Baltimore Orioles owner David Rubenstein just said the quiet part out loud, and it lands in direct contrast to a familiar refrain from MLB ownership.
At a forum with other sports team owners, Rubenstein said, “A lot of my friends were buying teams, and I realized they're making money. They're making more money than I'm making in private equity.” That kind of line is not something baseball owners usually volunteer, especially with collective bargaining negotiations looming and the league again heading toward a fight over a salary cap.
The timing makes the remark even more pointed because it flies against St. Louis Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt Jr.’s old claim that baseball ownership “isn't very profitable”.
DeWitt’s comments resurfaced in 2020, when owners and players were already at odds over the financial path forward during the COVID-shortened season and the lead-up to the mini-lockout after the 2021 season. He said then, “The industry (MLB) isn’t very profitable to be quite honest, and I think they (the players) understand that.”
That line has long bothered fans, especially since DeWitt bought the Cardinals for $150 million in 1995 and the franchise is now estimated to be worth $2.25 billion.
What makes Rubenstein’s statement stand out is that MLB owners rarely talk this openly about the money. Most of the public messaging ahead of the next CBA has focused on the idea that small-market clubs need a salary cap to compete, not on whether owners are already doing plenty well for themselves.
And the on-field evidence this season cuts against the notion that success is only for the biggest spenders. The Milwaukee Brewers, Tampa Bay Rays, and Cleveland Guardians have shown again that high-level baseball is possible without matching the Dodgers’ more than $400 million payroll. Those clubs have done it by being sharp in player development, scouting, and player acquisition.
That doesn’t mean spending is irrelevant. It just means there’s more than one way to build a winner.
The players’ case, and what fans of clubs like the Brewers, Rays, Guardians, and Cardinals can plainly see, is that ownership should be investing not just in payroll but in every part of the baseball operation. Nobody is asking every team to spend $400 million on salaries.
But there is enough money in the sport to support more spending than most owners are willing to admit.
In Other News...
Reid Detmers Could Spark A Cardinals Trade Debate Fans Hate
After finishing the 2026 season with 77 wins, the Cardinals have made it clear the priority is still development, not a quick fix. That puts any chatter about adding a veteran starter like Reid Detmers in a tricky spot, because while he would bring immediate value to a rotation in need of help, the club is still trying to build around its young core and replenish the farm system at the same time.
Detmers 2026 season was strong enough to make him an appealing name in trade conversations, but the broader track record is part of the hesitation. He has shown inconsistency in earlier years, which makes him the kind of pitcher who can tempt a front office without fully justifying the kind of prospect haul it would take to land him. For a Cardinals team trying to balance patience with urgency, that is exactly the sort of debate fans do not love revisiting. [Read more 🡒]
Cardinals May Be Nearing A Tough Decision On One Young Bat
As the Cardinals head into an offseason where roster fits matter as much as raw talent, the conversation around possible trade pieces has started to sharpen around a few young bats. Crooks has put together a strong run in the minors, but his major league track record is still limited, while Pages has carved out a niche more as a defensive backup than an everyday answer. Both are at least plausible names to monitor if St. Louis decides to shuffle around the edges of the roster.
The more intriguing case is Gorman, whose upside has always been obvious but whose offensive production has been too uneven to ignore. For a Cardinals team trying to balance patience with the need for clearer results, he looks like the player most likely to draw real trade interest. Whether the front office actually pulls the trigger may come down to how much it believes a change of scenery is needed, and how willing it is to part with a young bat who still carries plenty of upside. [Read more 🡒]
Jack Flaherty Reunion Could Give Cardinals Options They May Soon Need
Jack Flahertys path back to St. Louis would make for one of those offseason moves that fits neatly with what the Cardinals have been trying to balance: present-day rotation help without boxing themselves into a long-term commitment. The right-hander, who was recently traded by the club, has shown enough swing-and-miss ability in recent seasons to keep interest alive, even with the kind of uneven performance that makes any real commitment a little tricky.
A short-term reunion would give the Cardinals another arm to work with and more flexibility if they need to reshuffle the staff later on. It also would mirror the kind of low-risk pitching addition St. Louis has explored before, with Dustin May serving as a useful comparison for the sort of upside-and-uncertainty profile that can appeal to a club trying to stay competitive while keeping options open. [Read more 🡒]