Luke Weaver has worked his way into a tricky spot for the Mets. He’s been one of the best bullpen arms in the league this season, and that kind of performance always turns a reliever into a trade chip worth talking about.
The question isn’t whether teams will call. They will.
The real question is what it takes for the Mets to actually say yes.
The answer starts with this: not much, in the Mets’ view, would be a mistake. Weaver is under control for next year at a reasonable price, which makes him more than a rental.
He’s the kind of piece a contender would want for the stretch run now and into 2026, and possibly beyond that. So if the Mets move him, the return has to matter.
At the very least, that means one real prospect with impact. A top 100 name would fit the bill, or someone close enough to that level that the industry sees him as a serious talent.
Those rankings are imperfect and subjective, but they still give a decent read on what kind of player a team is getting back. The Mets should not settle for a package built around filler.
They also need someone who can help soon. One MLB-ready player should be part of the deal, because a Weaver trade only makes sense if the Mets can plug in a piece right away.
A one-for-one swap probably doesn’t get it done unless another club is willing to part with the best player in its system. More likely, the Mets should be looking at a two-player return, with three being possible if the quality is there.
But the emphasis has to stay on quality, not volume.
The preferred return would include at least one pitcher, though the exact position doesn’t have to be the headline. A corner infielder would also make sense, especially with first base and third base still undefined for next year. The Mets need something that helps them now and gives them a reason to part with a reliever who has become so valuable.
There is a recent trade that helps set the bar. Last year, the Mets sent Drew Gilbert, Blade Tidwell and Jose Butto to the San Francisco Giants for two months of Tyler Rogers. For Weaver, the ask is simple: something a little better than Gilbert or Tidwell, plus a Butto type with control and upside.
That’s the standard. The Mets have room to evaluate pitchers and position players after the deadline, and Weaver could end up being the bullpen arm who brings back the most.
He might also be their biggest bullpen safety net if they keep him. Either way, the Mets are right to keep the price high.
In Other News...
Mets Suddenly Have A New Reason To Love The David Peterson Trade
The David Peterson trade looked like a straightforward swap when the Mets sent the left-hander to the Cubs for Cole Mathis, a prospect who had not yet taken the field in the minors for New York. But the early read on the deal has started to shift, thanks to the way Mathis has been viewed inside the organization and the sense that the Mets may have added a player with more long-term upside than the return initially suggested.
Peterson, meanwhile, has already had a mixed start in Chicago, which has only added to the second-guessing around the move from both sides. For the Mets, the real question now is whether Mathis can turn that promise into production once he gets his first chance in the system, because the trade is beginning to look like one of those deals that could age very differently than it did on draft day. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Have One Rookie They Should Lock Up Before Another Selloff
With a trade deadline sell-off looming after a rough first half, the Mets are already being pushed to think beyond the current season and toward the next wave of young talent. Nolan McLean, Carson Benge and A.J. Ewing have all put themselves in the conversation as possible National League Rookie of the Year contenders in 2026, which is exactly the kind of development the organization needs if it is going to keep restocking the roster while the front office trims elsewhere.
Ewing is the one who stands out as the most sensible candidate to prioritize for a long-term deal, not just because of his age but because of the way he fits the roster. His consistency, running and defense give him a different kind of value, and center field carries a premium that can make a young player especially worth securing early. For a Mets club trying to build around its next core, locking in one of these rookies before the next wave of roster churn would send a clear message about where the future is headed. [Read more 🡒]