An ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney for the sports prediction market platform Novig has set off a wave of criticism from female athletes who say it sexualizes women in sports.
In the spot, Sweeney appears with little or no clothing, using footballs and other sports gear to cover parts of her body. The ad is about a minute long and opens with Sweeney holding footballs over her chest as she says, “Think you know sports?
prove it. Novig is just sports.
So they wanted to show just sports. You can trade this sport, and this sport, how about this?
This sport too. Or this.
Sports sports sport sports (etc), you can’t trade this. ”
From there, the commercial keeps cycling through different versions of the same visual: Sweeney, sports equipment, and strategically placed coverage. The message is about sports in general, not men’s sports or women’s sports specifically.
The backlash has been loud. Four-time Olympic swimming gold medalist Ariarne Titmus posted on Instagram, “I can’t describe how infuriated I feel when I watch this,” followed by, “How do we live in a world where monetizing a woman’s body and sexualizing women’s sport is still a thing?” Former U.S. gymnast Gracie Kramer also blasted the campaign, writing on Instagram, “I’ve spent my entire life competing in a sport where female athletes have been oversexualized, reduced to our bodies, and forced to fight to be taken seriously for what we can actually do,” she said on Instagram.
But Sweeney is not an athlete, and the ad is not a statement about women’s sports. That distinction matters here. She’s an actress in a prediction market commercial, not someone presenting herself as a spokesperson for female athletes.
And this kind of imagery is hardly new. Naked or partially naked athlete photo shoots have been around for years, including Julie and Zach Ertz posing for ESPN’s Body issue and the Eagles offensive line doing the same thing. The reaction to those images was not nearly this intense.
The same goes for other familiar examples. Female athletes and female reporters post swimsuit photos on Instagram.
There’s the “walking bets” gig, which leans heavily on appearance. Stadium selfies, thirst traps, and other images clearly aimed at attracting attention have been part of the landscape for a long time.
The question is whether the standard is supposed to change depending on who is doing it, or whether women are being judged by an arbitrary set of rules about what they can and cannot do.
There’s also the larger feminism angle, which some people are eager to turn into a fight. The old “WING BOWL OBJECTIFIES WOMEN” argument comes to mind, along with the “Wingette” point: how can someone be objectified if she chose to participate?
Ava Graham once put it this way: “ Totally forgot how people can be on Twitter. I had fun for all my years doing Wing Bowl and the Eagles won a Super Bowl so life is good.”
That same logic applies here. Sweeney appears to be making her own choices, using her body as she sees fit, and building on a brand that has already made her hugely successful. She is not being forced into the ad, and she is not speaking on behalf of women as a whole.
Stepfanie Tyler on X made a similar point, writing in part:
“Sydney Sweeney is the funniest stress test feminism has ever encountered bc I was taught that tHE PaTriArChY reduces women to their bodies, denies them individual agency and imposes rules on female sexuality based on what everyone else thinks women ought to be. Meanwhile Sydney is independently wealthy, produces her own projects, owns businesses, chooses to monetize her own sexuality, gains power from doing it and appears completely uninterested in anyone’s permission. And somehow the feminist response is thousands of women materializing to explain that her body is AcksHuAllY a collective political resource and she has a responsibility to use it in ways they approve of bc otherwise she’s “setting women back 100 years” (fucking LOL)
So congratulations ladies! You defeated the patriarchy by becoming an enormous decentralized committee of women policing another woman’s sexuality, scolding her for appealing to men and reminding her that her individual choices must remain subordinate to what is best for Women As A Class.
Perhaps the funniest part is that the men supposedly enforcing this grand patriarchal system are mostly standing off to the side like “Sydney seems great, let her cook” while the Feminist Liberation Committee is furiously drafting new regulations for what she’s allowed to do…”
That, at least, captures the contradiction in the debate. The men supposedly running the system are mostly watching from the sidelines, while women are the ones drawing the lines around what Sweeney should or should not be allowed to do.
The comparison to other sports imagery only sharpens the point. No one made a major issue out of Jason Kelce, Lane Johnson, Big V, Isaac Seumalo, and Brandon Brooks getting naked for ESPN.
Zach and Julie Ertz drew attention, too, but not outrage. Even Brandi Chastain’s famous moment after scoring the penalty that won the USWNT the 1999 World Cup - when she took off her shirt and revealed a sports bra on live television in front of millions - was embraced, not condemned.
Maybe the real difference is simple: people had thicker skin then.
In Other News...
Eagles Fans May Not Like Whats Coming To Tailgating
Changes to tailgating at the Eagles sports complex are expected to start on October 4, with hand parking set to become part of the routine. Under that system, attendants will direct vehicles into specific spaces, a shift aimed at curbing the oversized tailgate setups that have been spreading across multiple parking spots and creating traffic and parking headaches around the lots.
For fans, the bigger question now is how much those familiar game-day gatherings will change once the new setup is in place. An official explanation from the Eagles or the Sports Complex Parking Venture is still expected, but until that arrives, tailgaters are left reading the tea leaves on a move that looks designed to tighten control of one of the most visible parts of the pregame scene. [Read more 🡒]
Jalen Carter Sounds Ready But Two Eagles Injury Questions Still Linger
Jalen Carter was back on the practice field with a cast on his right wrist and still sounded like a player expecting to suit up in the next game, a reassuring sign for an Eagles defense that leans on his presence in the middle. His availability matters because Carter changes how opposing offenses have to block up front, and Philadelphia has spent enough time this season dealing with health questions to appreciate any encouraging update, even if it comes with a little extra equipment.
The more unsettled part of the injury picture sits elsewhere, with safety Drew Mukuba out of practice and wearing a compression sleeve on his left leg, while edge rusher Jonathan Greenard continues working his way back from a pec strain. Greenard still has not made his Eagles debut, but the rehabilitation reports have been positive, leaving the team with at least some optimism as it waits to see how quickly the defensive pieces around Carter can come together. [Read more 🡒]
Eagles Are Hiding A Line Decision Tennessee Could Expose
Landon Dickersons move to injured reserve has left the Eagles with a real early-season puzzle on the offensive line, and they have been noticeably tight-lipped about how they plan to solve it. With Dickerson sidelined by a bone bruise in his knee until at least Week 6, the discussion has shifted to who gets the next turn inside, with Drew Kendall, Willie Lampkin and Fred Johnson all in the mix as the team tries to protect its interior and keep the offense on schedule.
The timing makes the secrecy a little more interesting, because Tennessee offers exactly the kind of front that can test an unsettled line. The Titans bring a tough interior rush led by All-Pro Jeffery Simmons and John Franklin-Myers, which means the Eagles may not get much time to keep this decision under wraps once the game starts. If there is a wrinkle here, Tennessee has the personnel to expose it. [Read more 🡒]