College football’s money race has changed fast, and the latest roster-budget numbers make that plain.
A $20 million roster used to look like a giant. In 2024, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork publicly said the Buckeyes’ football roster cost that much, and it was widely believed to be the biggest figure in the sport.
That same Ohio State team later won the national championship. Two years later, though, a $20 million roster would barely stand out in the Big Ten.
Ohio State and Texas, the team it just faced, are now believed to be spending around $50 million.
That escalation is exactly why The Athletic spent the summer trying to pin down what Power 4 schools are paying for their 2026 rosters. The project pulled information from more than 70 sources across the sport and leaned on as many independent, trustworthy estimates as possible from people inside and outside programs. Exact numbers, as it turned out, were the hardest part.
One big takeaway: getting clean figures is close to impossible. Plenty of people inside football buildings don’t actually know the full number.
Others know it but won’t say it, even off the record. Coaches tend to talk the number down to manage expectations or keep players from pushing for more, while administrators have every incentive to inflate it so they can look like elite fundraisers.
The flip side is that people are always eager to talk about what the competition has, especially if it’s more than they do. That kind of information gets used fast in meetings with bosses and boosters. But even then, the intel isn’t always solid.
What the reporting did make clear is that the ceiling has shot up. The top of the market for 2026 roster budgets is around $50 million, with Ohio State, Oregon, LSU, Miami and Texas all at least in that neighborhood.
Texas Tech comes in at $38-42 million, which may surprise anyone expecting it to sit in the very top tier. The Red Raiders are behind bigger spenders such as Notre Dame and Texas A&M. Their number may also have been trimmed by $3-4 million after quarterback Brendan Sorsby, a coveted transfer from Cincinnati who was found to have committed thousands of NCAA gambling violations, left the team this summer and gave up his fight to keep his eligibility.
Alabama and Georgia also don’t look quite as flush as they did in the pre-NIL era. Alabama sits at $38-42 million, while Georgia is at $31-34 million. The numbers suggest Kalen DeBoer and, especially, Kirby Smart are not operating in the same financial lane as some other national-title hopefuls.
Indiana’s Curt Cignetti said after beating Miami in the national title game, “Our NIL is nowhere near where people think it is.” But the estimates tell a different story. Indiana checks in at $36-40 million, which puts the Hoosiers in the Big Ten’s top five and alongside Michigan and USC.
Conference-wide, the ACC and Big 12 trail the Big Ten and SEC in most cases. The median ranges come out to $18-22 million in the Big 12, $20-24 million in the ACC, $24-28 million in the Big Ten and $31-35 million in the SEC.
That gap between the SEC and Big Ten is notable, but the structure of the two leagues matters too. The SEC has 10 teams at $29 million or more, while the Big Ten has seven. At the same time, the Big Ten has five teams starting at $20 million or less, and no SEC team starts below $22 million.
The Big 12 is even more bottom-heavy. Twelve of its 16 teams have ranges that begin below $20 million. The ACC has six in that category, and the Big Ten has four.
At the very bottom of the range are just four teams that start below $15 million: Arizona at $13-18 million, Iowa State at $13-17 million, Duke at $12-15 million and Boston College at $8-13 million. Duke’s number was cut by $3-4 million after quarterback Darian Mensah left for Miami in January. Boston College stands alone as the only school with an estimated range that starts in the single digits.
In Other News...
Ohio State Has A Ryan Day Problem Fans Cant Ignore
Ohio States recent habit of watching comfortable fourth-quarter leads shrink has turned into more than a bad stretch. The Buckeyes have had the kind of defensive fatigue and late-game confusion that can undo otherwise solid afternoons, and the issue has shown up in consecutive games enough to raise real questions about how the team closes.
Ryan Days program has been especially vulnerable when opponents keep pushing the pace and the defense is forced to hold up under pressure. The loss to Texas only sharpened the concern, since the Longhorns have brought a steadier offensive identity over multiple seasons while Ohio State has struggled to adjust and protect leads when games turn critical. [Read more 🡒]
Ryan Day Just Put Ohio State's Punt Decisions On Notice
Ohio States special teams already had a spotlight on them after the loss to Texas, and Ryan Day only sharpened it when he revisited the punt decision from Texas 39-yard line. The Buckeyes chose to kick on 4th-and-4, and the result was a 26-yard net that left plenty of room for second-guessing. Day still defended the call, while also pointing to punter Joe McGuires talent and framing the issue as more about execution than philosophy.
Robby Discher was brought in this offseason as special teams coordinator with the expectation that this phase would get cleaner, and Days comments suggested the Buckeyes are watching closely to see whether that happens. If the operation stays inconsistent, the comfort level on similar fourth-down decisions may start to change, especially in the kinds of high-leverage spots that can swing a top-end game. The message was clear enough: the punts are not automatic if the returns keep coming up short. [Read more 🡒]
Ohio State May Have Found A Young Defensive Difference Maker
Riley Pettijohns role in Ohio States loss to Texas was one of the quieter bright spots for a defense that spent much of the night under pressure. The young linebacker logged a career-high 37 snaps while moving around to multiple spots, and he flashed enough disruption to stand out even in a tough result. He also fit in with a broader theme from the game, as other young Buckeyes like Jay Timmons and Khary Wilder showed they may be ready for bigger chances too.
Ryan Day has already signaled that Pettijohns workload should keep growing, and it is easy to see why the staff is intrigued. The linebacker has shown a knack for slipping blocks and finding the football, the kind of trait that can change how a defense feels from one week to the next. Ohio State still has to sort out the bigger picture after the loss, but Pettijohns emergence gives the Buckeyes something real to build on. [Read more 🡒]