Pirates Fans Should Be Worried This Problem Goes Far Beyond Ben Cherington

The Pittsburgh Pirates' decision to pass on hiring Matt Arnold as general manager in 2019 underscores fundamental issues within their organization, spotlighted by the Milwaukee Brewers' remarkable World Series triumph and sustained success.

When the Pirates were choosing a new general manager in November 2019, Matt Arnold was right there in the mix. He had spent years inside two organizations that had already figured out how to win small: the Tampa Bay Rays and the Milwaukee Brewers.

Pittsburgh went another way and hired Ben Cherington.

Seven years later, Arnold is part of a Brewers organization celebrating Milwaukee’s first World Series title, while the Pirates are still waiting for their first postseason appearance under Cherington. That gap is the obvious part of the story. The harder question is whether Pittsburgh ever really understood the model it said it wanted to follow.

At the time, Cherington made sense. He had won a World Series as Boston’s general manager in 2013 and carried a strong reputation for scouting and player development.

But Arnold’s background fit Pittsburgh’s reality in a different way. He knew what it took to function inside the financial limits that define small-market baseball.

The Pirates themselves seemed to recognize the challenge when Travis Williams introduced Cherington. Williams acknowledged that other small-market clubs had already figured out how to compete.

Milwaukee is one of them now. Pittsburgh still isn’t.

The Brewers just won 103 games in 2026 before taking their first championship, and their run has been built on sustained excellence. They’ve reached the postseason eight times in nine seasons. That is the standard Milwaukee has set.

Pittsburgh’s rebuild finally produced an 82-80 record in 2026, its first winning season since 2018. That’s a step forward, but it’s still a long way from what Milwaukee has done.

Even so, this isn’t a one-man comparison. Milwaukee’s rise didn’t start with Arnold, and it doesn’t rest on him alone.

David Stearns helped lay the groundwork, and Craig Counsell gave the club stability in the dugout. When both left, the Brewers promoted Arnold and Pat Murphy from within.

That’s where the real difference shows up. Milwaukee didn’t fall apart when key people moved on.

It kept rolling. That takes more than good hires.

It takes scouting, player development and front-office structure strong enough to keep identifying talent and keep the machine moving.

Arnold inherited a winning setup, helped sharpen it and ended up guiding it to a championship. The bigger takeaway is that the Brewers were able to absorb major turnover and still stay on track. That doesn’t happen by accident.

And that leaves Pittsburgh with an uncomfortable question: if Arnold had been the pick in 2019, would things have turned out any differently? Would he have had the same support, the same room to maneuver, the same organizational backing? Would ownership have committed to building the kind of infrastructure that sustains a winner?

There’s no way to know. And that uncertainty is exactly why the Pirates’ issue goes beyond Cherington.

The front office has to answer for a rebuild that needed seven years just to reach a winning record. But ownership is the group that has to create the conditions for real, lasting success.

Milwaukee has shown that small-market teams can build a championship-level operation. The Pirates have talked for years about following that path.

In 2019, they had a chance to hire an executive who had already helped make it work. They chose differently, and the results since then have made the contrast impossible to miss.

Maybe Arnold wouldn’t have solved everything in Pittsburgh. Maybe the same old barriers would have stopped him, too. But that possibility may be the most damning part of all.

The Pirates’ biggest miss might not have been passing on Matt Arnold. It might have been failing to build a place where someone like him could thrive.

In Other News...

Pirates Could Regret Tying Up Bullpen Money In Familiar Name

As the Pirates look ahead to the next offseason, the bullpen figures to be one of the more delicate places to spend. MLB insider Jim Bowden has already floated Gregory Soto as a possible fit, noting the left-handers name recognition and the kind of role he could fill late in games, but any pursuit would come with the usual Pittsburgh question: is this the best place to commit meaningful money when the roster still needs help in several spots?

Sotos 2026 season offered both sides of the argument. He finished with a 3.63 ERA and 16 saves, enough to suggest he can still help anchor a relief mix, but his performance also reflected the kind of inconsistency that can make a bullpen plan feel shaky in a hurry. For a Pirates team that has to be careful with every dollar, the challenge will be deciding whether a familiar arm is worth the price or whether those resources are better spent elsewhere. [Read more 🡒]

Pirates Are Stockpiling Shortstops And One Big Question Follows

The Pirates have made a clear habit of loading up on shortstop talent, adding first-round pick Konnor Griffin, second-round picks Wyatt Sanford and Aiden Ruiz, and other young infielders such as Johan De Los Santos and Darrell Morel. It is the kind of pattern that says as much about organizational thinking as it does about individual prospects, with Pittsburgh treating shortstop as both a premium defensive spot and a source of athleticism that can ripple across a roster.

There is also a more practical side to it: good shortstops tend to hold value, and even the ones who do not stay at the position forever can still become useful pieces somewhere else. For the Pirates, the real question is not whether they have invested in the spot, but how many of these players will remain there as they move through the system and whether one of them eventually becomes the long-term answer the club has been hunting for. [Read more 🡒]

Pirates Face A Costly Spencer Horwitz Question For 2027

Spencer Horwitz is in line to become an arbitration case for the Pirates this winter, and it is a little earlier than the usual timetable. Because of his Super Two status, he is eligible for arbitration despite not yet reaching three years of service time, putting Pittsburgh in position to make a financial decision on a player who looked like part of the long-term picture after a productive first half of 2026.

The issue gets trickier because Horwitz did not finish the season anywhere near that level. After returning from a left hamstring injury and a concussion on his rehab assignment, he struggled badly down the stretch, leaving the Pirates with a projected salary around $2.5 million and a real question about how much they want to commit to a bounce-back bet for 2027. [Read more 🡒]