The Yankees have a familiar infield target back on the board, but getting him would come with a real cost. If New York wants to chase CJ Abrams, it may have to give up more than just one major league piece and call it a day.
That’s the tension hanging over this offseason for the Yankees. They need more offense in the infield after a postseason exit in which the lineup came up short against Tampa Bay, but any upgrade could ripple through the roster for years. The club has to decide whether it wants to part with pitching depth, move on from Anthony Volpe and build around an infield that could change again once top prospect George Lombard Jr. arrives.
One proposed path would send Abrams from Washington to New York in a four-player deal. The framework, floated by baseball writer Stephen Parello, would send Volpe plus right-handers Elmer Rodríguez, Rory Fox and Mac Heuer to the Nationals.
Abrams would bring exactly the kind of offensive punch the Yankees are looking for. The 26-year-old put together his first 30-30 season in 2026, batting .261 with 33 home runs, 106 RBIs, 34 stolen bases and an .833 OPS in 152 games. He also posted a .336 on-base percentage and a .497 slugging percentage, both clear jumps from 2025, when he hit 19 homers and finished with a .748 OPS.
New York has already done some homework here. The Yankees checked on Abrams before the 2026 trade deadline, when Washington was open to listening. His left-handed power, speed and remaining control make him an appealing fit, especially for a team that wants offense without jumping into a free-agent bidding war.
But this is where the price starts to bite. Volpe has already moved around the Yankees’ infield, and the other three names in the deal would come out of the organization’s pitching pipeline.
Rodríguez would leave the system as starting-pitching depth, while Fox and Heuer would be two more young arms gone from the mix. That’s the sort of return a rebuilding club would need to prefer over other offers.
There’s also the glove to think about. Abrams’ defense at shortstop has drawn criticism, and MLB’s midseason review had him last among major leaguers in cumulative Outs Above Average since 2022. A move to second base could ease some of that pressure, but it wouldn’t erase the questions about his range and positioning.
That’s why the Yankees’ version of this deal is built around a position shuffle. The idea assumes Lombard eventually takes over at shortstop, Abrams slides to second and Jose Caballero stays in a utility role. It would make the middle of the diamond younger and more athletic, but it would also ask Boone’s staff to manage another transition.
The bat, though, is the selling point. Abrams didn’t just hit more home runs in 2026 - he jumped from 19 to 33, a gain of 14.
His OPS climbed from .748 to .833, an 85-point rise. His stolen-base total only went from 31 to 34, so the biggest change was power, not speed.
That matters for Yankee Stadium, where a left-handed hitter who can do damage to the pull side can change the shape of an offense. The Yankees would be betting that Abrams gives them another source of production when their established sluggers are held in check.
Washington, meanwhile, has every reason to wait for the right offer. Abrams is approaching arbitration, and his breakout season has only driven up his value. The Nationals have previously said they will listen to offers rather than actively shop him, and they kept him through the 2026 deadline despite interest.
The market could get crowded, too. The Dodgers were mentioned as a possible fit during the summer, though their infield setup made that route less urgent. The Mets have the resources to get involved in major pursuits, but there has not been an established active push from them for Abrams.
For the Yankees, the appeal is obvious. They have a confirmed history of interest, Abrams has a 30-30 season on his résumé, and the club would avoid giving up Lombard in this version of the deal. The question is whether New York is willing to pay with three pitchers to make it happen - and whether Washington would say yes.
In Other News...
Yankees Offseason Pivot Just Put Pressure On Their Backup Plan
The Yankees offseason plans have already started to shift after their qualifying-offer decisions, and the ripple effect is easy to see in the way they are reworking their target board. By extending one to David Bednar instead of Jazz Chisholm Jr., the club altered its flexibility in free agency and now has to map out other ways to address the roster, from the infield to the bullpen to the lineup.
That has pushed New York toward a different tier of options, with Tyler Stephenson drawing attention behind the plate, Alex Vesia standing out as a left-handed relief possibility and Luis Arraez lingering as a fit at second base. Tyrone Taylor also has emerged as a more affordable alternative to Seiya Suzuki, a reminder that the Yankees may need to balance ambition with practicality as they sort through a backup plan that suddenly matters a lot more. [Read more 🡒]
Yankees Predicted Catcher Signing Could Change The Plan For Austin Wells
The Yankees have spent enough time looking at the catcher spot to know the fit has not been ideal, especially when left-handed pitching shows up and the offense gets squeezed. With no right-handed-hitting option in the mix, the position has been a clear area for improvement, and Bleacher Reports Tim Kelly sees a possible answer in Ryan Jeffers, whom he projects to land a three-year deal with New York.
Jeffers would bring the kind of offensive upside the Yankees have been missing behind the plate, even if the defensive profile is not as clean. His arrival would also ripple beyond the immediate upgrade, because it could alter how the club maps out Austin Wells and the rest of the catching picture as the Yankees try to balance production now with the long-term plan. [Read more 🡒]
Yankees Culture Debate Just Took Another Turn After Viral Criticism
The Yankees clubhouse culture has been back in the spotlight since Milwaukee Brewers manager Pat Murphys comments about the team went viral during the World Series. Murphy later said he reached out to general manager Brian Cashman to explain what he meant, stressing that the remarks were tied to a long-running joke with first baseman Jake Bauers rather than a broader shot at the 2026 Yankees.
Even so, the episode kept a familiar talking point alive around New York, where any criticism of the organization tends to carry extra weight after a disappointing postseason. Murphys explanation may have softened the edges of the original video, but it also underscored how quickly a casual aside can turn into another debate about the Yankees identity, and why the reaction around it has lingered. [Read more 🡒]