Penn State’s matchup with Purdue drew three different predictions, and the split is pretty clear: one vote for the Nittany Lions, one for the Boilermakers, and one from a Purdue beat writer who still sees Penn State edging it.
Joe Smeltzer of Nittany Sports Now thinks this is the kind of game Penn State’s offense has to answer for. He pointed to Purdue as statistically the third-worst defense in the Big Ten and said this is the moment for the Nittany Lions to finally show something on that side of the ball.
“I think to quote Elvis Presley, it’s really now or never for this Penn State offense. If you’re not going to get it done against, statistically, the third-worst defense in the Big Ten, I don’t know when Penn State is ever going to break out offensively.
So I think it’s going to be kind of a game that Purdue is accustomed to score-wise. There’s going to be a lot of points on both sides, but I think at the end of the day, Penn State probably just has a little more firepower than Purdue has in playing at home, so I think Penn State’s finally able to run the ball.
I think Rocco Becht shows some flashes, and Penn State gets it done.”
His score: Penn State 35, Purdue 28.
Kyle “Fatman” Golik went the other direction. He said this is the first time all season he’s strayed from his preseason picks, and he doesn’t see Penn State finding its footing here.
“You’re saying it’s now or never. I’m just going to answer the question. It’s going to be the first time all season that I’ve gone against my preseason predictions, and I’m just going to say it’s never for this Penn State team.”
Golik said Penn State looks like a team still trying to figure itself out under pressure, while Purdue feels like the side with momentum and a real incentive to keep pushing toward bowl eligibility. He also expects points, but not much resistance from either pass rush.
“Like they’re punching with momentum, and you know I really like what Purdue brings offensively. Neither team’s going to get to the quarterback, but I’m going to throw this out there: I think Rocco Becht gets pulled at the half in this game.”
He thinks Alex Manske gets a shot and that “Manske’s not ready.”
His prediction: Purdue 31, Penn State 16.
Sam King, who covers Purdue for the Journal & Courier, stuck with the Penn State pick he’s already made elsewhere, but he still expects a game with some back-and-forth to it. He said he’s not about to change his call and then get hammered for it online.
“So I do a lot of these for various outlets. I picked Penn State 30 to 24. I’m not going to go against what I’ve told other people because somehow that will get found out and I’ll get reamed for it on social media.”
King said Penn State’s earlier losses have looked different in hindsight, with Wisconsin and Northwestern both turning out to be better than they first appeared. He also called USC a very good team and described Michigan as a talented but underachieving group, then compared Penn State to Purdue in that same way: a team with more talent that hasn’t fully put it together.
He said the game could turn into a shootout, but in his view it will likely hinge on whether Purdue can get more production from the rest of its offense beyond the main playmakers.
“I think one of those other guys is going to have to step up and have a big game against that secondary, or Penn State’s going to be able to hold off Purdue and kind of keep them chasing the whole game.”
King’s pick: Penn State 30, Purdue 24.
In Other News...
Penn State Fans May Notice One Strange Thing About Seattle Tickets
Penn States first Big Ten win under Matt Campbell gave the program a needed lift, but the attention around the next trip is turning to something a little less on-field: the cost of getting into Seattle. Ticket prices for the upcoming game against Washington are sitting in the $53 to $75 range, a number shaped by Washingtons recent play and the fact that the matchup is on the road in Seattle.
Even with those prices landing in the same neighborhood as Washingtons final home game against Indiana, attendance is expected to be light for the Penn State game. That makes the market feel a bit unusual for a high-profile nonconference trip, with the price tag not exactly matching the level of local demand the Huskies might normally expect. [Read more 🡒]
Penn State Could Be Headed For A Bowl Matchup Fans Didn't Expect
Baylors turnaround under interim coach Joe Klanderman has put the Bears back into the bowl picture, and that in turn has created a few possible postseason paths that could matter to Penn State fans. After beating UCF to move to 5-3, Baylor needs one more win to lock up bowl eligibility, and the projections around the program have started to widen, with several outlets floating a range of opponents from Missouri and Florida to FAU, Army and Penn State.
For the Nittany Lions, the interesting part is not just that Baylor has re-entered the conversation, but that the matchup options are still unsettled enough to leave room for a surprise. Baylors recent form and the players driving it have made the Bears a more credible bowl draw than they looked earlier in the year, and the challenge they could present would depend heavily on which version of the team shows up in December. [Read more 🡒]
Penn State Snap Counts Hint At A Sudden Role Shift
Penn States latest snap counts against Purdue offered a clearer look at how the staff is sorting through its rotation as injuries and game flow continue to shape who is on the field. The numbers showed changes in playing time on both sides of the ball, with several offensive and defensive pieces taking on different workloads than they had earlier in the season, while Cam Wallaces rushing production and Yvan Kemajous defensive presence stood out in the box score.
Amid those shifts, Matt Campbell singled out freshman Amarion Jackson for praise, a noteworthy sign that the staff is comfortable expanding his role as the season moves along. For a team still adjusting week to week, the snap distribution suggests the depth chart is anything but settled, and the next round of game reps should reveal whether these changes are temporary fixes or the start of something more permanent. [Read more 🡒]