Ohio State Has A Legit CFP Ranking Complaint After First Bracket

As the 2026 College Football Playoff rankings stir debate, questions arise over Alabama's controversial top-five spot and the apparent biases of the selection committee.

The first College Football Playoff rankings of 2026 were always going to spark a fight, and this week’s reveal delivered exactly that. The committee’s opening bracket set off the usual round of second-guessing, but the loudest pushback centered on three teams in particular: Alabama, Notre Dame and Indiana.

Alabama’s spot in the top five drew the sharpest criticism. The Tide’s best win is at Kentucky, and they are 2-2 against other CFP top 25 teams, with back-to-back losses to Georgia and Tennessee.

That Tennessee team, notably, landed eight spots below Alabama. Six teams ranked behind the Tide have better records against the committee’s ranked opponents, yet the selectors still leaned on Alabama’s win over Mississippi State as part of the case for placing them so high.

Notre Dame’s ranking also raised eyebrows. The case against the Irish is straightforward enough: they lost their only game against a ranked opponent, at BYU, they don’t have a signature win, and their schedule doesn’t stand out.

Even so, they have dominated the teams in front of them. Notre Dame leads college football with a 27-point average margin of victory, and the committee’s lower placement than the No. 4 spot in the AP poll suggests the Irish are being punished more for the strength of their opponents than for anything they’ve done on the field.

Indiana’s position brought a different kind of scrutiny. The reigning national champion has not beaten a single team currently ranked by the CFP selection committee, and its non-conference schedule was weak, with no Power Four non-Big Ten opponent on it.

The Hoosiers have also been living dangerously lately, with their last three wins all coming by seven points or fewer, including back-to-back overtime escapes against Michigan and Minnesota. Their only game against a higher-tier opponent was a loss to Ohio State, which somehow sits eight spots ahead of them.

Ohio State’s own placement adds another layer to the debate. The Buckeyes are inside the top 12, but they would not be in the playoff if it started today because the Group of Six representative would take the No. 12 seed.

Still, Ohio State has the No. 2 strength of record and the No. 10 strength of schedule, and it beat Indiana on the road. It also lost by one point to current No.

7 Texas, the kind of “quality loss” that apparently carries real weight with the committee.

That made committee chairman Hunter Yurachek’s explanation even more striking. On live television, he said his group did not take Ohio State’s head-to-head win over Indiana into account. For anyone charged with ranking college football teams, that was a jarring admission.

In Other News...

Ohio States CFP Ranking Just Reignited A Frustrating Committee Debate

The first College Football Playoff rankings of 2026 immediately stirred up the same old arguments, with Miami opening at No. 1 and Georgia, Utah, Indiana and Alabama filling out the top five. For Ohio State fans watching the board, the early reveal was a reminder that the committee is once again leaning into a rsum-versus-results debate that never seems to go away, especially when teams with head-to-head advantages are separated or an unbeaten team like UCLA gets pushed behind squads with losses.

Utahs No. 3 spot drew plenty of attention, too, since the Utes have only one ranked win, and committee chair Hunter Yurachek spent part of the explanation cycle defending how the group compares teams across conferences and record profiles. For a Buckeyes audience, the bigger issue is familiar: if the opening rankings already feel inconsistent, the next few weeks are likely to bring even more scrutiny to every movement, every comparison and every decision the committee makes. [Read more 🡒]

Ohio State Still Has Two Big Lineup Questions Before Oregon

Ohio State came out of its trip to USC with two injury concerns hanging over the week ahead, and both sit in spots that matter a lot for what comes next. Defensive tackle Eddrick Houston and left tackle Ian Moore were hurt in the game, and Ryan Days latest update at least offered some clarity on one front, with Houston expected back soon as the Buckeyes turn their attention to Oregon.

Moore is the bigger unknown, and his status still depends on how he progresses in the days leading up to the matchup. For a team already working through the usual midseason grind, the left tackle spot is one of the most important places to have uncertainty, especially with Oregon on deck and Day continuing to balance injury management, staff decisions, and game prep all at once. [Read more 🡒]

Jeremiah Smith Already Has Oregon Sounding Concerned About The Rematch

Oregons 32-31 escape over Ohio State last season still hangs over this matchup, and the rematch is already drawing plenty of attention because of what the Buckeyes bring back on offense. Jeremiah Smith has become the name that keeps coming up, and Oregon coach Dan Lanning made it clear he is well aware of the receivers impact as the teams head toward another high-stakes meeting.

Ohio State has turned the upcoming game into its Scarlet the Shoe event, adding another layer to a night that already carries plenty of weight in Columbus. The Buckeyes will be looking to protect their home winning streak while also trying to flip the script from a loss that still lingers, and Smiths presence is a big reason the rematch feels different before it even kicks off. [Read more 🡒]