Anfernee Simons Just Got A Legacy-Level Snub Blazers Fans Will Hate

Despite remarkable stats and undeniable skill, Anfernee Simons' exclusion from Bleacher Report's list spotlights a glaring oversight in recognizing today's elite shooters.

Bleacher Report’s new “99 Best Shooters of All Time” list left plenty of people with complaints, but from a Trail Blazers angle, the omission that jumps off the page is Anfernee Simons.

That’s not a casual gripe. Simons has spent the last few seasons building a real case as one of the best shooters in the league, and the numbers back it up.

His rise really took off in Portland during the 2021-22 season, and he hasn’t backed off since. In a league packed with guards who can really let it fly, Simons still stands near the top of the class.

Leaving him off the list is a bizarre miss.

The strongest argument for Simons starts with volume. He doesn’t just hit threes at a good clip; he hits a ton of them.

He ranks 17th all-time in three-pointers made per game at 2.5 and eighth all-time in three-pointers made per 100 possessions at 4.6. That kind of production matters because it shows he’s not just surviving as a shooter - he’s piling up makes at a level most players never touch.

And this isn’t empty volume, either. Simons has paired heavy shot-making with real efficiency year after year.

In 2021-22, his breakout season, he shot 40.5% from three on 7.8 attempts per game. He followed that with 37.7% on 9.1 attempts in 2022-23, 38.5% on 8.8 attempts in 2023-24, 36.3% on 8.5 attempts in 2024-25, and 38.5% on 6.9 attempts in 2025-26.

That last number jumps to 39.5% if you leave out his six games with the disorganized Bulls.

Those are outrageous marks when you stack them against the kind of workload he carries. Simons isn’t just cashing in on easy corner looks. He’s doing damage on the kinds of shots that separate good shooters from great ones.

His game makes that pretty obvious. Simons is a Damian Lillard disciple, and it shows in the way he hunts shots.

He’s deadly off the dribble, dangerous coming off screens, and comfortable in isolation. He scores like a perimeter star, not like a specialist who only thrives when someone else creates the opening.

That’s why the usual “he’s not just a spot-up guy” point matters here. Plenty of players can knock down open threes.

Simons can do that, too, but he can also make the tougher stuff - the pull-ups, the movement shots, the self-created looks. That broader shot-making package is what makes him more valuable than a lot of the names BR put ahead of him.

There are too many questionable choices on the list to go through one by one, but several of the players ranked above Simons deserve a hard look. Terry Porter, Dana Barros, Ricky Pierce, Bill Sharman, Dan Majerle, Word B. Free and Chuck Person are among the older names that were honored for helping shape the modern shooter’s path, but their placement over Simons doesn’t hold up against what he’s doing now.

And this isn’t only about the older generation. Joe Ingles and Bojan Bogdanovic would struggle if they were asked to handle the same on-ball burden Simons carries.

He’s earned the kind of nickname that only sticks for a reason. Anfernee Simons is “Anferno” for a reason, and maybe it sounds bold, but the truth is hard to ignore: he belongs in the conversation with the greatest shooters ever.

In Other News...

Matas Buzelis Just Picked An Unexpected Blueprint For His Next Leap

Matas Buzelis has already taken a noticeable step forward in his second NBA season, turning a promising rookie-year profile into something far more productive for the Bulls. The 2024 draft pick averaged 16.3 points, 5.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists and 1.5 blocks over 77 games, and now he is spending the offseason trying to make that growth look more sustainable by adding strength and changing how he gets his points.

On a recent podcast, Buzelis said he wants to be more physical, attack the rim more and stop settling for so many three-point attempts. He also mentioned plans to work out with Deni Avdija, a sign he is looking beyond simple skill work and toward a broader blueprint for how to bend his game toward the kind of downhill, contact-heavy style that can hold up when defenses start loading up on him. [Read more 🡒]

Blazers Fans Suddenly Have A Real Reason To Worry About Scoot

Scoot Hendersons second season never really got the runway he needed. A hamstring injury wiped out much of last year, and with that went a real chance to lock down the kind of lead-guard role Portland has been trying to define for him. Instead, the Trail Blazers spent the offseason reshaping the backcourt again, adding more names to a rotation that already had plenty of questions attached to it.

Now the pressure has shifted from development to fit, and that is where things get uncomfortable for Portland. Henderson is eligible for a contract extension this summer, and the Blazers have to decide whether his upside still points to a long-term core piece or whether the crowded guard picture makes that harder to see. For a player who was supposed to be central to the rebuild, the next step suddenly feels a lot less straightforward. [Read more 🡒]

Blazers Arena Fight Suddenly Feels Bigger Than Just Moda Center

The conversation around Moda Center has moved well beyond a standard building upgrade, with the Trail Blazers and the city of Portland now locked into talks over what kind of future the franchise wants in the building it has called home for decades. Portland has put $600 million in public funds on the table for renovations tied to a 20-year lease, but the size of that proposal has only sharpened the sense that the arena issue is really about the teams place in the citys long-term sports landscape.

Tom Dundon has already pointed to the Oklahoma City Thunders $900 million public funding package as the kind of benchmark that makes Portlands offer look light by comparison, and the pressure only grows as the current lease runs toward 2030. Former Blazer Channing Frye has also described Moda Center as a standalone arena with little around it, a reminder that the debate is not just about repairs or amenities. It is about whether the building still fits the economics and expectations of the modern NBA, or whether the Blazers are quietly keeping every option open. [Read more 🡒]