Rutgers still hasn’t settled its quarterback race, and Greg Schiano says the answer is coming soon.
With the 2026 season less than two weeks away, the Scarlet Knights wrapped up their second and final scrimmage of training camp on Saturday without naming a starter. Schiano addressed the media afterward and made it clear the decision is close, even if there’s no exact date pinned down yet.
“I don’t know exactly what day,” Schiano said. “I got enough deadlines, I don’t want to put any on myself, but it’ll be soon.
Kirk and I will sit down after we watch [tape], but it’s more a conversation than one tape. Today wasn’t that much tape.
It’s just looking at the total body of work, what we think is right. Like I said last week, we have two good choices and I’m very confident in both of them, so just gotta make them.”
The competition has centered on AJ Surace and Boston College transfer Dylan Lonergan, who are vying to replace Kaliakmanis. Surace is heading into his third year in the program, while Lonergan is at his third school. He started at Alabama, spent two years there, then appeared in 10 games for Boston College in 2025.
Lonergan finished that season with 2,025 passing yards, 12 touchdowns and five interceptions.
Schiano said the two quarterbacks have made the call difficult because they bring similar strengths to the position.
“The quarterback deal, I think they’re similar quarterbacks and that’s what’s made it challenging to make a decision,” Schiano said. “They both bring great skill sets to the position.
Great mentality, maturity, leadership. They really are two really good college quarterbacks, so we just got make a decision.”
He also said Rutgers will announce a starting quarterback, but other spots won’t be revealed until the full lineup is public.
Offensive coordinator Kirk Ciarrocca has played a major role in the conversation, and Schiano said he and his coordinator are aligned on the process. Schiano stressed that he alone will make the final call, but he doesn’t see any friction there.
“It’s not like we’re starting a conversation,” Schiano said. “Things go with ebbs and flows, but we’ll just confirm what we both believe.
He spends a lot more time with them than I do and he’s the expert on that. Ultimately, I have to make the decision, but he and I are on the same page.
I don’t think it’s going to be an issue.”
In Other News...
Rutgers Extends A Scheduling Pattern Fans Know All Too Well
Rutgers has added another familiar non-conference date to its future schedule, locking in a home game against Akron for Sept. 13, 2031. The matchup fits a pattern Scarlet Knights fans have seen become routine, with Rutgers continuing to line up at least one Mid-American Conference opponent each year since 2024.
Akron will travel to Piscataway for a guaranteed payout of $1.5 million, another example of how these home dates have been built. For Rutgers, it is one more piece of a schedule that has leaned on the MAC for steady out-of-league fill-ins, even if the broader shape of that 2031 slate is still taking form. [Read more 🡒]
Rutgers Keeps Following A Familiar Scheduling Trend Into The Future
Rutgers has added Akron to its future nonconference slate, landing a Sept. 13, 2031, matchup that fits a pattern the program has leaned into for years. The game, first reported by fbschedules.com and confirmed by NJ.com, gives the Scarlet Knights another familiar out-of-conference opponent as they continue building out a schedule that has steadily featured Mid-American Conference teams.
The addition is hardly surprising for a program that has made a habit of lining up MAC competition well into the future. Rutgers already has several more games scheduled against MAC schools through 2031, and Akron now joins that run of matchups as the Scarlet Knights keep shaping their calendar with an eye toward consistency and a manageable path outside league play. [Read more 🡒]
Rutgers Just Got A Reality Check That Could Shape What Comes Next
Rutgers got a sharp reminder in a nonconference test against No. 5 Georgetown, dropping a 2-1 match in a game that showed how thin the margin can be against a top-ranked opponent. Georgetown controlled much of the play, generated more shots and held the lead for most of the afternoon, while Rutgers kept looking for ways to adjust as the game unfolded. Even in defeat, the Scarlet Knights had enough from their goalkeeper to keep the score from getting away.
The late pressure finally produced a breakthrough for Rutgers, which pushed until the closing moments and made the matchup look closer than it had been for long stretches. The result leaves Rutgers with something more useful than a moral victory: a clear view of where the team stood against elite competition and the kind of response it will need if it wants the rest of its schedule to look different. [Read more 🡒]