There’s a strange conversation bubbling up around this postseason, and it really shouldn’t be a conversation at all.
Mason Miller missing Game 3 of the NLDS because his wife, Jordan, went into labor has somehow become a topic for debate. The San Diego Padres closer was placed on MLB’s postseason paternity list, which allows a player to step away from the team for one to three days.
San Diego was facing elimination, Miller is an All-Star closer, and yes, his absence mattered from a baseball standpoint. But it also didn’t require a referendum.
Then Max Fried stepped right into the middle of it.
With the New York Yankees set for Game 3 of the ALDS against the Tampa Bay Rays, Fried said Tuesday that he plans to make his scheduled start even if his girlfriend goes into labor. She is due any day, and Fried said he has a supportive family and that the situation would not affect his availability Wednesday.
That is his call. Full stop.
If Fried and his partner have talked it through and decided he should pitch, that’s their business. The same goes for Miller, who chose to be with his family.
Neither decision is some kind of measuring stick for toughness, commitment or competitive fire. Pitching through the possibility of a child’s birth does not make Fried more serious than Miller.
Leaving for paternity leave does not make Miller less devoted to his teammates.
These are private decisions involving two people, one of whom is literally giving birth. They are not leadership seminars. They are not tests for the internet to grade.
The online discourse, predictably, has been loud and weird. One post framed Miller and Fried as if fans were supposed to crown a winner in a made-up contest about who “wants it more.”
Another argued that paternity leave shouldn’t even be part of the discussion. And really, that’s the only sensible place to land.
What makes this whole thing even uglier is the timing. Baseball is doing this less than a year after the Alex Vesia situation.
Vesia stepped away from the Los Angeles Dodgers before the 2025 World Series because of what the team initially called a “deeply personal family matter.” His wife, Kayla, had been expecting their first child.
Later, the Vesias announced that their newborn daughter, Sterling Sol, died on Oct. 26.
Vesia missed the World Series because his family needed him during an unimaginable tragedy.
Months later, Vesia said leaving his teammates was difficult, but the decision itself was easy: his family needed him. That should have shut the door on this entire debate.
Nobody watching from home knows what is happening inside a delivery room. Nobody knows whether a pregnancy that looks routine will stay that way.
Nobody knows what complications might come up for the mother or the child. Nobody knows what a couple has already been through privately before they reach that point.
And nobody needs to know.
That’s why Miller didn’t need to explain himself. That’s why Fried doesn’t need to justify pitching, either. The only opinions that matter are the ones inside those relationships.
There’s also something backward about treating a father being present for childbirth like an optional extra that becomes less acceptable depending on the size of the game on the schedule. MLB has a paternity list for exactly this reason.
Miller didn’t ditch his teammates. He used a league-recognized leave while his wife gave birth.
And the Padres, without him, still won. They beat Milwaukee 4-3, with Michael King getting a six-out save to keep their season alive.
That’s the other piece people seem eager to ignore: teams are built with 26 players. Organizations plan for injuries, illness and every other kind of unexpected absence because players are human beings, not postseason machines. Having a baby fits pretty comfortably in the category of life event that outranks baseball.
None of that takes anything away from Fried, either. The Yankees are on the brink, and he wants the ball.
That deserves respect. So does the choice another player might make to stay home.
Both can be true without turning one man’s decision into a verdict on another’s character.
That’s the part the argument keeps missing. Fried doesn’t need to be criticized for pitching.
Miller doesn’t need to be criticized for leaving. And after what happened with Vesia, there really shouldn’t be any confusion left about this.
A player should never have to wonder whether strangers will accuse him of abandoning his team because he chose to stand beside his partner while their child was being born.
Fried made his choice. Miller made his.
Both were theirs to make. There never needed to be a debate.
In Other News...
Yankees Just Got Hit With A Brutal Post-ALDS Question
David Ortiz has weighed in on the Yankees ALDS loss to the Rays, and his point went beyond the box score. He framed New Yorks latest postseason disappointment as a matter of culture, saying the franchise is missing the kind of clubhouse leadership and attention to detail that helped define its most successful eras. For a team that still carries the weight of its history, that kind of critique lands differently because it goes straight to the identity the Yankees have spent years trying to project.
Alex Rodriguez added another layer by pointing out the contrast between the Yankees expensive roster and Tampa Bays ability to win with far less money. It is the sort of postmortem that follows New York whenever October ends too soon, because the questions are rarely just about talent. They are about whether the Yankees still have the standards, structure and edge that once made them hard to knock out when the games mattered most. [Read more 🡒]
Aaron Judge Just Put Yankees Pressure Squarely On Brian Cashman
The Yankees season ended in familiar frustration in the American League Division Series, with the Rays finishing off a sweep by taking the final game 4-3. Aaron Judge watched it all from the sidelines after a strained right calf and a fractured rib kept the captain out of the entire postseason, a tough absence for a lineup that never quite looked like itself without him.
Judge still struck an optimistic tone about the group, even after being limited to 66 regular-season appearances, but he also made clear where the burden now falls. His message put the focus on Brian Cashman and the front office to use the offseason to patch the rosters obvious holes, a familiar mandate in New York after another October exit. [Read more 🡒]
Yankees Offseason Shakeup Could Leave Two Weak Spots Even Thinner
The Yankees are heading into an offseason that already looks like a roster reset in a few familiar places, with several recent additions likely not sticking around after the playoff loss. Paul Blackburn, Ali Snchez, Tim Hill and Jazz Chisholm Jr. are among the names tied to that uncertainty, for reasons ranging from performance to contract decisions to the broader direction the club may want to take. For a team that expected to be built for October, the turnover feels less like fine-tuning and more like another hard look at what actually held up when the games mattered.
What makes the picture trickier is the bullpen, where New York already has to think carefully about how much it can trust from year to year and how it replaces the relievers it leans on most. Losing key arms in that group would leave two weak spots even thinner, and the Yankees do not have much room to be casual about depth after another postseason exit. The offseason decisions now looming around those spots could end up shaping the whole winter, even before the bigger moves come into view. [Read more 🡒]