Padres Avoid Chris Bassitt After Revealing What Orioles Really Paid

Faced with tight payroll and tough choices, the Padres decision to pass on Chris Bassitt may prove wiser than it first appeared.

When the Padres locked in Michael King with a three-year, $75 million deal, it signaled a clear direction for their 2026 rotation - invest heavily at the top, and get creative with the rest. That kind of commitment to King, paired with existing deals for Joe Musgrove ($20 million) and Nick Pivetta ($19 million), meant San Diego was essentially rolling with a “big three” and hoping to fill out the rest of the rotation without breaking the bank.

That’s a tightrope walk in today’s pitching market, where even back-end arms can command hefty salaries. And it’s why the Padres ultimately passed on veteran right-hander Chris Bassitt, despite initial speculation that he could be a fit.

Bassitt, coming off a solid 2025 campaign, landed a one-year, $18.5 million deal with the Orioles. At 36, he still showed he could handle a full workload - 170.1 innings with a 3.96 ERA - and that kind of durability doesn’t grow on trees. But for a Padres team operating with limited financial flexibility and looking to retool rather than go all-in, that price tag was simply too steep.

It’s not that Bassitt wouldn’t have helped. He’s a proven innings-eater with a deep pitch mix and a track record of keeping his team in games. But the Padres are in a spot where every dollar counts, and allocating nearly $20 million to a fourth or fifth starter just didn’t align with the front office’s current strategy.

So instead, San Diego looks inward - and toward value signings - to round out the rotation. As things stand, the five-man unit projects to be Pivetta, King, Musgrove, Randy Vásquez, and JP Sears. Vásquez and Sears both showed flashes last season and offer cost-controlled upside, but relying on them to carry a full starter’s workload over 162 games is a gamble.

That’s why the Padres aren’t done. Expect them to keep looking for one more arm - ideally someone who can bring stability without the premium price tag.

There are still names on the market, and one that stands out is Zac Gallen. A short-term deal could make sense for both sides, especially if Gallen is looking to reset his value after a dip in performance or health questions.

The Padres’ approach this offseason has been about threading the needle - staying competitive without overextending financially. Committing to King was the big swing. Now it’s about finding the right complementary pieces to make the rest of the puzzle fit.