Sonny Dykes isn’t buying the idea that the U.S. Senate is about to ride in and rescue college sports.
The TCU head coach, who grew up in a football family with a head football coach, has watched enough to know the public version of this debate and the private one are not the same thing. And when it comes to the Protect College Sports Act, he doesn’t sound convinced that everyone cheering for it in public actually wants it to become law.
“I can assure you, there’s a lot of those people out there that are saying, ‘We want this [Protect College Sports Act] to pass,’ but behind the scenes are going, ‘This is not going to be good for us if this passes through,’” Dykes said. “That’s happening. I mean, c’mon guys ...”
Dykes is pointing to a messy truth at the center of the current college athletics fight: major schools and conferences have asked Washington for help, but now that help is on the table, not everybody seems eager to accept the terms.
As college football heads toward the 2026 season, the bill hangs over the sport with serious consequences for TCU and plenty of other Power Four programs. If the legislation advances, it could bring a federal framework for transfers, conference realignment and a hard $48.5 million cap on what an athletic department could pay its student-athletes.
The Senate was set to vote before its Aug. 10 recess, but the bill didn’t get there. It is tentatively expected to come up again in September.
Publicly, the Big Ten and SEC support the bill. Privately, there is growing suspicion that their backing is more about optics than enthusiasm, especially with the possibility of drawing President Donald Trump’s social media attention if they oppose it out loud. There is also the belief that both leagues would rather not see a federal system that might chip away at the advantages they have built, with the help of ESPN and Fox Sports.
For the schools outside that top tier, though, the bill is seen as a possible lifeline. The hope is that strict federal rules would finally create a real cost structure and give programs such as TCU a more realistic shot at competing for a national title again, something the Horned Frogs did in the 2022 season. Without that kind of system, the fear is that the richest schools will keep pulling away until the playoff, major championships and the sport’s biggest stage are dominated by the same handful of programs.
The Big Ten and SEC are positioned to be fine either way. Ohio State, Texas, Michigan, USC, Florida and Georgia are all mentioned in that group, along with Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, Clemson and Notre Dame. The schools that are worried are the rest - especially much of the Big 12 and ACC, which have watched the financial gap grow wider and wider.
That gap is one reason the bill has drawn so much attention. The Big Ten and SEC media rights deals are nearly double those of the ACC and Big 12, and that only fuels the concern that college sports could become something closer to “TheBIGSEC10 Invitational.”
Dykes’ skepticism also comes from what happened just a year ago. At that point, college leaders were celebrating a new system that included a $20.5 million allowance for schools to distribute to student-athletes.
But the House settlement with the NCAA also allows individual NIL deals, which means that figure functions more like a soft cap. The College Sports Commission created to police NIL rules has no real power, and schools with aggressive boosters have already pushed past the number.
That’s why Dykes isn’t eager to treat a hard cap as some magic fix.
“Revenue sharing was going to ‘fix everything.’ We had a great system, and some people chose not to play by the rules,” Dykes said.
“We had it all figured it out. We had NIL, and players that had a true following and presence could get a little bit more, just like the NFL players do.
It was the perfect model; some people chose not to play by the rules.
“If this does pass, we’ll ‘have a great system,' and some people will choose not to play by the rules.”
In Other News...
TCUs Ireland Opener Just Got More Interesting After UNCs QB Decision
TCUs trip to Ireland was already going to carry plenty of intrigue, and now the opener against North Carolina has a clearer quarterback picture on the other sideline. The Tar Heels have settled on Billy Edwards Jr. to lead the offense in the 2026 season opener, giving the Frogs a little more to study before the teams meet Aug. 29 in a noon ET game on ESPN.
Edwards arrived in Chapel Hill after transferring from Wisconsin following the 2025 season, and his selection gives UNC an early answer at one of the most watched positions in college football. For TCU, it adds another layer to a season-opening stage that was never going to feel ordinary, with an overseas setting, a national audience and an opponent now carrying at least one major piece of certainty into kickoff. [Read more 🡒]
Sonny Dykes Is Betting TCUs Season On A Dramatic Reset
TCUs offseason has been defined by a clear desire to look different on offense, and that starts with Sonny Dykes turning over the playbook for a more pro-style approach with NFL influences. The Horned Frogs are preparing for their season opener against North Carolina in Dublin, and the changes are bigger than simple personnel tweaks. The staff has been sorting out a new identity, one built to fit the roster Dykes believes can handle a more structured attack after years of a different kind of pace and spacing.
At the center of the reset is the quarterback picture, which has changed along with the scheme. Jaden Craig, the Harvard transfer, is in line to take over after Josh Hoover moved on to Indiana, giving TCU a fresh face to guide the offense into the opener. With the new system still coming together and the first test arriving overseas, the Horned Frogs are asking a lot of a group that has to adapt quickly if this overhaul is going to work. [Read more 🡒]