindset that fits the kind of edge programs like Texas want from a young playmaker. And with his record-setting season already putting him ahead of several notable Aggies backs on Houston's all-time touchdown list, there is plenty of intrigue left in how high his game can go once he gets to Austin. [Read more 🡒]
Texas Self-Reported Betting Violations That Raise Bigger Questions For Longhorns
The University of Texas has spent much of the year dealing with a series of self-reported NCAA Level III violations tied to sports wagering, a run of issues that stretched from January through August and touched multiple corners of the athletic department. The cases involved members of the football program, womens soccer, mens track and field, and athletic department employees, with the wagers placed on the prediction market website Kalshi.
The fallout has already been real, with some of the people involved declared ineligible or terminated after the violations came to light. What makes the situation especially notable for Texas is not just the number of incidents, but the breadth of the programs affected, a reminder that betting rules now sit squarely in the daily compliance picture for every major campus. [Read more 🡒]
Texas Draws A Hard Line In Its Uniform Debate
Uniform debates have a way of flaring up around Texas, where tradition carries as much weight as anything on the field, and athletic director Chris Del Conte has made it clear the Longhorns are not chasing every social-media concept that pops up. The program is staying with its familiar burnt orange look, even as fans continue to float ideas for an all-black alternate that would give the wardrobe a much different edge.
For now, the Longhorns are keeping any changes modest and firmly in the category of polish rather than reinvention. The only adjustment noted for 2026 is a small SEC logo move to the jersey collar, a reminder that Texas is willing to make tiny tweaks while drawing a hard line on the bigger uniform shift many supporters still want to see. [Read more 🡒]