Penn State Still Feels The Fallout From One Costly Decision

As Penn State grapples with a rocky season and public criticism, the decision to part ways with James Franklin and hire Matt Campbell raises pressing questions about the program's future.

A year after James Franklin was pushed out, Penn State is staring at the same kind of mess that forced the change in the first place.

Franklin was fired on Oct. 12, 2025, by athletic director Pat Kraft after a third straight Big Ten loss. The Nittany Lions had walked into that season with national championship expectations and all the confidence in the world.

Instead, everything cracked. What followed was a 54-day coaching search that turned chaotic and, at one point, embarrassing before Kraft settled on Matt Campbell as Franklin’s replacement.

Now the mood around Penn State has turned again. After a promising 3-0 start, losses to Wisconsin, Northwestern and USC wiped out any shot at a College Football Playoff push. Just like that, the season has gone off the rails at the halfway point for the second year in a row.

That has naturally reopened the discussion about Franklin’s firing, Campbell’s hiring and, more than anything, the way Penn State handled the whole search. And at 366 days removed from one of the biggest decisions in school history, the biggest point is still the same: keeping Franklin was not the answer.

His 12-year run had reached its end. That was true then and it is still true now. Penn State was supposed to contend in 2025 after years of falling short, but the old issues showed up again - quarterback development, receiver talent and folding under pressure when the expectations were highest.

It is easy for outside voices, especially the national people who never lived through the Franklin era up close, to look back and act like Penn State made a mistake. But the record under Franklin told the story.

There was plenty of winning. There was plenty of success.

It was still time to move on.

The real debate is about how Kraft and Penn State handled what came next.

That becomes even sharper when you look at Bob Chesney. He was a Pennsylvania native who had real interest in the Penn State opening, and Penn State fans have to watch him now and wonder what might have been.

Chesney has Arizona? No - UCLA.

He became the first UCLA head coach to start 5-0, then knocked off then-No. 13 Oregon in the kind of environment that gets everybody’s attention.

The Bruins are now No. 12 in the AP Top 25 and have a real path to the CFP.

The timing made it sting even more. Chesney’s win over Oregon ended minutes before Penn State kicked off its loss to USC. That kind of contrast is hard to miss.

Chesney, from Kulpmont, was interested in the Penn State job. Kraft could have had him.

But as Penn State kept zeroing in on BYU’s Kalani Sitake and as UCLA needed its answer, Chesney had to make a call. He could not sit around and wait.

He reportedly took the UCLA job on Dec. 1.

Five days later, Penn State and Campbell reached their agreement.

That brings the focus back to the search itself. Penn State gave Kraft time after firing Franklin, and he did not make the most of it.

As the weeks rolled by, candidates like Curt Cignetti, Matt Rhule, Mike Elko and Brian Brohm landed contract extensions elsewhere. LSU, Florida and other programs fired and hired coaches.

By the time Penn State made its move, it was the last power conference opening to fill.

Kraft’s push on Sitake was a dead end. I wrote then that it was an “unmitigated mess.” Not because Sitake was guaranteed to be the right hire, but because trying to pull the longtime BYU coach away from Provo was always going to be a fool’s errand.

That sequence mattered. It cost Penn State the chance to fully pursue Chesney. And it left Campbell trying to build under less-than-ideal circumstances.

By the time Campbell arrived, national signing day had already passed and Penn State had signed only two prospects. Franklin was always going to take recruits to Blacksburg, but having a coach in place earlier would have at least allowed Penn State to assemble a real class.

Those recruits might not have changed this season right away, but they would have reduced the need to lean so heavily on 24 Iowa State transfers, most of whom have not delivered much so far.

Campbell and his staff have put together a solid 2027 class, but the lack of a 2026 group means next season’s hopes will hinge on what happens in the transfer portal.

Campbell is not off the hook for the way this year has gone, either. His in-game choices have been rough, including the odd timeout usage against USC.

The quarterback he chose to bring with him has not been good enough. The roster, plain and simple, has not been good enough to compete in the Big Ten.

He should own that, and he should keep owning it if he wants to win over a Penn State fan base that expects answers fast.

At the same time, if Chesney keeps rolling at UCLA, his name and Campbell’s will stay connected in Penn State’s story. Chesney will be the biggest “what if” from this search.

Still, five games and one major upset do not prove Penn State blew the hire by passing on him. And a 3-3 start does not prove Campbell was the wrong choice, either - especially with the eight-year, $70 million deal attached to him.

Maybe Penn State will eventually regret not taking Chesney. Maybe it will regret hiring Campbell. Maybe neither happens.

What Kraft ought to regret is the process. That search a year ago put Penn State behind then, and it is still dragging the program down now.

In Other News...

Penn State Used White Out Weekend To Turn Up Recruiting Pressure

White Out weekend has long been Penn States best stage for making a first impression, and this years recruiting version leaned hard into that advantage. More than 100 prospects came through campus, giving the staff a chance to showcase the atmosphere to a group that included most of the 2027 class and several highly regarded 2028 players. Eighteen of the 22 committed players in that 2027 group were on hand, a useful sign for a class that is currently ranked No. 20 nationally.

The event also gave Penn State a chance to keep pushing ahead while the calendar still has room to shift. Along with hosting the visitors, the program handed out new offers to players in the 2028, 2029 and 2030 classes, widening the board while the buzz from the weekend was still fresh. For a staff that knows how much the White Out setting can matter, the message was clear: the pressure is on now, long before these recruiting battles reach the finish line. [Read more 🡒]

Penn State Suddenly Has A Defensive Problem It Cant Ignore

Penn States defense hit a rough patch in Week 6, and Marcus Neal Jr. ended up at the center of it. The Iowa State transfer safety was benched after struggling in coverage during Big Ten play, a reminder that the Lions portal-heavy approach does not always come with instant answers, especially when the schedule tightens and the margins get smaller.

Neal is not the only former Cyclone who has had trouble settling in. Linebackers Kooper Ebel and Jeremiah Cooper have also underperformed, with tackling and coverage issues becoming part of the conversation. For a defense that wants to stay dependable deep into conference play, the question now is whether Penn State needs to lean less on some of those Iowa State transfers and give younger options a bigger look. [Read more 🡒]

Penn State Backfield Battle Just Got More Complicated After White Out Loss

Penn States White Out loss to USC did more than sting on the scoreboard. It also offered a clearer look at how the Nittany Lions are sorting through their backfield rotation, with the snap counts from the game showing some shifting usage in the run game as the staff continues to search for the right mix.

Marcus Neal Jr. was also out of the lineup, and coach Matt Campbell pointed to the game plan as part of the reason his role changed. Campbell said the defensive approach leaned more heavily toward coverage than tackling ability, which helps explain why Neal did not see the field in that matchup. [Read more 🡒]