The ACC is changing the way it sorts out its football standings, and the timing says everything. After last season’s title-game mess sent an eight-win Duke team into the championship game while Miami - the league’s best team by record and No. 12 in the College Football Playoff rankings - was left out, the conference announced a new tiebreaker system Wednesday at its media days.
The overhaul is aimed at avoiding another year like 2025, when Duke advanced on the fifth tiebreaker and then beat Virginia for the conference crown. The conference had a five-way tie for second place, and the deciding factor wound up being the combined winning percentage of conference opponents, a measure that had little to do with which team was actually strongest. That outcome clearly left the league looking for something cleaner.
ACC leaders pointed to three main reasons for the change. First, they wanted the title game to feature the conference’s best teams, not a team that looked out of place on paper.
Second, the ACC’s schedule is getting more complicated as it moves to nine conference games this season to match the other Power 4 leagues. And third, the College Football Playoff has raised the stakes even more.
“There was some discussion [of using CFP rankings], but it came back to the guiding principles. That would be dismissing the conference schedule. It’s a conference championship game and your conference results should matter more than non-conference to determine who plays in your game.”
That came from ACC SVP of Football Michael Strickland, who also said: “Head-to-head results need to matter and then we wanted to make sure we were treating everybody fairly from whoever is playing eight games versus who is playing nine games based on the luck of the draw,”
The schedule issue is no small thing. The ACC is now a 17-team league after the arrivals of Stanford, Cal and SMU, so not every team will play the same number of conference games.
In 2026, 12 teams will play nine conference games while five will play eight. Beginning in 2027, 16 teams will play nine and one team will play eight on a rotating basis each year.
That kind of split creates obvious problems when the standings get tight.
The new system starts by redefining what a tie actually is. Teams will be considered tied not just when they have the same record, but when they have the same number of conference wins or conference losses. That means a 7-2 team can be treated as tied with a 7-1 team so no one is “overly rewarded or penalized” because of the schedule.
From there, head-to-head results are supposed to do the heavy lifting. If one tied team beat another tied team in conference play, that team gets the edge.
In larger ties, the conference will first look at head-to-head results among common opponents. If one team has the best record in those matchups, it advances.
If that still doesn’t settle things, the commissioner can resolve it through a draw, and the process can restart if needed.
The same basic structure applies when three or more tied teams are not all common opponents. The team that beat each of the other tied teams advances.
The team that lost to each of the other tied teams is removed. If that still leaves the tie unresolved, the commissioner or commissioner’s designee can step in again with a draw.
The real escape hatch is the Team Success Ranking. If head-to-head results don’t solve the problem, that metric - the same one used by the College Football Playoff committee to evaluate overall body of work - becomes the next key piece.
The ACC had used the Team Success Ranking before, but it was buried deep in the old tiebreaker order. Last season, in that five-way tie, it sat at No. 6, behind the combined winning percentage of conference opponents that ultimately sent Duke to the title game and kept Miami out.
Under the new setup, that ranking would have come much earlier. If it had been in place last year, Miami would have advanced to face Virginia for the championship based on its résumé.
So the ACC has done what it clearly wanted to do: simplify the process, lean harder on head-to-head results and résumé strength, and make sure the league’s title game is decided in a way that fits the playoff era.
In Other News...
Former UNC Player Makes Surprising Push For Another College Season
A familiar name is back in the eligibility conversation, and it could end up mattering far beyond Chapel Hill. A group of college basketball players is suing the NCAA over the new 5-for-5 rule, arguing for an extra season of competition eligibility, and the case has drawn in former Tar Heel Cade Tyson after his time at North Carolina and Minnesota. Tyson entered the transfer portal after the 2025-2026 season, and the possibility of another year has already put him back on the radar for programs looking for proven scoring help.
The lawsuit is aimed at the NCAAs decision not to grant an additional year to this years senior class under the new rule, which makes the outcome especially relevant for players whose college careers have already taken a few turns. Tysons situation is a reminder of how quickly roster plans can change in the modern game, and why a ruling here could ripple into the transfer market before the next season even gets moving. [Read more 🡒]
Jim Phillips Just Changed Something That Could Hit UNC Later
Jim Phillips used his turn at the 2025 ACC Kickoff in Charlotte to put several league priorities back in the spotlight, and one of them could matter to North Carolina later in the week. The ACC commissioner backed the Protect College Sports Act, talked up a new tiebreaker for the conference, and again signaled that he wants the College Football Playoff to grow to 24 teams. He also said the league plans to improve the replay room experience, part of an ongoing push to make the conference feel more polished and more consistent in the eyes of coaches and fans.
For UNC, the timing is notable because the Tar Heels are still set to speak later in the event. Phillips comments set the table for the kind of issues the program may be asked to address, from how the league should organize itself to where it fits in a broader playoff picture. Even without the full details of the tiebreaker, the message was clear enough: the ACC is trying to tighten up its structure now, before those changes start affecting teams like North Carolina on the field. [Read more 🡒]
Steve Belichick Faces Huge Pressure In UNC's Defensive Rebuild
North Carolinas defensive rebuild has already started to take shape, and the linebacker room is one of the clearest places where the changes show up. New starters are expected there, with Peyton Seelmann and Derek McDonald stepping into bigger roles as the Tar Heels try to stabilize a unit that will look different from last season. For Steve Belichick, who serves as both linebackers coach and defensive coordinator, that makes this group especially important because so much of the defenses direction will flow through how quickly these pieces come together.
The challenge is not just finding the right starters, but making sure the position holds up once the games begin to pile up. McDonald is expected to be a central voice in the middle, while the rest of the depth chart remains less settled, which puts even more pressure on Belichicks teaching and development. North Carolina does not need a perfect defense to make progress, but it does need this rebuild to move beyond survival mode if the unit is going to become more than just functional in 2026. [Read more 🡒]