This Mets Deadline Gamble Became A Painful Bullpen Reminder

Deck: A strategic gamble in 2017 didn't pay off for the Mets as AJ Ramos failed to strengthen their bullpen and add value post-trade deadline.

The Mets tried something unusual at the 2017 trade deadline: even as they were clearly in sell mode, they still made a move to bring in a player who could help right away and beyond. On July 28, with the deadline still a few days away, New York dealt with the division rival Miami Marlins for AJ Ramos, a reliever coming off a 40-save season and an All-Star nod the year before.

At the time, the fit made sense on paper. Ramos was 30, had a 2.78 ERA over 327.1 major league innings with Miami, and came with a full year of control in 2018. Even though his ERA sat at 3.63 when the Mets acquired him, the hope was obvious: add a proven arm now and get a bullpen piece who could matter the next season too.

It never really clicked.

Ramos threw 19 innings for the 2017 Mets and finished with a 4.74 ERA. By the following year, he was moved into a setup role with Jeurys Familia back healthy, but the results only got worse.

In 28 games, Ramos logged just 19.2 innings and posted a brutal 6.41 ERA. He also had serious trouble throwing strikes, walking batters at a 6.9 BB/9 clip.

His final outing for the Mets came on May 26, when he was charged with three earned runs in just 0.2 innings. It was his second straight day on the mound.

The day before, he had entered in the 10th inning and walked both hitters he faced, with the second walk coming with the bases loaded. That ended the game.

The back end of Ramos’ Mets stint was where the damage piled up. He made 10 appearances on zero days of rest and was tagged with a 15.00 ERA in those games. He also had 10 appearances on one day of rest, and in those outings he posted a 1.08 ERA.

In terms of the return, the Mets gave up Ricardo Cespedes and Merandy Gonzalez. Cespedes never got past High-A in affiliated ball and continued his career in the Independent League and foreign leagues. Gonzalez threw 22 innings for the 2018 Marlins, put up a 5.22 ERA, and never reached the majors again after that.

So while it was a smart-looking deadline buy for a team that was otherwise selling, the Ramos trade simply didn’t deliver. And with so little else going right for the 2018 Mets, from Mickey Callaway downward, the whole thing fit right into a season where plenty went off the rails.

In Other News...

Mets Deadline Picture Just Shifted With One Roster Update

A rainout turned the Mets schedule into a split double-header, but it also nudged the trade-deadline conversation into sharper focus. With next Monday looming, Laura Albaneses latest look at the roster framed several Mets as possible movers, and the names under discussion include players whose value is tied as much to timing as performance.

Luis Torrens has drawn attention from clubs looking for catching help, even as the Mets appear reluctant to part with him, while Clay Holmes second rehab start is being watched as more than just a health checkpoint. Austin Warren has also begun a rehab assignment in St. Lucie, adding another layer to a week when every roster move seems to carry deadline implications. [Read more 🡒]

Mets Could Make One Deadline Move Fans Would Instantly Debate

With the Aug. 3 trade deadline approaching, the Mets are expected to do what contenders usually do at this point in the calendar: move players who are not under contract for 2027 and keep an eye on pitching. The rotation has been the obvious place to look, and if the front office decides to chase a starter, the names on the board are the kind that can change the conversation in a hurry, from Angels right-handers Reid Detmers and Jose Soriano to Mariners arms Emerson Hancock and Luis Castillo.

The problem is that starting-pitcher shopping rarely comes cheap, especially for a team trying to balance present urgency with longer-term roster control. ESPN has already surfaced a few more possibilities in that same lane, including Joe Ryan, which only adds to the sense that the Mets could be weighing a move that would help immediately but also invite plenty of debate about how much future value they should be willing to touch for a rotation upgrade. [Read more 🡒]