The appeal is obvious. A club gets to buy out some risk, a player gets life-changing security, and everybody walks away feeling smart - at least for a while. That’s the temptation the Mets are staring at with a young core that already has people talking about long-term deals.
Carson Benge and Nolan McLean both put together seasons that have them sitting near the top of the NL Rookie of the Year race. That alone makes them look like natural candidates for an early extension, even though they’re still years away from arbitration.
A.J. Ewing could fit the same mold, too.
After an early surge, he hit a rough patch before snapping out of it in September following a visit from Keith Hernandez. From there, he put together a .309/.380/.481 line.
After an uneven rookie year, it’s easy to see why some would want to lock him in now.
But the Braves have offered a loud warning about what can go wrong when a team gets too eager.
Atlanta was ahead of the curve on this whole idea, and the results have ranged from brilliant to brutal. Ronald Acuña Jr. got an eight-year, $100 million extension at the start of the 2019 season after just one year in the majors.
He answered with 41 home runs and 37 stolen bases, then later turned in a 41-73 campaign in 2023. The contract carries a $12.5 million average annual value and includes $17 million team options for 2027 and 2028, making it a massive bargain even with the injury issues.
Ozzie Albies also signed early, landing a seven-year, $35 million deal with two $7 million team options. Atlanta picked up one of those options last offseason and still has a decision looming for 2027. Albies has been far less steady than Acuña Jr., with sub-1.5 fWAR seasons in four of the last five years, but the price is low enough that the Braves can live with the volatility.
That’s the big shift with these deals. They used to be a cleaner trade: players gave up earning power for security, and teams gave up flexibility for control.
Now the math is different. Players get protection from being non-tendered if things go sideways.
Teams mostly get the chance to pay something close to arbitration value, with maybe a little savings on the free-agent years if everything breaks right.
And the Braves have three more examples that show how messy that can become.
Spencer Strider signed a six-year, $75 million deal before the 2023 season, after he was just starting to establish himself as an ace. His first year was excellent: 186 2/3 innings, a 3.86 ERA and a 36.8% strikeout rate over 32 starts.
Since then, injuries have changed the picture. He has made only 33 starts over the last three years and has a 4.78 ERA in that stretch.
In 2026, Atlanta paid him $20 million for eight starts and a 5.31 ERA. With an elbow issue now in the mix, he’ll cost $22 million in both 2027 and 2028.
Austin Riley’s deal was even bigger. On August 1, 2022, the Braves handed him the most lucrative contract in franchise history: 10 years, $212 million, starting in 2023 and running through 2032, even though he still had all three arbitration seasons left.
His 2023 season justified the investment, but 2024 and 2025 were derailed by injuries. He stayed healthy in 2026 and played 159 games, yet the production wasn’t there.
He hit .219/.390/.364 with 19 homers and a career-worst 31.9% strikeout rate. With so much term left, the deal already has the look of a potential albatross.
Then there’s Sean Murphy. Atlanta acquired him from the Athletics before the 2023 season and immediately gave him a six-year, $73 million extension.
Injuries followed, and Murphy has spent the last three years batting under .200. Drake Baldwin has passed him on the depth chart, leaving Murphy as a backup catcher making an average of $12.17 million per year.
His 2026 line of .186/.256/.300 was the worst of his career, and there are still two years and $30 million remaining.
The common thread is obvious: injuries mattered. But so did the danger of assuming development moves in a straight line.
It doesn’t. Young players improve in fits and starts, and some of the things the Mets’ kids still need to fix may not get fixed by 2027 - if they get fixed at all.
That’s why caution makes sense here. The Yankees have long taken the opposite approach, refusing to rush into extensions and instead making players prove themselves before paying them. The Mets don’t need to copy that rigidity, but they’d be smart to avoid chasing the latest trend just because it looks fashionable.
In Other News...
Edwin Diaz Is Making The Mets Regret This Decision
Edwin Diaz has already started to make the Mets think twice about how they handled his departure. After a rough regular season with the Dodgers, the right-hander found his form again once he returned from the injured list in September, and by the time the postseason arrived he looked much more like the pitcher New York remembers than the one who struggled early on in Los Angeles.
The timing only sharpens the sting for the Mets, who moved on and turned to Devin Williams instead. Diazs strong finish in the NLDS against Atlanta only adds to the sense that he was settling in when it mattered most, and it leaves New York with an uncomfortable reminder of what it gave up. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Face A Tough Zac Thornton Decision As 2027 Plans Take Shape
As the Mets look ahead to the 2027 season, the front office is weighing every avenue to upgrade a roster that could still use more impact, and the trade market remains part of that conversation. One name that naturally comes up is Zac Thornton, the left-hander who turned in a strong rookie season and quickly made himself a potential asset if New York decides to chase help elsewhere.
The catch is that Thorntons value is tied to how much the organization believes in his long-term profile, not just what he already showed. The Mets have been clear about wanting to keep a deep stock of starting pitching in the system and on the roster, a philosophy that complicates any discussion about moving a young arm with upside, especially when the club is trying to balance present flexibility against future stability. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Got An Early Reminder How Raw Their Newest Prospects Are
The Arizona Fall League has already given Mets watchers a small reminder that prospect development does not always move in a straight line. Cole Mathis and Bruin Agbayani have gotten off to slow starts in the desert, combining for just two hits in 24 at-bats, though Mathis has at least shown some plate discipline after missing much of the regular season because of injury and Agbayani is still working with a very small professional resume.
There is still plenty of reason for the Mets to keep paying attention beyond the early line scores. Boston Baro and Irving Cota are also in the mix, and Cota has drawn notice for a promising start on the pitching side, which gives the organization a broader look at how this group is handling a tougher level of competition. For Mathis and Agbayani, though, the early AFL stretch is less about production and more about how quickly raw talent can start to look like something sturdier. [Read more 🡒]