Mets Project Massive 2026 Payroll Amid Shocking Offseason Departures

Amid a turbulent offseason and key roster changes, the Mets signal their ongoing ambition with a projected 2026 payroll that keeps them among MLB's biggest spenders.

Mets’ Offseason Balancing Act: High-Profile Departures, Quiet Additions, and a Roster Still in Motion

The number that keeps coming up is $295 million. That’s where the New York Mets currently sit in payroll, just weeks into an offseason that’s already delivered more shakeup than most fans were ready for.

Pete Alonso is gone. Brandon Nimmo is gone.

Edwin Díaz is gone. Several bullpen arms have followed them out the door.

That kind of turnover hits hard - not just on the field, but in the clubhouse and in the team’s identity.

But let’s be clear: this isn’t a teardown. Not even close.

Losing Stars, Gaining Structure

The Mets haven’t made the kind of splashy headlines that come with blockbuster signings or massive trades, but they’ve made moves - and they’ve made them with purpose.

Jorge Polanco brings a solid, switch-hitting bat and the kind of positional versatility that matters more than ever in today’s game. He’s a Silver Slugger finalist who can slot in across the infield and lengthen the lineup in meaningful ways.

Devin Williams? That’s a real bullpen weapon.

With his elite changeup and late-inning pedigree, he gives the Mets a closer-caliber arm who can shorten games - something they sorely lacked at times last season. And while Luke Weaver might not turn heads, he brings innings, adaptability, and a steady hand to a bullpen that desperately needed more of all three.

These aren’t headline-grabbers. They’re foundation pieces. Moves designed not to dazzle, but to prevent the kind of collapse that unraveled the second half of last season.

The Payroll Picture - and the Steve Cohen Factor

The Mets are sitting at $295 million in payroll, and that number matters. Not just because it’s already sky-high, but because of what it signals about what could still be coming.

Owner Steve Cohen has made it clear: he doesn’t see the payroll dipping below last year’s $322.6 million - the highest in baseball. That’s not just a financial statement.

That’s a competitive one. It means the Mets still have room to make impact additions.

Not theoretical wiggle room - real, actionable space. Enough to bring in a star.

Maybe even two, depending on how things are structured.

That kind of flexibility becomes especially important when you look at what’s still missing on this roster.

Starting Pitching: The Most Pressing Need

Let’s not sugarcoat it - the rotation was exposed in a big way last season. When Tylor Megill went down, the whole staff started to unravel.

Kodai Senga struggled to find rhythm. David Peterson and Sean Manaea couldn’t hold up down the stretch, with injuries and innings piling up.

Running that same group back and hoping for better luck? That’s not a strategy - that’s a roll of the dice.

The Mets know it. They were in on Michael King before he signed in San Diego.

Framber Valdez is still out there. So is Tatsuya Imai, who brings upside and intrigue.

The Mets don’t need to land all of them - they just need one true anchor. A stabilizing force at the top of the rotation.

Someone who can stop a losing streak and set the tone every fifth day.

Lineup Holes That Still Need Filling

The outfield? It’s thin.

Left field is wide open. Center field is unsettled.

And first base? Unless the Mets want to stretch Polanco into a full-time role he’s not built for, that’s still a question mark too.

That’s where a guy like Cody Bellinger makes all the sense in the world. He doesn’t just fill one hole - he covers multiple.

He brings athleticism, defensive versatility, and a left-handed bat with power. He gives the Mets a way to patch several leaks with one move.

Names like Alex Bregman and Bo Bichette have also surfaced. Either would reshape the lineup in a different way, but the message would be the same: the Mets aren’t retreating. They’re still looking to compete from a position of strength.

The Offseason Isn’t Over - and Neither Are the Mets

Here’s the reality: the Mets have already absorbed more talent loss in one offseason than most teams could handle. But they’ve also made smart, stabilizing moves that keep the floor from falling out.

They’re still under last year’s payroll. They still have an owner willing to spend. And they still have obvious needs that haven’t been addressed - yet.

This offseason isn’t finished. Not by a long shot.

The Mets have the resources, the urgency, and the opportunity to reshape this roster before pitchers and catchers report. What they do next will determine whether this winter becomes a quiet retooling - or a bold pivot back into contention.