The Padres’ deadline posture is starting to sharpen, and the timing makes sense. After a 5-4 win over the Giants pushed San Diego to 58-54, the club has now won eight of its last nine and climbed within a game of the final NL wild card spot.
That kind of run can change the conversation fast, and it may be nudging A.J. Preller toward a more obvious buying position.
But with Preller, nothing ever feels fully straightforward.
Joel Sherman of the New York Post reports that the Padres have at least poked around on two names that don’t fit the usual deadline script: the Mets’ Kodai Senga and the Giants’ Rafael Devers. On Senga, Sherman said San Diego has “checked in on” the right-hander, adding that the club was “more in the investigating and inquiring mode” than “heavily focused” on a deal. On Devers, Sherman said multiple sources told him that “Preller has at least considered” trying to acquire him, though it’s unclear whether that means internal discussion or actual contact with the Giants.
Even if those talks never get anywhere, they fit the way Preller tends to operate. He has never been shy about kicking around unconventional ideas, and plenty of his more creative swings over his 12 years running the Padres have actually turned into real moves. At this stage, looking into names like Senga and Devers sounds a lot like due diligence - the kind of broad shopping that happens before a front office narrows its focus.
It also points toward the kind of problem Preller might be trying to solve. Senga is owed the rest of a $14MM salary for 2026 and another $14MM in 2027.
Devers is on a much bigger number, with about $220MM still due through the end of the 2033 season, though $52.5MM of that money is deferred. That kind of money usually means any serious discussion would have to involve contracts that another club wants to move off.
Of the two, Senga looks far more realistic. The Mets are in seller mode, and they’re probably open to dealing him in the fourth year of his five-year, $75MM contract.
His career arc has taken a hard turn since that strong 2023 rookie season. Injuries wiped out almost all of 2024, and he has been limited to 113 1/3 innings in 2025 and just 44 2/3 this year.
Even before this season, he was still posting useful results when healthy, but this year has been rough: an 8.66 ERA, a demotion from the rotation, and then a return to start Friday’s game.
There are also a couple of reasons San Diego would make sense as a landing spot. Sherman noted the Padres were among the other teams that bid on Senga when he came over from Japan, and Senga has a long friendship with Yu Darvish.
From the Padres’ side, the appeal is obvious enough: rotation help. Nick Pivetta and Joe Musgrove are set to begin minor league rehab assignments on Tuesday, but San Diego could still use as many arms as it can find to get through innings.
Devers is a different animal entirely, and the path to a deal looks much narrower. Reports in June said the Giants were open to clearing long-term payroll space by moving one or more of Devers, Matt Chapman, or Willy Adames.
So far, none of those ideas has gained much traction, largely because the contracts are so heavy. Devers is the most expensive of the group, and while his 119 wRC+ - built on a .250/.324/.481 line with 23 homers - is down from his usual level, he has hit like himself again after a brutal April.
In theory, a massive contract swap involving Devers and one of Xander Bogaerts or Fernando Tatis Jr. could be imagined. In practice, both Bogaerts and Tatis have no-trade clauses, and the idea of two division rivals lining up on a deal that large with the deadline this close is hard to buy. Devers feels like a true long shot, though it’s not impossible the topic comes back up between the two clubs later on.
In Other News...
Giants Trade Is Already Stirring A Luis Arraez Debate
Luis Arraezs move out of San Francisco and to Philadelphia before the MLB trade deadline was always going to draw attention, but it did not take long for the debate around the deal to heat up. The contact hitter wasted no time making an impression in his Phillies debut, and his arrival immediately added a different look to a lineup that expects him to be a central offensive piece.
Philly already adjusted around him to make the fit work, a sign of how quickly the club is embracing the move. For the Giants, the real question now is less about what Arraez did in one game and more about what his early success with a contender might say about how this trade will be judged if he keeps producing in a new uniform. [Read more 🡒]
Giants Now Face A Brutal Matt Chapman Decision
Matt Chapman has been out of the Giants lineup since July 1 with a core muscle injury that was confirmed by an MRI, and the club has already been forced to keep reshuffling around him. Casey Schmitts knee injury and the trade of Luis Arraez have added to the turnover, leaving San Francisco without the stability it expected at third base and in the middle of the order.
Chapman is now set for a full evaluation with Dr. William Meyers, and what comes next will shape the Giants infield plans for the stretch run. The team still does not know whether he can make it back this season, and the uncertainty leaves San Francisco waiting on a decision that could define how it handles the rest of the year. [Read more 🡒]
Buster Posey Just Made The Giants New Direction Impossible To Miss
The Giants deadline picture made their direction hard to ignore, even if the franchise stopped short of a teardown. By sending away veterans like Luis Arraez, Robbie Ray and Tyler Mahle, San Francisco turned the day into a clear bet on younger, controllable pitching, with Ramon Marquez standing out as part of that return. At the same time, the front office made sure the foundation stayed intact, keeping Logan Webb, Rafael Devers, Willy Adames, Jung Hoo Lee and Bryce Eldridge in place.
That mix leaves the Giants in an in-between spot that still feels pretty decisive. This was not a team acting like a club that plans to start over from scratch, but one trying to stock the pipeline, deepen the pitching, and grow around a core that can still matter now and later. The deadline choices point to a future built on development and flexibility, with the roster reshaping around talent the organization can control. [Read more 🡒]