When the world's top hockey nation falls short in two Olympic gold medal games, both decided by the fast-paced, three-on-three overtime format, it's bound to spark some lively debate. Is this really the best way to crown champions on such a grand stage?
Sure, three-on-three is thrilling, but it transforms hockey into something entirely different. Imagine deciding the Super Bowl with a seven-on-seven overtime-sounds a bit off, doesn't it?
Coach Green shared his thoughts on the matter, expressing a sentiment many in the hockey community agree with: "I'm not sure I've heard a hockey person tell me otherwise that they think games of that magnitude should be three on three," he remarked. "I think it should just be played five on five until someone wins."
Green's stance isn't new. He voiced similar concerns before last year's 4 Nations Face-off, where Canada clinched the title in a three-on-three finale. Despite his reservations, Green was all praise for the skill level displayed in Sunday's Olympic final.
"What a game," Green exclaimed. "You hope for a great matchup, and that's exactly what we got. The two best teams in the tournament went head-to-head."
He noted Canada's dominance in play and highlighted Hellebuyck's exceptional performance. Both teams battled fiercely, leaving little room on the ice.
Contrary to expectations of high-scoring affairs, the defensive prowess and determination of these teams kept the offense in check. "Both teams put on a great show, and one team's gotta win," Green added.
As the Olympians return to Ottawa, Lars Eller has already hit the ice for practice with the Senators. Coach Green expects the rest of the team to be ready for their first post-Olympic game against the Detroit Red Wings this Thursday at the CTC.