Giants Face One Costly Catch In Their Closer Search

The SF Giants are eyeing several mid-tier closers this offseason to bolster their bullpen, prioritizing strategic signings over high-profile acquisitions.

The SF Giants have made their need plain: they need someone who can finish games. President of baseball operations Buster Posey has already said the club will make finding a closer a priority this offseason, and after the way the team handled ninth-inning leads in 2026, that mission is hard to ignore.

But the wish list and the shopping list are two very different things. Names like David Bednar and Adrian Morejon are the kind of arms that get fans dreaming, but both would come at a steep price.

On top of that, each received a qualifying offer, which means signing either one would cost the Giants draft compensation and international bonus pool money. For a team coming off such a bad season, that makes the path to either pitcher even narrower.

So if San Francisco is going to fill the role, the more likely answer may come from a different tier of the market. Here are five closer options that look more realistic for the Giants.

Raisel Iglesias sits near the top of that group. The 36-year-old was an All-Star for the Atlanta Braves in 2026 and has stacked up 29 or more saves in every season since 2023.

Over that stretch, he has posted a combined regular season ERA of 2.60. MLB Trade Rumors projects him for a one-year, $17 million deal, and one of their writers even has him landing with the Giants.

It might take closer to $20 million to pull him away from Atlanta, but he is still one of the more believable targets on the board.

Kenley Jansen brings the kind of résumé that almost sells itself. If he pitches again next year, he could reach his 500th career save; he currently sits at 498.

The Detroit Tigers declined his option, pushing him into free agency, and he turned in a respectable 2026 with a 3.20 ERA in 45 innings while converting 22 of 28 save chances. A one-year deal in the $10-12 million range could be enough to land him, and it would feel a lot like the Giants signing Justin Verlander in 2025 - only this time, it would be for the back end of the bullpen.

Emilio Pagan is another name that fits the middle of the market. Over the last two seasons, he has been steady in the ninth inning, saving 32 games with a 2.88 ERA in 2025 and following that with a 3.38 ERA and 25 saves in 2026. He turned down his $10 million player option with the Cincinnati Reds, so a Giants offer in the $12 or $13 million range could put him in play.

Pete Fairbanks is a tougher evaluation because of how uneven 2026 was. He posted a 6.31 ERA with the Miami Marlins after being excellent as Tampa Bay’s closer from 2023 to 2025, when he racked up 75 saves and a 2.98 ERA. He likely wouldn’t cost a fortune, with an $8-10 million range seeming possible, but that rough season would hang over any pursuit.

Carlos Estevez may be the most intriguing gamble of the bunch. He was an All-Star for the Kansas City Royals in 2025, when he finished with 42 saves and a 2.45 ERA.

Then 2026 went sideways fast: he made one appearance, recorded just one out, gave up six earned runs, landed on the IL with a foot issue, and later suffered a rotator cuff injury during rehab that ended his season. He is now a free agent, and while the Giants probably should not count on him as their Opening Day closer, a two-year deal could make sense if they are betting on a return to his 2025 level in 2028.

None of these names is as flashy as the top of the market, but that may be the point. If the Giants are serious about adding a closer without blowing past reason, this is the lane they are most likely to work in.

In Other News...

Giants Free Agency Could Frustrate Fans Hoping For A Bigger Splash

The Giants offseason may end up looking a lot more practical than flashy. Rather than chasing the top of the free-agent market, San Francisco is expected to lean toward mid-tier additions and internal options, a path that fits the clubs need to manage resources carefully while still trying to improve the roster.

A big reason is the cost attached to players who received qualifying offers. Names such as David Bednar, Brandon Lowe, Adrian Morejon, Randy Arozarena, Trevor Rogers and Seiya Suzuki are all in that category, and signing one would mean giving up draft compensation along with international bonus pool money. For a Giants team that appears intent on staying selective, those extra costs could be enough to steer the front office toward cheaper alternatives instead. [Read more 🡒]

Giants Just Exposed A Bullpen Weakness They Still Havent Solved

The Giants spent part of their roster cleanup trimming three left-handed arms from the 40-man mix, with Matt Gage and Seth Lonsway outrighted to Sacramento and Reiver Sanmartn designated for assignment. On paper, it was a routine set of moves. In practice, it underscored how thin the clubs supply of left-handed relief help has become as it looks ahead to next season.

Sam Hentges remains the most obvious answer in that lane, but the Giants are still carrying concerns about recent performance, and the rest of the left-handed depth chart is hardly reassuring. Some of the other options are young, while others are working back from surgery, which leaves the bullpen with a familiar problem: not enough dependable left-handed innings and no clear sign yet that the issue has been solved. [Read more 🡒]

Giants Pitching Woes Could Force Them Into A Market Fans Never Expected

The Giants spent the 2026 season searching for stability on the mound and never really found it, finishing 65-97 while ranking 23rd in team ERA. Their first move toward addressing the problem was modest, bringing in Tony Neubeck from the Nationals, but it hardly changes the larger picture for a staff that needs far more than a depth add to get back on track.

That is why Bob Nightengales mention of San Francisco as a possible suitor for Tarik Skubal stands out. A pitcher of that caliber would push the Giants into a market they have not often occupied, especially with Skubal expected to command a contract big enough to limit the field to only the most financially aggressive teams. For a club trying to climb out of a rough season, the question is not just whether it needs an ace, but whether it is willing to chase one at that level. [Read more 🡒]