The Cardinals have room to shop this winter, but they also have a line they shouldn’t cross.
St. Louis is coming off a 77-win season, one that wasn’t a collapse so much as a reset.
The club got a better look at its young core, watched Leo Bernal, Joshua Baez and Quinn Mathews reach the big leagues, and added more depth to the farm by moving veterans out. That’s progress, even if it didn’t show up in the standings the way the organization wanted.
Now comes the part where the Cardinals have to keep moving forward without getting reckless. They could use a veteran starter, some bullpen help and maybe a third baseman.
That much makes sense. What doesn’t make much sense is the idea of going big in the trade market for Angels right-hander Reid Detmers, even though Bleacher Report’s Kerry Miller floated him as a target.
“St. Louis Cardinals: A Trade for an Ace Pitcher,” Miller wrote.
“Prime Target: Los Angeles' Reid Detmers (two years of arbitration eligibility, estimated at $7.5M in 2027). Putting the cart before the horse here, but if the Cardinals manage to add a legitimate ace this winter, they're going to be the team that everyone falls in love with as the pick to go from sub-.500 in 2026 to a possible first-round bye in 2027.
Upgrading the third base situation is presumably also on their to-do list, but adding an Opening Day starter would be huge.”
Detmers does check one box. He’s a six-year veteran, and he just posted the best season of his career, going 3.36 ERA in 32 starts. That kind of arm would make sense in a vacuum.
But baseball trades don’t happen in a vacuum, and St. Louis isn’t in position to spend premium prospect capital on a pitcher with a shaky track record.
Detmers didn’t make a start in 2025, instead working exclusively out of the Angels’ bullpen in 61 appearances. Before that, in 2024, he put up a 6.70 ERA in 17 starts and finished as a -1.1 WAR player.
That’s the problem: the upside is real, but so is the risk. If the Cardinals are going to pay a steep price, the return has to be far more certain than that.
And right now, St. Louis still isn’t close enough to contend at that level.
The farm system has been rebuilt, but the club shouldn’t be turning around and emptying it again for a gamble on a starter who isn’t guaranteed to be the 2026 version of himself in 2027. The Cardinals already know what it looks like when that pipeline gets stripped down.
They lived through that before, and it helped leave them where they’ve been over the past three years.
Detmers might be appealing. He might even be the kind of pitcher that makes a roster better. But for the Cardinals, chasing him would be a dangerous mistake.
In Other News...
Cardinals May Be Nearing A Tough Decision On One Young Bat
As the Cardinals head into an offseason where roster fits matter as much as raw talent, the conversation around possible trade pieces has started to sharpen around a few young bats. Crooks has put together a strong run in the minors, but his major league track record is still limited, while Pages has carved out a niche more as a defensive backup than an everyday answer. Both are at least plausible names to monitor if St. Louis decides to shuffle around the edges of the roster.
The more intriguing case is Gorman, whose upside has always been obvious but whose offensive production has been too uneven to ignore. For a Cardinals team trying to balance patience with the need for clearer results, he looks like the player most likely to draw real trade interest. Whether the front office actually pulls the trigger may come down to how much it believes a change of scenery is needed, and how willing it is to part with a young bat who still carries plenty of upside. [Read more 🡒]
Jack Flaherty Reunion Could Give Cardinals Options They May Soon Need
Jack Flahertys path back to St. Louis would make for one of those offseason moves that fits neatly with what the Cardinals have been trying to balance: present-day rotation help without boxing themselves into a long-term commitment. The right-hander, who was recently traded by the club, has shown enough swing-and-miss ability in recent seasons to keep interest alive, even with the kind of uneven performance that makes any real commitment a little tricky.
A short-term reunion would give the Cardinals another arm to work with and more flexibility if they need to reshuffle the staff later on. It also would mirror the kind of low-risk pitching addition St. Louis has explored before, with Dustin May serving as a useful comparison for the sort of upside-and-uncertainty profile that can appeal to a club trying to stay competitive while keeping options open. [Read more 🡒]
Cardinals Fans Just Got New Fuel In The DeWitt Spending Debate
David Rubenstein just added a fresh wrinkle to a debate Cardinals fans know well. The Baltimore Orioles owner said recently that owning a baseball team is profitable, which runs directly against what Bill DeWitt Jr. has long argued about the economics of running the Cardinals. The timing matters, too, with collective bargaining talks approaching and owners again pushing for a salary cap.
For St. Louis, the comments land in the middle of a larger question about how teams choose to spend. Some smaller-market clubs have found ways to compete by leaning into player development and scouting, even without matching the biggest payrolls. But when an owner publicly describes the business as lucrative, it gives fans more reason to wonder how much of the spending debate is about necessity and how much is about priorities. [Read more 🡒]
