The Mets’ deadline haul may have been built on a move that started years earlier, and the player who came out the other end is Jefferson Rojas.
New York’s late-summer cleanup last month sent a handful of veterans out the door and brought younger talent into the system, but Rojas stands above the rest. Before joining the Mets, the infield prospect was widely viewed as a top-100 player in the Cubs’ system. The part that makes the whole thing interesting is how many steps it took to get there.
It all traces back to December 2021, when the Mets signed Eduardo Escobar to a two-year contract. Escobar gave them decent production, but the price tag was steep: a $40 million deal. In 176 games with New York, he put up a 103 wRC+ before the club decided to move on in June 2023.
That’s when the chain reaction really started. The Mets sent Escobar to the Angels for pitching prospects Coleman Crow and Landon Marceaux.
Marceaux later retired without reaching the majors, and Crow never appeared in an official game for the Mets at any level. On its face, that looks like a dead end.
But Crow was flipped to Milwaukee just six months later in a deal that brought back Adrian Houser and Tyrone Taylor.
Houser was the rotation insurance piece, but Taylor wound up carrying the real value. Across 310 games for the Mets from 2024 through 2026, he hit 48 doubles, 19 homers and stole 23 bases, while also logging more than a thousand innings of quality defense in center field and strong work in the corners.
By this year’s trade deadline, Taylor’s departure felt inevitable. He was hitting with an OPS pushing .800, and free agency was coming in November.
The question wasn’t whether the Mets would trade him, but whether they could squeeze enough value out of the move. David Stearns did, and the payoff appears to be Rojas.
Clay Holmes was the centerpiece of the trade, but it’s hard to imagine the Cubs parting with a prospect of Rojas’s caliber for a single player who is likely headed for free agency after the season. Taylor was the extra piece that helped push Chicago into the deal. In a very roundabout way, Mets fans can trace that back to Escobar.
The larger lesson is pretty clear: trades and signings don’t always reveal their full shape right away. Sometimes the value takes years to surface, and sometimes the final verdict never arrives at all.
That cuts both ways for the Mets. It can make a modest return look better in hindsight, but it also leaves plenty of room for disappointment if the prospect at the center of the deal never turns into much.
Rojas has the talent and the hype, but he’s still just getting started. He has not yet become an impact big leaguer, and that’s the risk baked into any deal like this.
Even recent Cubs trade returns have shown how quickly a prized prospect can stall out. Cam Smith, the headliner in the Astros’ return for Kyle Tucker, has not done much so far, with more than 250 MLB games and an OPS below .700 as a corner outfielder.
For now, though, Rojas is giving the Mets reasons to feel good. In his first 13 games with the organization at Double-A, he has an OPS north of .800 and seven extra-base hits. That’s a strong opening chapter for a trade tree that started long before anyone was talking about Jefferson Rojas.
In Other News...
Juan Soto Is Still Giving The Mets Exactly What They Paid For
Juan Sotos first full season of impact in Queens has looked a lot like the version the Mets thought they were buying. In 84 games in 2026, he hit .283/.408/.539, numbers that sit right in line with his career profile and underline how little his production has drifted despite the stop-and-start nature of his year.
Even with the missed time, Sotos approach remained as polished as ever, and he even trimmed his strikeout rate to a career-low 13.4 percent while lifting his fly-ball rate to 34.8 percent. The bigger question for the Mets is not whether he can hit like Juan Soto, but whether they can keep him on the field long enough for that consistency to matter over the full season. [Read more 🡒]
Bo Bichette Showed The Mets Exactly What This Roster Needs
Steve Cohens comments about the pressure cooker that comes with New York only sharpened the broader point for the Mets: talent alone is not enough when a player has to navigate a demanding market, constant noise and the everyday strain of expectations. Bo Bichettes season offered a useful example of that reality. He started slowly, then steadily found his footing while showing the kind of resilience teams crave, even as he moved around the diamond and kept his focus through the criticism that can follow a rough patch.
For the Mets, that kind of response matters because the club has lived through its own version of the New York scrutiny cycle for years. Bichettes ability to absorb the moment, adjust and keep producing stood in contrast to the way Kyle Tucker has been described in Los Angeles, where the environmental and mental demands of a big market can shape a players entire year. The lesson for the Mets is obvious enough: if they want the roster to hold up under the spotlight, they need more than skill. They need players built for the stage. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Fans Still Know This Painful Way A Strong Debut Gets Wasted
Collin McHughs first big-league start for the Mets was the kind of debut that should have set up a celebration, not a shrug. On Aug. 23, 2012, he gave New York seven innings of strong work and barely allowed anything of consequence, but the lineup around him never pushed across a run, leaving him with a no-decision in a game that felt painfully familiar to anyone who has watched a good Mets pitching effort go to waste.
McHughs career eventually turned into a very different story, as the right-hander dug himself out of an 0-8 start and later found real success after joining the Astros in 2014. But for Mets fans, the memory of that debut still lands in the same place as so many frustrating nights before and after it: a promising performance on the mound, limited help at the plate, and the uneasy sense that the result should have looked much better. [Read more 🡒]