For years, Bob Nutting has leaned on baseball’s financial imbalance to explain why the Pirates can’t always spend like the sport’s biggest powers. The Yankees and Dodgers sit in a different universe, and that has long been the convenient backdrop for Pittsburgh’s spending limits.
The Major League Baseball Players Association may now be trying to change the script in a way that’s even less friendly to Nutting.
In its opening economic proposal, the union is pushing to expand revenue sharing and guarantee every small-market club at least $240 million in annual revenue. That is not a payroll mandate, but it would give teams like the Pirates a much sturdier financial base. The catch is that the MLBPA also wants to make sure owners don’t just bank the money and move on.
The proposal includes a new Competitive Integrity Tax aimed at clubs that don’t reach minimum payroll levels, plus extra penalties for teams that do not put revenue-sharing dollars back into player payroll. Reported details say clubs spending under $150 million would be hit with the tax, with harsher consequences for those even farther below that mark.
For Pittsburgh, that is where things get uncomfortable. The Pirates entered 2026 with a franchise-record Opening Day payroll of about $102 million, a figure Nutting and the front office used as proof they were willing to invest in a competitive roster. Under the union’s framework, though, that still comes up roughly $48 million short of the first tax line.
The MLBPA made its first proposal to MLB today in collective bargaining. Among the topline issues:
- A "competitive-integrity tax" for any team that does not spend $150M
- Increase minimum salary from $780,000 to $1.5M
- Increase in base CBT threshold from $244M to $300M
- Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) May 27, 2026
MLB’s plan would attack the issue from a different angle. The owners want a $171.2 million salary floor and a $245.3 million hard cap in 2027, figures that include player benefits and are not directly comparable to standard roster payroll or the union’s proposed threshold. That system would force Pittsburgh to spend more, but it would also put a ceiling on the game’s richest teams, creating a more predictable setup for smaller-market owners.
The players’ approach is built differently. Instead of limiting how much the Dodgers or Yankees can spend, the MLBPA wants to funnel more resources to smaller-market clubs and then punish the ones that still refuse to use them. The proposal also adds extra revenue-sharing rewards for low-revenue teams that win or make the postseason, building in another financial nudge to compete.
That matters in Pittsburgh because the Pirates keep pointing to their market size, while their ownership group remains under scrutiny for how aggressively it will support the roster. The club finished 82-80 in 2026, its first winning season since 2018, but still missed the playoffs. Paul Skenes and Konnor Griffin give the organization a promising young core, yet the question hanging over the franchise is whether ownership will spend enough to surround that talent with the right support.
Brandon Lowe’s impending free agency puts that tension in sharp relief. The Pirates could lose one of their most productive hitters just as their competitive window should be opening.
In a system like the one the MLBPA is proposing, Nutting would not only be getting more revenue-sharing help. He would also be under pressure to prove that money is being used to keep players like Lowe or replace them with comparable talent. That changes the discussion from what Pittsburgh can afford to what ownership is willing to do.
None of this is settled. The union’s proposal is only the opening move in negotiations, and there’s no guarantee it becomes part of the next collective bargaining agreement. There are still real questions about whether the revenue-sharing structure would fully solve baseball’s biggest financial gaps.
Still, the message is clear enough. Competitive balance is not just about stopping the sport’s biggest spenders.
It is also about holding smaller-market owners accountable when they have the means to invest and choose not to. If the MLBPA gets its way, that would make life a lot more difficult for Bob Nutting.
In Other News...
Oneil Cruz May Have Shown The Pirates How To Fix A Huge Flaw
The Pirates spent much of 2026 looking overmatched when opposing clubs rolled out a left-handed starter, and the numbers showed it in a hurry. Against those pitchers, Pittsburghs offense lagged well behind where it needed to be, a problem that showed up again and again in the standings and left the club searching for a better answer than the one it had on hand.
Oneil Cruz offered a possible blueprint. After struggling badly in 2025, he made a noticeable leap against left-handed pitching this season and became one of the few bats in the lineup that looked comfortable in that matchup. If the Pirates want to close the gap, they may need to find a veteran right-handed hitter who can punish lefties, while also asking whether the same kind of coaching adjustments that helped Cruz can be applied more broadly. [Read more 🡒]