The Mets are heading toward a deadline sell-off, but this one should look nothing like the purge they staged in 2023.
That’s the big difference now: the 2026 club is bad, but it is not built like a team tearing itself down to the studs. Injuries and poor play wrecked the season, cost Carlos Mendoza his job and left the organization staring at real consequences. Still, the roster has enough useful pieces in place that the Mets can’t justify a full-scale fire sale the way they did two years ago.
Back in 2023, the Mets treated the future like a transition project. Starting pitchers nearing 40 and headed toward their best trade value made the decision easier, which is why Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander were shipped out along with rentals like Tommy Pham, Mark Canha and David Robertson.
That kind of reset made sense then. It doesn’t now.
The 2026 group looks far closer to a playoff team on paper than that 2023 roster ever did. The outfield is set for the foreseeable future, and the lineup already has Francisco Lindor, Francisco Alvarez, Jorge Polanco and Luis Torrens in place for important roles. Bo Bichette could join that mix if he opts in, which would leave first and second base as the main questions on the position-player side.
There’s work to do on the mound, but the Mets are not starting from zero. Nolan McLean and Christian Scott are already in the fold, and Clay Holmes’s recent willingness to extend could give them a third starter to build around. The bullpen also has some structure, with Devin Williams, Luke Weaver and Huascar Brazobán under contract, while Reed Garrett and Dedniel Núñez could still matter in the setup group in 2027.
That’s why this deadline should be more selective than ruthless. The Mets can still move useful pieces, and they should be one of the clearest sellers on the market. But they are also in a different class from teams like the Giants, who are weighed down by bloated contracts, and from the Royals, Rockies and Angels, who don’t have the same kind of trade chips to create a real bidding war.
The obvious rentals can still bring back help. If the Twins hold onto Joe Ryan, Freddy Peralta would be the most attractive rental starter available outside of Tarik Skubal.
Brooks Raley and A.J. Minter should each bring back a solid prospect or two, and Luis Robert Jr. could stir up a real market if he shows he’s healthy after the All-Star Break.
Tyrone Taylor is part of that rental group too.
Those kinds of moves would help a farm system that needs a boost after graduating impact players like A.J. Ewing, Carson Benge and McLean. But the bigger question is what the Mets do with players who are under control beyond this year.
Luke Weaver is the clearest example. He has drawn plenty of interest as a reliever after a huge year that included closing experience in New York. ESPN’s Jeff Passan recently said Weaver would be a perfect fit for the Pirates, who have used a closer by committee all season, and they would not be the only club interested in him for this season and next.
If the Mets were truly operating like a fire-sale team, Weaver would be the kind of player they would move right now to maximize the return. They are not expected to do that. Cohen recently said on a podcast with Jon Heyman and Joel Sherman that he expects President of Baseball Operations David Stearns to be creative in building a winner in 2027.
That matters because Weaver still has real value to the Mets. He can be a high-end setup man for Williams, or even the closer if the team flips those roles. Any trade involving Weaver would have to bring back players who help the Mets in 2027 more than Weaver himself does, and that is a tough standard to meet.
Francisco Alvarez presents a similar dilemma. He has been inconsistent, but he still has a chance to become the Mets’ long-term catcher and is under club control through 2029.
Trading him just to cash in would be the wrong move. The only way that conversation changes is if a team like the Twins decided to put Ryan on the table and needed Alvarez in the deal.
That’s the broader picture here: the Mets are already thinking about 2027, with Juan Soto still in his prime and Lindor nearing the end of his. In that kind of setup, it makes little sense to dump useful players under contract for low-level lottery tickets who may not reach the majors for two or three years.
So yes, the Mets can and should sell. But the list of players they truly need to move is mostly limited to rentals and change-of-scenery types.
For everyone else, the price is going to be high, and unless another team meets it, the Mets are likely to keep their non-rentals and make only modest changes by Aug. 3.
In Other News...
Mets Just Sent Ronny Mauricio A Message Fans Can't Ignore
Ronny Mauricios path back to the Mets took another hit when the club needed infield help after Mark Vientos landed on the injured list. Instead of giving Mauricio the opening, New York turned elsewhere, a decision that speaks to where the organization sees him right now and how crowded the infield picture has become.
Mauricios major league stint has not matched the promise he has shown in the minors, and his production at the top level has been too light to force the issue. He has been sent back to Triple-A, where he can keep playing every day, but for now the message is clear: the Mets are not handing him a job, and the next step in his season will have to be earned the hard way. [Read more 🡒]
Mets 2027 Rotation Looks Closer Than Fans Think But One Need Looms
The Mets can already sketch a plausible 2027 rotation without squinting too hard, which is not something that has always been true for this franchise. Sean Manaea, Nolan McLean, Christian Scott and Clay Holmes give the club a mix of established arms and younger pieces to imagine around, while Freddy Peralta sits out there as the kind of proven starter who could change the whole conversation if the price ever lines up.
Still, the picture is not complete, and that is what makes the next couple of seasons so interesting in Queens. The organization has internal depth to consider, including Jonah Tong as a possible long-term answer, but the real issue is finding the kind of frontline starter that can anchor a postseason-caliber staff. However the Mets go about it, whether through the trade market or a bigger swing in free agency, the need for a true ace is the part of the rotation puzzle that remains unsolved. [Read more 🡒]
Former Mets Draft Pick Is Suddenly Back In The Spotlight
Gavyn Jones has quietly worked his way back into the conversation since the Mets took the left-hander in the 18th round of the 2023 MLB Draft and he opted for college instead of signing. After beginning at McLennan Community College, he moved on to Oklahoma and settled into a bigger role with the Sooners, giving him a chance to keep developing rather than jumping straight into pro ball. He also got valuable summer work in the Cape Cod Baseball League, the kind of stage that tends to put a pitcher back on scouts radar.
Now draft eligible again, Jones is once more the sort of name teams will have to sort through carefully because the path has already taken a few turns. He was the only one of the Mets 2023 high school draftees not to sign, and his rise through junior college and Oklahoma has only added to the intrigue around what comes next. For the Mets, it is another reminder that a late-round pick can leave the organization, grow elsewhere and still circle back into the spotlight. [Read more 🡒]