The Mets may be sliding toward seller mode, but Francisco Lindor should be the one name that never even makes it onto the board.
With the Aug. 3 trade deadline approaching, David Stearns is expected to listen on plenty of possibilities as New York tries to sort through a season that has gone off the rails. Rentals like Freddy Peralta are the obvious chips, and even players with longer-term control, such as Luke Weaver, are part of the ongoing discussion. But the idea that the Mets should entertain offers on Lindor is a different matter entirely.
That chatter got a jolt on Sunday when Jon Heyman of the New York Post posted a list of Mets players he wouldn’t move and left Lindor off it, setting off a wave of reaction from fans and pundits. The post was especially strange because Steve Cohen had already told Heyman on a podcast appearance on Heyman’s own show that Lindor isn’t going anywhere.
Cohen also helped stir the conversation around Lindor earlier by saying in a broad interview that there had been friction between the Mets’ two superstars, though that issue has since been resolved.
The bigger point is that the Mets do not need a total teardown, even if that’s how plenty of people have started to frame things. The offense already has a core in place, and if Bo Bichette opts into his contract for next season, that group gets even stronger.
Injuries have also distorted the picture. Soto missed a few weeks with a calf issue, and Lindor was out for two months with a calf strain of his own. That meant this past week was the first time since the start of April that the Mets had their top three hitters together for more than a few games.
Lindor remains exactly the kind of player a team builds around. He is an All-Star shortstop who can hit 25 home runs, drive in 90 runs and play Gold Glove-caliber defense. Replacing that kind of production is brutally hard, and the Mets already got a taste of how much they missed him when Bichette filled in during Lindor’s absence.
There’s also reason to believe Lindor is starting to settle back in after the IL stint. He has 8 hits in his last 31 at-bats, a .258 clip, with two home runs, five RBI and six runs scored over his past seven games.
Trading stars usually looks worse in hindsight because no pile of players can truly replace one elite player’s impact. The Mets’ original Lindor deal is a perfect example. They sent Amed Rosario, Andres Gimenez and two prospects to Cleveland, and the return has already proven lopsided in New York’s favor.
Rosario spent 2.5 years with the Guardians before moving on, while Gimenez had a strong run that included an All-Star nod and a contract extension before being dealt to Toronto ahead of the 2025 season. The two prospects the Mets included, Josh Wolf and Isaiah Greene, are not in affiliated baseball today.
The numbers tell the story too. Rosario and Gimenez combined for 23.4 Wins Above Replacement in 6.5 seasons with Cleveland, while Lindor has produced 27.9 WAR himself in one fewer season.
Even with the age and contract questions that come with Lindor - he turns 33 in November and has five more years left on his deal, worth $135 million in present-day dollars after this season - the market problem is obvious. A player with that salary and that injury history does not create the kind of bidding war that would justify moving him unless the return is massive.
Cohen has shown before that he is willing to pay down money to move contracts, as he did in 2023 with the midseason trades of Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander. But that situation was different. Those pitchers were not part of the Mets’ long-term plan, while Lindor is central to what the team wants to be in 2027.
That is the real issue here. If the Mets want their best shot at winning then, the answer is Lindor and Soto in the same lineup. Not Soto plus a package of unknowns and hope.
In Other News...
Why Would The Mets Even Consider This NL East Trade Rumor
The National League East has a way of turning even routine roster chatter into something more urgent, and this latest bit of speculation fits that pattern. A CBS Sports writer floated a scenario in which the Mets would consider moving a pitcher who has been sidelined after taking a 110-plus mph line drive off his leg, a reminder that health and timing can reshape how front offices view a player almost overnight.
The wrinkle here is the business side as much as the injury. With a $12 million player option after the season in the mix, the Mets have to weigh whether holding on makes sense if the return could be limited, especially in a division where every edge matters. Nothing has been confirmed, but the rumor underscores how quickly a contender can be pushed to think about value, risk and what happens if it waits too long. [Read more 🡒]
One Forgotten Mets Deadline Move Looks Worse With The Dodgers
The Mets spent the 2024 trade deadline trying to fortify a roster that eventually pushed deep into October, and most of the attention naturally went to the bigger swings that helped shape that run against the Dodgers. But tucked inside the deadline shuffle was a smaller move that has aged a lot more awkwardly, especially now that Los Angeles is getting some useful innings from a pitcher New York once had in its system.
Paul Gervase has given the Dodgers a bullpen option they can keep leaning on, even if the results have come with the usual rookie volatility. He has shown enough swing-and-miss to matter, but also enough control trouble to keep the story from feeling finished, which is exactly the kind of detail that makes a modest deadline deal look different in hindsight. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Fans May Finally Embrace This Tyrone Taylor Trade Idea
If the Mets do decide Tyrone Taylor is movable, the return may not need to be flashy to make sense. Seattle has been sorting through its own outfield picture, and that kind of roster crunch can create openings for a deal built around depth and upside rather than a headline name. For New York, the appeal is obvious: Taylor is the sort of piece a contender can part with if it helps address another part of the roster, especially when the front office is looking for ways to keep the margins working in its favor.
The more interesting part is whether the Mets would use that kind of swap to bring in a pitcher who is close enough to matter soon, but still has some development left in the tank. With A.J. Minter and Brooks Raley no longer in the mix, there is at least a path for a left-handed arm to get a look, and Seattles system has one that has been moving through the upper levels with strong strikeout numbers and steady run prevention. The wrinkle is timing, because a pitcher in that spot can be useful to a club now, while also carrying enough roster pressure that the other side has to decide whether to hold on or make a move before the offseason changes the calculus. [Read more 🡒]