The SF Giants may need to take a hard look at the deals they handed out this offseason, and Harrison Bader stands out as one contract they could realistically move before the deadline.
Bader was brought in on a two-year, $20.5 million agreement to help stabilize center field defense, and that part of the bet made sense. Since debuting with the St.
Louis Cardinals in 2017, he has been one of the better defenders at his position. But the rest of the package has not gone the Giants’ way.
His season has been interrupted by injuries, first a hamstring strain and then plantar fasciitis that has kept him on the injured list since the end of May. And when he was on the field, the production was light. In 111 plate appearances, he posted a .557 OPS.
Still, Bader’s broader track record gives him a chance to appeal to another club. The 10-year veteran has usually fit as a dependable fourth outfielder, with a bat that has bounced around but has generally carried some modest pop.
That’s part of why the Giants could try a different tactic: pay down some of the money left on the deal and make the contract easier to move. Bader is owed a little less than $5 million for the rest of this year, plus $10.25 million in 2027. If San Francisco chips in $5 million, it could turn the rest of the contract into a more manageable number for another team.
The Giants are expected to explore moving Tyler Mahle and Luis Arráez before the trade deadline, but they should also consider one of the multi-year signings from the offseason. That group includes Bader and Adrian Houser.
Houser has not been an easy sell either. He struggled in the rotation, and his work out of the bullpen has not gone much better. Pitching is always in demand, but the Giants need it too, even if only to get through the rest of the season.
Bader may make more sense as the movable piece. A quality fourth outfielder can still help a lot of lineups, and while he has not delivered that value this year, that has been his lane in the past. If the Giants are willing to absorb some salary, there is at least a path to a deal.
In Other News...
Phillies Zeroing In On Two Giants Bats Before The Deadline
With the trade deadline approaching, the Giants are drawing attention from clubs looking for help on both sides of the ball, and a recent game in San Francisco gave evaluators a closer look at two players who fit different needs. Heliot Ramos has flashed enough offense to make him an intriguing bat, while Casey Schmitt keeps showing why teams value a utility infielder who can move around the diamond and still bring some pop.
The interest matters because these are the kinds of players contenders often circle when they start sorting out what they can add without overpaying for a bigger name. Ramos brings upside, but his profile comes with some defensive questions, while Schmitts appeal is rooted in versatility and power, the sort of combination that can quietly swing a deadline conversation if a team decides the fit is right. [Read more 🡒]
Buster Posey Just Sparked A Giants Debate Fans Never Expected
Buster Posey is back in the Hall of Fame conversation, this time as a first-time ballot candidate with the kind of playing rsum that usually travels well in Cooperstown. Seven All-Star nods, five Silver Sluggers, three World Series rings and an NL MVP from 2012 make the case on the field pretty straightforward, which is why the bigger debate around Posey in San Francisco has shifted to what comes next and how his current role colors the way fans view him now.
As president of baseball operations, Posey has had a more uneven run, with the Giants sitting at 42-57 and several offseason moves not quite landing the way the club hoped. One of those moves was bringing in Justin Verlander on a one-year, $15 million deal, and after a 3.85 ERA in 29 starts, the veteran right-hander announced he will retire at seasons end, leaving Poseys front-office evaluation very much open as the organization tries to sort out where it stands. [Read more 🡒]
Giants Broadcaster Just Put Tony Vitellos Biggest Problem In Focus
Tony Vitellos first season managing the Giants has already come with the kind of transition pains that tend to follow a jump from the college game to the majors. The learning curve is not just about lineup cards and bullpen calls. It is also about authority, and broadcaster Dave Flemming recently zeroed in on the part of Vitellos adjustment that may matter most: whether he is being too deferential to veteran players when the job calls for a firmer hand.
For a club trying to establish its own standards, that question lingers around every clubhouse miscue and every moment when a manager chooses not to make a public example of it. Vitello has shown a willingness to avoid open conflict, which can be understandable for a first-year skipper trying to earn trust, but it also leaves a bigger issue hanging over the Giants. The organization is not treating this as a one-and-done experiment, so the real pressure now is on Vitello to show he can balance respect with command before the seasons growing pains harden into a pattern. [Read more 🡒]