Hal Steinbrenner pointed the finger at the Yankees’ lineup after the club’s season ended, and the offense had made that critique easy to level. New York managed only five runs in a three-game ALDS sweep at the hands of the Tampa Bay Rays, a flat finish for a group that was second in home runs during the regular season but never fully turned that power into a consistently dangerous attack.
The issue, though, runs deeper than one October series. The Yankees have built a reputation around analytics, but on the hitting side, that approach appears to have produced more rigidity than flexibility. Instead of shaping a lineup that can win in different ways, New York has leaned hard into power and left too little room for other offensive skill sets to matter.
That’s where the comparison with clubs like the Rays and Milwaukee Brewers gets uncomfortable for the Yankees. Those teams are among the most data-driven in baseball, but their use of analytics is tied to variety.
They identify what each hitter does best and put that strength to work in specific matchups. The Yankees, by contrast, have often operated with a more uniform blueprint, asking too many hitters to fit the same mold.
Analytics also matter well beyond roster-building, and that is another place where the Yankees have looked uneven. The data is supposed to help hitters and pitchers spot weaknesses and attack them. New York’s pitchers have generally seemed more willing to embrace that process than the hitters have.
Some of the younger players have taken to it. Ben Rice and George Lombard Jr. have both put in the work preparing for opponents, and Rice has developed a reputation among teammates for being "data-driven more so than most."
Gary Phillips of the New York Daily News also noted that the Yankees’ hitters aren’t as receptive to analytics as the pitchers are.
One thing I touched on in here that I'd like to dive into more at some point is that the #Yankees' hitters, generally speaking, are not as receptive to analytics as their pitchers. Not saying more buy-in and data will cure their problems, but there has been stark contrast over… https://t.co/WTPYkVsfFm
The pitching side shows what that buy-in can look like. Matt Blake has used a data-heavy approach to get more out of Clay Holmes, Luke Weaver, Brent Headrick and Paul Blackburn, and he helped Cam Schlittler develop into one of the best pitchers in baseball as a second-year player. The formula is straightforward: find what works, lean into it, and attack a hitter’s weakness.
Not every Yankee hitter has ignored that kind of information. Giancarlo Stanton welcomes any data he can use to prepare for a pitcher, knowing he can do real damage when he squares up a mistake. Aaron Judge, meanwhile, largely ignores the underlying data, but his results in 2024 and 2025 suggest he doesn’t need to change anything.
The bigger frustration came from players whose approaches never seemed to adjust when the results stalled. Jazz Chisholm Jr., Trent Grisham and Ryan McMahon all went through extended slumps, and their at-bats did not show much variation as those dry spells dragged on.
Chisholm’s case stood out for another reason. He stole 41 bases despite posting only a .312 on-base percentage, and the argument here is that a greater emphasis on the improved plate discipline he has shown since joining the Yankees could have created even more stolen-base chances and more run-producing opportunities for the lineup.
What the Yankees need now is a better balance. Their current construction puts too much weight on one offensive trait, while other useful skills are either underused or ignored depending on the matchup.
The Rays and Brewers use analytics to create adaptability. The Yankees have too often used it to narrow their choices.
If the organization wants the offense to improve, the fix may require more varied hitters through trades or free agency. It could also mean a new voice in the hitting department, with the possibility of a more analytically driven hitting coach replacing James Rowson. And it may require more buy-in from hitters themselves, following the example set by Rice and Stanton.
However the Yankees choose to go about it, the message is the same: the underlying data has to be used better if the offense is going to change.
In Other News...
Trent Grisham's Yankees Future Suddenly Looks Far Less Certain
Trent Grisham had positioned himself as a useful piece for the Yankees after his offensive contributions in 2025, but the conversation around him has shifted as the 2026 season has worn on. His defense has slipped, and a hamstring injury only added to the uncertainty, giving the front office another reminder that his profile is no longer quite as straightforward as it looked a year ago.
With other players emerging around him, Grisham's role in New York suddenly feels less secure than it did before. There has already been speculation that clubs such as the Astros could keep an eye on his situation, and while nothing official has happened, the Yankees now have a decision to make about how much they value what he brings versus the alternatives beginning to crowd the picture. [Read more 🡒]
Yankees Face A Bigger Catcher Decision Than Fans Expected
Austin Wells spent much of the first half of the 2026 season fighting through a stretch that included time on the injured list with cervical headaches, and it made the catcher picture look far less settled than the Yankees probably hoped. Even so, his work behind the plate stayed steady throughout the year, giving the club at least one reliable element in a position where defense can matter as much as anything else.
The more interesting part now is what comes next. Wells' stronger second half and playoff showing gave the Yankees a reason to believe in the version of him they saw down the stretch, but the front office is still weighing a broader offseason plan at catcher, with free agents and trade options in the mix. In other words, this is no longer just about whether Wells can handle the job, but whether the Yankees are comfortable betting on that improvement as the foundation of the position. [Read more 🡒]
Yankees May Have A Ryan McMahon Decision They Can't Ignore
Ryan McMahon has given the Yankees the kind of steadiness they wanted at third base, at least on the defensive side, but the bat has not matched the glove. With the front office already weighing its next move, the question is no longer whether third base matters, but whether New York can keep living with the current balance of run prevention and run production at the position.
Alec Bohm has surfaced as a possible answer, and his appeal is obvious for a team looking for more offense from the right side of the plate. The catch is just as obvious: Bohms defensive metrics have trended down, which leaves the Yankees staring at the same old trade-off, whether to stick with McMahon, shrink his role, or chase a different fit altogether. [Read more 🡒]