Mets History Debate Brings A New 1969 Postseason Honor Into Focus

Despite the absence of an official MVP award in the 1969 NLCS, Tommie Agee's standout performance has many considering him as a worthy honoree for the Mets' sweep over the Braves.

Long before the league started handing out Championship Series MVP awards, the 1969 Mets made sure their first playoff run had plenty of worthy candidates. New York swept the Braves in three games, outscored Atlanta 27-15, and did it without one obvious singular star carrying the whole thing. But if you’re going back and naming a retro NLCS MVP anyway, Tommie Agee has the cleanest case.

The series itself tilted toward the bats. Tom Seaver and Jerry Koosman each had rough outings in their only appearances, so this wasn’t a pitching-driven march to the finish. It was the hitters who set the tone, and Agee finished at the front of the pack.

Agee led the Mets with two home runs, which is enough to separate him from the crowd in a short series. His first was a two-run shot in his second plate appearance of Game 2, helping stretch an early Mets lead.

He followed that with another homer in Game 3, jumping on the Braves in the third inning to open the scoring. Later in that game, with New York trailing 2-1 at the time he crossed home plate, Agee added an RBI single for the final run either team would score that day.

He wasn’t the only Met making noise at the plate. Art Shamsky had a team-high 7 hits, though he drove in just one run.

Cleon Jones matched him with 6 hits. Jones also gave Agee a serious run for the honor, and the two were nearly even in a lot of the box-score details.

Both players stole 2 bases in 2 tries. Each drove in 4 runs.

Jones had the edge in doubles, two to one, while Agee had the advantage where it matters most in a short series: home runs, 2-0. Agee was also the Mets’ regular-season home run leader with 26, while Jones’ .340 batting average became the kind of number people remember and chase for years.

There’s also the strange absence of Donn Clendenon from the series conversation. The 1969 World Series MVP didn’t appear in a single moment for the Mets in this matchup, stuck on the wrong side of a platoon with Ed Kranepool. Gil Hodges was committed to that arrangement, and with only two innings of left-handed pitching from the Braves, Clendenon simply wasn’t needed.

New York’s first playoff series didn’t deliver the kind of late-inning drama that would define some of the franchise’s later October moments. The Mets won too comfortably for that.

Still, if you go back and sort through the numbers, Agee and Wayne Garrett were the two strongest names in the mix. Garrett posted a WPA of 0.38, just ahead of Agee at 0.37, but Agee gets the edge here because he finished with one more run, one more RBI, and one more home run.

So the belated 1969 NLCS MVP belongs to Tommie Agee.

In Other News...

Mets Fans Had Every Reason To Hate This Cheap Yankees Comparison

MLB insider Jon Heyman managed to poke at a sore spot for Mets fans with a comparison nobody in Queens asked for, linking the Yankees early-game mistakes to the Mets defensive struggles from earlier in the 2026 season. It was the kind of casual cross-town shot that lands differently when the subject has already spent months dealing with its own mess, from shaky defense to coaching changes and the broader frustrations that followed.

The sting was less about the Yankees than the reminder of how quickly the Mets became an easy target when things were going wrong. Their defense did tighten up later in the season, and as the errors eased, so did the drumbeat of criticism around the club, which is part of why Heymans tweet felt so unnecessary to plenty of fans. In a season full of challenges, the Mets had already been through the hard part without needing the comparison dragged back up. [Read more 🡒]

Mets Offensive Struggles Just Put More Of Andy Greens Staff In Focus

The Mets coaching room is already headed for a reset, with the team announcing that Jeff Albert, Danny Barnes and Kevin Mahoney will not return to the major league staff for the 2027 season. All three could still remain in the organization in some other capacity, but for now they are free to look around elsewhere, a sign that the club is sorting through more than just roster questions as it tries to steady the offense.

What makes the move more notable is what is not changing. Andy Green is expected to keep the rest of his staff intact, including Troy Snitker, Justin Willard and Kai Correa, giving the Mets a clearer picture of who will be in place as they try to solve their offensive issues. For a team that has spent much of the season searching for answers at the plate, the composition of Greens staff is quickly becoming part of the conversation. [Read more 🡒]

Mets Roster Shakeup Talk Now Includes Starters Fans Know Well

The Mets already have one eye on a bigger reset, and three familiar names are sitting at the center of the conversation. Marcus Semien, Sean Manaea and Mark Vientos all have reasons to be part of the clubs future picture, but each also comes with enough concern that their status as regular starters is no longer something to take for granted. In a market like New York, where expectations move faster than patience, those questions matter.

Semiens slide, Manaeas uneven stretch and Vientos defensive problems paired with an offensive step back have pushed this into more than a routine roster debate. The larger point is hard to miss: if the Mets want to get back to the postseason, they may need to make uncomfortable choices and rework the core around players who can be counted on more consistently. [Read more 🡒]