Ohio State is still sitting at No. 1 in ESPN’s Football Power Index, even after Texas beat the Buckeyes head-to-head on Saturday.
That decision is exactly the kind of thing that keeps the FPI in the middle of the college football conversation. The predictive model had Texas at No. 1 entering the matchup, then knocked the Longhorns back to No. 2 after the win and pushed Ohio State into the top spot instead.
For fans used to traditional rankings, that looks upside down. For the FPI, it fits the system.
The key is that the model is not built to work like the AP Top 25 or the Coaches Poll. ESPN describes it as a predictive tool, something closer to a betting line than a pure ranking. It is designed to forecast how many points a team would be expected to win or lose by against an average opponent on a neutral field.
In other words, it is less interested in who won last week than in who it thinks would win next week.
Each team gets offensive, defensive, and special teams ratings based on expected points added, and the final number reflects how much better or worse a team is than an average FBS program. The model folds in past scores, recent performance, returning starters, and recruiting data, then updates daily with new game results. From there, it runs the rest of the season through 20,000 simulations to project wins and playoff odds.
That’s why Texas’ one-point home win did not automatically mean a rise in the model. The FPI took venue into account, along with the fact that home teams are generally treated as having a three-point edge. Since Texas was only a 1.5-point favorite at home, the computer essentially viewed Ohio State as the slightly stronger team on a neutral field.
The efficiency numbers backed that up in the model’s eyes. Ohio State averaged 5.9 yards per play, while Texas averaged 4.3. So even though the Longhorns got the win, the Buckeyes graded out better on a down-by-down basis.
What fans remember is the finish. Ohio State blew a 20-point lead, gave up 21 unanswered points, missed a field goal, and threw a game-losing interception.
The computer remembers the efficiency. And based on that, it says Ohio State would probably win a slim majority of the time if the teams played 100 times on a neutral field.
Of course, they played the one that mattered, and Texas won it. That result is the one College Football Playoff selectors will have in front of them this December.
In Other News...
Texas Just Delivered The Kind Of Win That Changes Everything
A September showdown with Ohio State ended up looking like the kind of early-season measuring stick Texas has spent years chasing, and it came with a comeback that instantly put the Longhorns in the center of the national conversation. The victory also carried the sort of reach that only high-end marquee games can produce, with television numbers that reflected just how many people wanted to see these teams meet.
The backdrop matters because this was not just a one-off upset or a tidy nonconference win. Several college football and program records fell along the way, giving Texas a result that resonated well beyond the final score and hinted at how quickly the mood around the season can change when a game of this size breaks the right way. [Read more 🡒]
Jeff Traylor Keeps Producing Talent Texas Fans Know All Too Well
Jeff Traylor has built UTSA into one of the Group of Sixs more reliable talent factories, and that reputation keeps resonating far beyond San Antonio. The Roadrunners have watched plenty of players move on through the transfer portal to Power Four programs, a sign that Traylor and his staff have become adept at spotting and developing prospects before bigger schools come calling.
Trey Moore is one of the clearest examples of that pipeline at work. He arrived at UTSA as an unheralded prospect, grew into a productive player under Traylor, and then kept climbing from there, eventually landing at Texas before continuing his rise to the next level. For Longhorn fans, it is another reminder that Traylor has a knack for identifying talent that can travel well once it leaves his program. [Read more 🡒]
Oregon Is Chasing College Footballs Elite With A Price Tag Few Can Match
College footballs financial arms race keeps getting louder, and a new Athletic report on roster spending puts the sports biggest players into sharper focus. The survey identifies 11 programs spending around $40 million or more annually, with Ohio State out front and Oregon close behind, while Texas and LSU sit in that same upper tier of heavy investment. Even in a landscape where some lower-profile programs are working with far smaller budgets, the gap at the top keeps widening.
For Texas, the takeaway is less about a surprise than a reminder of where the Longhorns now live in the sport. The report places them among the teams operating at or near the top of the spending board, in the same conversation as the Buckeyes and Ducks, which helps explain why the stakes around roster building have become so high. The broader question, though, is whether that level of spending can translate into the kind of playoff consistency the biggest checkbooks are clearly chasing. [Read more 🡒]