The Sharks have a chance to circle back on Simon Edvinsson, but they do not need to rush into anything.
Detroit’s mess with unhappy players has become impossible to ignore, and Edvinsson is right there in the middle of it. The 23-year-old defenseman is stuck in limbo with the Red Wings, and San Jose is among the teams watching closely because he checks a lot of boxes for Mike Grier: big, mobile and built like the kind of blue-liner the Sharks want.
Edvinsson stands 6-foot-6 and weighs 225 pounds, and his size-skating combination is exactly what makes him so appealing. The Sharks need help on defense, and on paper he looks like the kind of player who could step in and matter right away.
But the situation in Detroit is messy enough that patience may be the better play.
Edvinsson, an unrestricted free agent, has until Dec. 1 to sign a contract or he will be ineligible to play an NHL game for the rest of 2026-27. Sportsnet’s Elliott Friedman reported that he wants to be traded, while Detroit says it wants to keep him.
Darren Dreger said on TSN’s Insider Trading with Pierre LeBrun, Gino Reda and Chris Johnston that “The Red Wings have offered contracts to date of one year, two years, five years and seven years, but clearly the money isn’t there. The San Jose Sharks are most definitely interested in Simon Edvinsson, and there are upwards of 10 teams interested in this 23-year-old defenseman.”
Edvinsson came to training camp without a deal, and once preseason started without progress, the frustration grew. He returned to Sweden and has been away from the team since. He will not come back until he signs.
Friedman also reported in his 32 Thoughts column that “The talks with the Sharks are substantive, I believe, with at least one serious offer between them - an offer that was not accepted by Detroit, as the story goes.”
He added that San Jose, the Boston Bruins, Nashville Predators and Seattle Kraken were all asked about young centers as part of a possible return for Edvinsson.
If Detroit is looking at the Sharks’ system, the names that make sense are Will Smith, Michael Misa, Zack Ostapchuk and Filip Bystedt. Sheng Peng reported that his sources say San Jose has also dangled Bystedt, Igor Chernyshov and 2026 ninth-overall draft pick Keaton Verhoeff in talks for Edvinsson.
That is where the debate gets real for San Jose. Edvinsson would fill a need immediately and project as a bona fide top-four defenseman. His size, skating and defensive positioning would give the Sharks a much-needed boost on a blue line that can too often turn one chance against into a wave of danger.
Still, if Detroit is trying to squeeze maximum value out of a player it may lose anyway, the Sharks should be careful not to overpay.
The longer this drags on, the more pressure shifts toward the Red Wings. If Detroit is bluffing, San Jose can wait. If the cost drops closer to the Dec. 1 deadline and the asking price becomes more reasonable, then the Sharks can get serious.
What they should not do is gut the part of the organization they are trying to build up. Moving one of Smith, Misa or Chernyshov would take a major bite out of the forward depth San Jose wants to become a strength. After using the draft to add Ryan Lin and Verhoeff on the back end, it would not make much sense to empty out a top-six forward of the future just to solve one problem by creating another.
If the price eventually shifts toward picks and prospects, then the Sharks should absolutely stay in the conversation. Forwards in the minors like Bystedt or Quentin Musty, along with draft capital, would be the kind of package worth considering. If Detroit keeps demanding too much, San Jose can afford to wait.
In Other News...
Ducks Can Test Whether Ottawas Hot Offense Hides A Bigger Problem
Ottawas Western Conference road trip opens with a useful measuring stick, because the Senators arrive with questions that go beyond their scoring touch. Defensive injuries and uneven play have made the group hard to read, even as Tim Sttzle and Drake Batherson have kept the offense moving and given the club enough firepower to stay dangerous on any given night.
For the Sharks, that makes the matchup worth watching from the start. San Jose has seen how quickly a hot offense can change the feel of a game, but this trip also puts Ottawa in a stretch where lineup depth matters, especially with Linus Ullmark, Warren Foegele, Andre Burakovsky and William Eklund all dealing with injury issues that affect how the Senators can piece things together. [Read more 🡒]
Warsofsky Is Already Challenging Sharks To Prove Who They Are
The Sharks have spent their first month of the season trying to sort out what they are, and the early returns have been uneven at best. At 7-7-1, San Jose has hovered around the break-even line while coach Ryan Warsofsky has pushed for more consistency and a clearer sense of buy-in after an offseason that brought roster changes and raised expectations for a cleaner, more connected team.
Instead, the issues have shown up in the areas that usually decide games in the NHL. San Jose has struggled defensively and has allowed the most high-danger chances in the league, a hard number to ignore for a team trying to establish an identity. The Sharks are also managing injuries to Alexander Wennberg and Igor Chernyshov, which only adds to the challenge as Warsofsky keeps pressing for a group that can show who it really is night after night. [Read more 🡒]
Sharks Keep Wasting Bright Spots With The Same Costly Breakdowns
The Sharks had one of those nights at SAP Center where the encouraging moments were easy to spot, but they never added up to much. Michael Misa provided the lone goal, and for stretches there were signs of pace and some pressure, but the game kept turning on the same familiar issues: missed assignments, loose coverage and breakdowns that left San Jose chasing the puck and the scoreboard.
Ottawa steadily took control as the game wore on, turning those lapses into a comfortable cushion and leaving the Sharks with little margin to recover. For a team still trying to build on its bright spots, the frustration is how often the same mistakes keep wiping them out before they can matter. [Read more 🡒]