Micah Potter’s spot with the Portland Trail Blazers already looks shaky, even though he just arrived.
NBA insider Jake Fischer reported that Portland is bringing in other players to compete with Potter for his roster place, a sign the Blazers are not treating his addition as a long-term lock. Potter was claimed off waivers earlier this month, only two days after the Indiana Pacers waived him to create room to sign Larry Nance Jr.
The contract situation gives Portland plenty of flexibility. Before free agency began, the Pacers picked up Potter’s $2.8 million option for the coming season, but it is a non-guaranteed deal with the full guarantee not expected until Jan.
10, 2027. That means Potter does not see that money unless he is still on the roster by the middle of January.
If he is not getting on the floor and is not part of the rotation, there is a real chance the Blazers move on before then, especially with the team’s recent emphasis on money following new owner Tom Dundon’s arrival.
Potter does have a path to stick. If he performs, he earns the salary.
If not, the Blazers will have no shortage of reasons to keep searching. He averaged a career-high 9.7 points and 5.0 rebounds per game last season for Indiana, appearing in 47 games.
His appeal is obvious on paper. Potter can play both power forward and center, which gives Portland some lineup flexibility. But his defensive issues could keep him off the court and make it harder for him to carve out a bigger role.
That does not mean Potter cannot last the full 2026-27 season in Portland. It just means he will need the best basketball of his career to make that happen.
For now, the Blazers appear set to use these non-guaranteed deals as both a low-cost roster tool and a push for competition. Players such as Trendon Watford, Blake Wesley and Bryce McGowens, all of whom were with Portland earlier in their careers, could fit that mold. Younger options like Andre Jackson Jr., who is still searching for a home before his 25th birthday, also make sense.
Portland’s approach is clear: keep the books clean, avoid paying players who won’t crack the rotation, and make every spot on the roster something that has to be earned.
In Other News...
Blazers Draft Pick Is Creating A Roster Problem Fans Know Too Well
Portlands decision to take Yang Hansen with the No. 16 pick in the 2025 NBA Draft brought a familiar kind of roster headache into focus, the sort that has followed the club before when the balance of the roster starts to tilt in one direction. The Blazers already have a lineup that leans heavily toward point guards and centers, which makes every move feel like it comes with a tradeoff somewhere else on the floor.
Hansen is being viewed as a multi-year project, and at least for now, the path in front of him points toward a backup center role. That leaves Portland trying to sort out both the present and the future at the same position, with no clean answer yet on how the rookie fits into the bigger picture or how long it will take before his development stops being a question and starts becoming a solution. [Read more 🡒]
Blazers Still Have One Roster Problem They Cannot Ignore
The Trail Blazers are already looking at the next roster fix after reshaping the backcourt around Ja Morant, and the issue is pretty clear: the talent is there, but the fit still needs work. Portland has been exploring ways to add more size and two-way balance on the wing and in the frontcourt, with the kind of trade chatter that usually follows a major move and forces a front office to keep recalibrating.
Among the names tied to that search are P.J. Washington, Trey Murphy III, Peyton Watson, Michael Porter Jr. and Max Strus, a mix that shows how broad Portlands options could be if it decides to chase help rather than wait for internal development. Some of those paths are more realistic than others, and the Blazers interest in certain targets has shifted as the market and their own roster picture have changed, leaving the team with a familiar question: which kind of upgrade actually solves the problem without creating a new one? [Read more 🡒]