Rutgers Faces A Rivalry Debate Fans Still Havent Settled

As the college football season kicks off, Rutgers fans are left searching for a game that truly excites their passions amidst a lack of enduring rivalries.

College football is back this week, and with it comes the usual calendar full of games fans circle in advance.

There’s the September 12 rematch between Ohio State and Texas, an early-season heavyweight showdown. A week later, LSU heads to Ole Miss on September 19, which brings Lane Kiffin back to Oxford and, as the source notes, would be a fun one to see the secondary-market ticket numbers for.

October 10 delivers Georgia at Alabama, another SEC battle that carries plenty of weight. On November 7, Miami visits Notre Dame in a matchup that still echoes the old “Catholics vs. convicts” label, even if that was a long time ago, and this one has ranking and CFP implications.

Then come the late-November staples: Texas at Texas A&M on November 27, a game you don’t miss in Texas or anywhere else, and Michigan at Ohio State on November 28, The Game, with apologies to Cal-Stanford and Harvard-Yale.

That kind of built-in animosity is exactly what Rutgers doesn’t really have.

There isn’t a true “rivalry game” on the Rutgers schedule in the traditional sense, at least not one that jumps out the way those other matchups do. A search turns up plenty of rivalry games around the Big Ten, against both conference and non-conference opponents, but not Rutgers. That’s just the reality.

So what does come closest for Rutgers? Which game means the most?

Looking ahead to the 2026 schedule, the first four games are easy to cross off if you’re trying to find that one. The three non-conference games don’t carry much special weight.

UMass and Howard are just there. Boston College doesn’t move the needle much either, aside from the old jokes about the Big East and the idea of living off one miraculous pass for 42 years.

USC is the one early exception: there’s hardly any history there for Rutgers, but it is a ranked team and the game is at home, so maybe that one has something to it.

Maryland is the obvious place people have tried to force some kind of rivalry. It’s the closest Big Ten school to Piscataway.

The two schools joined the conference together. The league even paired them in the same division and later made them permanent opponents.

Still, that matchup doesn’t really set the pulse racing. Beating the Terps matters, though, and it matters even more this year.

Indiana is a different kind of conversation. It used to be a game Rutgers could realistically feel good about every time it came around.

The all-time series is even at 5-5. But now Mark Cuban opened the checkbook, Curt Cignetti arrived, and the fun has faded.

Michigan State has always had a little more appeal. There’s a familiarity there, a sense of two “State” schools not always getting the respect they deserve.

Rutgers has won enough of those meetings to make the Spartans feel like a legitimate rival, with the all-time record sitting at 6-10. Even so, that game still doesn’t create much of a buzz in advance.

Not even this year, when it’s the final game and a win could get Rutgers bowl eligible, does it feel especially special.

Northwestern, Nebraska and Michigan don’t really do it either. Michigan is the one most people nationally dislike, but even that doesn’t make the Rutgers matchup feel bigger. Northwestern and Nebraska could matter for postseason hopes, yet that’s not the same thing as anticipation.

Then there’s Penn State, which at least raises the question. Is that the closest Rutgers gets to a true hate week?

Do you get that worked up about playing the cult? The source notes that several cousins attended Penn State and are good, normal people, which makes the whole thing feel a little strange.

If this were a real grudge matchup, shouldn’t there be a school you simply don’t want to hear from, no matter what?

That’s the question hanging over Rutgers: which game, if any, really feels like the one you can’t wait for?

In Other News...

Rutgers Extends A Scheduling Pattern Fans Know All Too Well

Rutgers has already lined up another familiar non-conference date, adding Akron to the 2031 home schedule for Sept. 13. The matchup fits a pattern Scarlet Knights fans have seen before, with the program continuing to bring in at least one Mid-American Conference opponent every year since 2024.

Akron will come to Piscataway under a $1.5 million guarantee, another sign of how Rutgers has used these early scheduling windows to keep its home slate filled. It is the kind of booking that may not move the needle nationally, but it has become a steady part of how the Scarlet Knights have built out their future calendars. [Read more 🡒]

Rutgers Keeps Following A Familiar Scheduling Trend Into The Future

Rutgers has added another familiar nonconference date to its future calendar, lining up Akron for Sept. 13, 2031. The matchup, first reported by FBSchedules.com and confirmed by NJ.com, fits the way Rutgers has been building out its schedule in recent years, with the Scarlet Knights continuing to lean on Mid-American Conference opponents as part of their out-of-conference plan.

That pattern is already well established, and it reaches well beyond Akron. Rutgers has several future games lined up against MAC teams through 2031, a steady stream of opponents that gives the program a consistent scheduling lane as it looks ahead. For a team trying to manage long-term planning, it is another sign that Rutgers is sticking with a formula it knows well. [Read more 🡒]