The Big Ten has put a number on the table, and it’s a big one: $49 million in NIL spending for every member school, effective immediately.
The conference announced the policy on Wednesday, framing it as a move that lines up with the economic structure of the Protect College Sports Act, a bill that is still waiting on a vote in the House of Representatives. In practice, the Big Ten’s new cap breaks into two parts - $21.6 million tied to the revenue-sharing limit set by the House settlement, plus a $27.5 million ceiling on third-party NIL spending, including collectives.
“While we await the passage of the Protect College Sports Act, which has our full support, it is imperative our member institutions can begin to plan, budget and build their rosters approximating the act's economic structure,” the Big Ten council of chancellors said in a statement. “Our institutions remain in full support of the Protect College Sports Act and this rule not only allows for a much smoother transition into the policies put in place by the act once it passes, but demonstrates our commitment to it.”
The timing matters. The Big Ten is giving its schools a framework now for financial planning in 2027 and beyond, even though the law it is modeling itself after still has a shaky path ahead. Under the Protect College Sports Act, schools would be able to spend about $50 million on athlete payments, but there are added provisions: the House settlement amount would stay in place, athletic departments could use a retention fund worth up to $22.5 million to keep players from leaving, and another $5 million would be earmarked for women’s and Olympic sports.
That $49 million figure also lands in a reality where some schools are already moving aggressively. According to CBS Sports, Oregon and Ohio State are spending more than $40 million on football alone this year, while Michigan and USC are close to that mark as well.
The bill itself remains very much in limbo. The House is on recess through the midterm elections, which are on Tuesday, and then is set to return on Nov.
- A vote could happen after that, but the bigger question is whether the legislation can survive a lame-duck session.
The real cutoff is Jan. 3, when a new Congress is sworn in. If the bill has not become law by then, it dies and has to start over.
“I’m not sure what the fight is going to be like in lame duck as they try to push this over the edge, especially if the House switches from Republican to Democrat,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), an opponent of the bill, told CBS Sports. “Democrats should have a chance to really author a bill that corrects for a lot of the failings in this bill.”
There are also possible changes from within Congress that could slow everything down even further. Some Republicans want a ban on classifying athletes as employees, while others are pushing for a hard cap on international athletes in college sports. If the bill gets altered at this stage, it would need to go back to the Senate for another vote, which would only make its chances slimmer.
In Other News...
South Carolina Suddenly Has A Huge Backfield Problem After Oklahoma
South Carolinas backfield took a major hit against Oklahoma when Matt Fuller went down in the first quarter with an ankle injury, a sequence that ended with a broken bone in his foot and a likely season-ending surgery. Fuller had been one of the Gamecocks most productive runners, piling up 513 rushing yards and five touchdowns before the injury, and his absence immediately changed the feel of the offense.
Jabree Coleman, Christian Clark and Isaiah Augustave were the backs asked to absorb the workload after Fuller exited, and the staff now has to sort out how to replace both production and reliability moving forward. For a team trying to keep its ground game steady, losing a back who had become such a central piece of the rotation creates a problem that is hard to patch quickly. [Read more 🡒]
Shane Beamer Was Still Angry During South Carolinas Rout Of Oklahoma
South Carolina had already put together one of its sharpest offensive halves of the season against Oklahoma, piling up 322 yards and taking a 28-10 lead into the break, but Shane Beamer still found plenty to correct. Even with the Gamecocks controlling the game midway through the third quarter, the head coach was dissatisfied at halftime, pointing to the 10 points his team had handed away through mistakes while still acknowledging how well the offense handled Oklahomas defense.
Beamers reaction fit the tone of a coach who wants more than a comfortable margin, especially in a game that had already tilted so heavily in South Carolinas favor. The scoring cushion was there, the production was there, and the matchup was unfolding the way the Gamecocks wanted, but the frustration served as a reminder that Beamer was looking at the bigger picture rather than just the scoreboard. [Read more 🡒]
South Carolinas Late-Season Surge Just Got Hard To Ignore
South Carolinas late-season push picked up another jolt in Norman, where the Gamecocks handled Oklahoma 42-25 behind a big day from LaNorris Sellers. The quarterback threw for 301 yards and three touchdowns while adding two more scores on the ground, giving South Carolina the kind of balanced punch that can travel well this time of year even after a pair of interceptions and the early loss of top running back Matt Fuller.
What made the result stand out was how the Gamecocks absorbed the mistakes and still kept control. Oklahoma won the turnover battle, but South Carolinas defense made the Sooners work for everything and the offense kept finding answers, leaving the home team unable to climb back into the game. For a program trying to build momentum down the stretch, this was the sort of road win that gets noticed. [Read more 🡒]