Oregon State's O-Line Gets Relief As Bigger Fight Still Looms

Oregon State players Van Wells and Jaheim Patterson remain eligible after a surprising court ruling, boosting the Beavers' bid for back-to-back victories.

Oregon State got good news Tuesday in Benton County Circuit Court: Van Wells and Jaheim Patterson can keep playing this season.

Judge Donohue extended an injunction that lets both players remain eligible under the NCAA’s new age-based eligibility rule. The players are seeking a fifth year of eligibility this season under the NCAA’s new age-based eligibility rule.

Donohue said there was enough evidence in the case to allow it to go to a full trial. He set a date of Oct. 25 for the next hearing on the issue, with a trial date to be set at that time.

That could keep the two players eligible through the end of the regular season, which runs through late November.

Patterson said he didn’t “need” Tuesday’s hearing, but learned he could continue to play “means a lot.”

“I can be there for my team, be a team player, whatever the team needs,” Patterson said.

Wells said continuing to play “means everything to me.”

“Even though I came late, guys are basically my brothers now,” Wells said. “Playing the game that I love to play and continuing to be able to play at this level means a lot to me and my family. So I’m extremely excited about it.”

The situation is a little less dire at the safety position. Oregon State has relied heavily on veteran Sailasa Vadrawale III, but Patterson provides an additional veteran presence.

The team is short-handed at cornerback and having Patterson available gives coaches more flexibility to move players around in the secondary.

The legal argument centered on the NCAA’s new age-based eligibility rule.

The NCAA was represented by attorney Sarah Kelly-Gilgore of Holland & Knight. She presented one witness, Jennifer Henderson, managing director at the NCAA.

Henderson walked the court through the process of adopting the new age-based eligibility rule. She noted that the rule was unanimously approved by the NCAA member schools, including Oregon State.

Once approved, it was set to take effect for the 2025-26 academic year.

Attorney Alexander Bish of Stoel Rives represented Patterson and Wells. His primary argument is that the effective date for the new rule is not part of the bylaw itself. He said the NCAA could have put the date into the bylaw, but chose not to.

He presented past enforcement cases in which the NCAA relied on its bylaws, not the underlying proposals, to make its argument. His belief is that according to the bylaw itself, Patterson and Wells should be eligible.

That argument was enough to convince Donohue that the matter deserves a full trial.

Bish also argued that because a full trial in this case would not take place until later this fall, the case would effectively be moot. He requested a trial date be set as soon as possible.

Donohue agreed to move as quickly as possible and asked the parties to come to the Oct. 25 hearing ready to set a trial date.

Donohue disagreed with the idea that this trial would be moot. He said other sports at Oregon State have not yet begun and the result of this case could be relevant to those athletes.

In Other News...

Beavers Finally Have This Over Oregon And Fans Cant Enjoy It

Oregon State may only be 1-2, but the Beavers have looked like the better team in the early going, and that has made the latest chapter of the rivalry feel a little upside-down. Oregon has the prettier record at 2-1, yet the Ducks have not matched the same level of play, while the Beavers have shown enough life under JaMarcus Shephard to keep the idea of a winning season on the table.

Kevin Griffin, Oregon States athletic director, framed the rivalry as something bigger than football, saying it matters to the culture of the state as the teams head toward a long gap before they meet again. The odd part for Beavers fans is that even with the satisfaction of seeing their side play better right now, there is not much immediate room to savor it, with the matchup not set to resume until several years from now. [Read more 🡒]

Oregon State Special Teams Showed Promise But One Concern Still Lingers

Oregon States special teams gave the Beavers plenty to build on against Montana, with Xayvion Noland providing the kind of burst in the return game that can change field position in a hurry. Punter AJ Winsor and kicker Caleb Ojeda also did their jobs, while kickoff specialist Jaydn Oh consistently pushed the action deep enough to produce multiple touchbacks, a sign the unit looked more organized and more dangerous than it has at times.

Still, the day was not spotless, and the biggest concern was not hard to spot. Penalties on special teams remain a focus, and the Beavers also had a return sequence they would probably like back, the sort of mistake that keeps a promising performance from turning into a fully clean one. For a group trying to prove it can be a real asset, the challenge now is keeping the good field-position gains while tightening the details that can undo them. [Read more 🡒]

Oregon State Just Got A Huge Ruling On Two Key Veterans

Oregon State got a meaningful break in court this week, as Benton County Circuit Court judge Matthew Donohue granted a preliminary injunction that lets Jaheim Patterson and Van Wells keep playing while their case against the NCAA moves forward. The two veterans are challenging the five-for-five eligibility rule, and their lawsuit is aimed at regaining eligibility while also shielding the Beavers from any penalties tied to their participation.

The ruling keeps the situation in motion, not finished, with a status hearing set for Oct. 27 before a trial date is established. For Oregon State, the immediate benefit is obvious: Patterson and Wells remain available as the legal fight continues, and the next court date will help determine how long that relief lasts. [Read more 🡒]